• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

ITT: Post keyed flags

1723393811512.png
 
View attachment 27921
Another version I found. Albeit I think the blue color doesn't look good.
Yeah but, first of all the double Eagle doesn't make sense because the right one is symbolising Turkish holdings in the middle east and I don't really know what the blue and white stripes are for except maybe replicate the seljuk colours. The crescent with cross symbol seems kinda weird but I guess it could mean harmony between Christians and Muslims?
 
The crescent is not an exclusively Islamic symbol at all kek. It existed before even Islam itself. Generally it's associated with the Ottomans, Islamic states that were formerly part of the Ottoman Empire have a crescent in their flags while others usually don't have it. It is also common to see it used in the flags of Turkic countries. So there's no conflict in putting a crescent and a cross together.
In addition, I believe a crescent-under-cross symbol is sometimes specifically used to indicate a Christian triumph over Islam in an area, like how Muslim-occupied places in the Caucasus that were later conquered by the Russian Christians had churches built with that symbol adorning their top. I think there are some Eastern Orthodox churches like that in Tatarstan.
 
You can count from 1-5 (4 is an unlucky number) with these moggers

Texan Flag
Flag_of_Texas.svg.png

Michigan Flag Redesign Proposal
michigan.png

Flag of "The Republic of The Rio Grande"
Flag_of_the_Republic_of_the_Rio_Grande.svg.png

Flag of The Republic of Yucatan
yucatan.png



Fun fact: The Republic of The Rio Grande is a complete fabrication. There is no historical record from the rebels that show they wanted to secede. The records show the opposite, actually. They show that they wanted to overthrow the centralist government and unify the country under a federation. Portraying them as secessionists was pure Texan propaganda to justify their own secession. The only contemporary records that suggest that such a republic existed were Texan sources.
 
You can count from 1-5 (4 is an unlucky number) with these moggers

Texan Flag
View attachment 27965
Michigan Flag Redesign Proposal
View attachment 27966
Flag of "The Republic of The Rio Grande"
View attachment 27967
Flag of The Republic of Yucatan
View attachment 27968


Fun fact: The Republic of The Rio Grande is a complete fabrication. There is no historical record from the rebels that show they wanted to secede. The records show the opposite, actually. They show that they wanted to overthrow the centralist government and unify the country under a federation. Portraying them as secessionists was pure Texan propaganda to justify their own secession. The only contemporary records that suggest that such a republic existed were Texan sources.
Probably just like this "country" that was declared, but after the declaration of its independence there is almost no source about this "republic":
 
Back
Top