That isn't it at all. High ranking party members using their positions to create monopolies doesn't make those industries state owned. They are still owned by private indivduals and operate as such. Seriously, If larry fink became a congressman, does this make blackrock "state owned" ridiculous logic.
they werent anti-capitalist (totally since they were'nt radical jewish marxists or bolsheviks.) And yes they were pro Socialist as long as it wasnt marxian/bolshevik/internationale socialism; but they were anti-communist; The Nazis were Really Just Social Democrats who liked a mixed economy of both socialism and capitalism to get the best of both sides for the german people hence the name "National-Socialist" (this was also a way of them opposing internationale marxian bolshevik socialism and also how they were socialists only for their peoples and nation.) and they didnt like radical jewish communism that totally destroyed capitalism and culture, religion, aryans, ETC nor did they totally like capitalism which via class exploitation would wrong the workers and lead way for bolshevik revolutions which they wanted to prevent and stop entireley.
they were fascist (right-wing socialist)
You cannot "mix" socialism and capitalism this is liberal delusion. Social Democracy isn't Socialism and they haven't even pretended to be socialists for a very long time. Socialism is not when everything is free. Socialism is the complete socialization of the means of production. This is incompatible with Capitalism which enshrines "property rights".
what would you call the NEP then?
Basic idea Feudalism --> Capitalism ---> Socialism ---> Communism
so you're saying the NEP was capitalist and not socialist?
Of course!,why wound xhey?some right wingers support maybe a bit just so economy doesnt fall,and some are either neo pagan larp living in forest neo luddist anarho/green anarcho fascists,you GYAT to find ur own mentality chvd...
they were a mix of socdem and fascist (right wing socialists.) the nazis did nationalize and colectivise all of the industry (fascist socialism.) but left some so that the german people would prosper and to not have any worrys of a jewish bolshevik revolution that would take advantage of the workers spite for the capitalist system then use them as pawns to overthrow tradittional europe (like what were seeing today in the west.) so fascism and fascists were right wing culturally to preserve there people and nations and left wing economicaly so that the fascist regime and its native peoples could prosper; They were doing this to prevent bolshevik-jewish takeover but to still give the people what they want (Socialism.) without the destruction of the peoples and nation and culture and a jewish takeover and how they would give socialism was through fascism and fascism would give the people what they want while stopping and preventing a radical jewish-bolshevik takeover and the destruction of evrope and the world (What we are seeing today do to them losing ww2.) Also we see the proof of them wanting and destroying and preventing bolshevism (Franco and the falange in spain, Mussolini and the fascists in italy, hitler and the nazis in germany,szalasi in hungary, ETC.) all prevented bolshevik-jewish takeovers by implenting fascism giving the people what they want (Socialism.) but still being right wing to defend their peoples and nations.)
Yeah, it was a temporary measured based on Lenin's personal view that Russia was too feudal for socialism.
they were a mix of socdem and fascist (right wing socialists.) the nazis did nationalize and colectivise all of the industry (fascist socialism.) but left some so that the german people would prosper and to not have any worrys of a jewish bolshevik revolution that would take advantage of the workers spite for the capitalist system then use them as pawns to overthrow tradittional europe (like what were seeing today in the west.) so fascism and fascists were right wing culturally to preserve there people and nations and left wing economicaly so that the fascist regime and its native peoples could prosper; They were doing this to prevent bolshevik-jewish takeover but to still give the people what they want (Socialism.) without the destruction of the peoples and nation and culture and a jewish takeover and how they would give socialism was through fascism and fascism would give the people what they want while stopping and preventing a radical jewish-bolshevik takeover and the destruction of evrope and the world (What we are seeing today do to them losing ww2.) Also we see the proof of them wanting and destroying and preventing bolshevism (Franco and the falange in spain, Mussolini and the fascists in italy, hitler and the nazis in germany,szalasi in hungary, ETC.) all prevented bolshevik-jewish takeovers by implenting fascism giving the people what they want (Socialism.) but still being right wing to defend their peoples and nations.)
no they did nationalise and collectivise some industry and socdems are socialists but not marxian socialists
Correct. The Nazis weren't socialist because they had commodity production and the value-form. That's all that's needed to prove that the Nazis weren't socialist.
They owned everything though
you're retarded
Not a argument
The first paragraph is an exact copy of your last one. The nazis didn't collectivise industry. They relied on mass privatizations, with some party members using their position to create monopolies. They sometimes intervened in the economy for the sake of the military, but light interventionism is standard in Capitalism.
>Muh commodity production
socdems are socialists and the nazis did collectvise industry
