• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

I went to chuds.life today and found out it was dystopian

Yeah, one guy.
image_2025-03-07_224433284.png
 
I am unable to understand how you're interpreting misogyny as homosexuality.
The site is explicitly male-only and has rules against "simping" for women. They adamantly insist on not being around women, whom they are very vocal and obsessive in their hatred of. That doesn't exactly sound like heterosexual male behavior to me.
 
Nigga, at least 60% of the threads on there are about how much they hate women. Here's just one such example: https://chuds.life/threads/the-female-question.3/
i think chuds life was originally made as an alternative to incel is because the incels at incels is devolved into pedophiles i think chuds life was meant for a safe space for incels while not having them devolve into pedophiles so its not surprising they dont like females a lot i think
 
Sometimes i think about becoming a incel again i consider becoming an incel again
I'm sure you'll find a nice lass one day, Jerry. There's a Geraldine Blevins out there somewhere.
They'd rather talk about Hitler fun facts than have a woman enter and gather orbiters, as female users often do. Just look at users that we've had here in the past, like literallyosakairl, soyjakfan01, or even Sodack, all of whom rather garnered orbiters over time because they were female or attention-whored immediately among joining (Osaka posting her face on her first day here, for example, or X Immigrant trying to DM Sodack off-site and date her). People in these spheres, who are predominately young men, are susceptible to the attention these women put upon themselves by their status of publicly being, well, women.
Thus, I find it logical to desire a lack of distractions from these sorts of users when moderating a forum for discussing politics and conspiracy theories like chuds.life. Disliking female forum users in this internet sphere is not equivalent to having a sexual attraction to men. As I said, I really don't understand how you're equating those two things. You can joke about how "haha, they don't like women so they must all be gay" but I just don't understand how that's logical outside of some jabby humor. I think that their disallowance of women has helped their forum preserve itself, considering the types of discussion that it's focused around.
 
I'm sure you'll find a nice lass one day, Jerry. There's a Geraldine Blevins out there somewhere.

They'd rather talk about Hitler fun facts than have a woman enter and gather orbiters, as female users often do. Just look at users that we've had here in the past, like literallyosakairl, soyjakfan01, or even Sodack, all of whom rather garnered orbiters over time because they were female or attention-whored immediately among joining (Osaka posting her face on her first day here, for example, or X Immigrant trying to DM Sodack off-site and date her). People in these spheres, who are predominately young men, are susceptible to the attention these women put upon themselves by their status of publicly being, well, women.
Thus, I find it logical to desire a lack of distractions from these sorts of users when moderating a forum for discussing politics and conspiracy theories like chuds.life. Disliking female forum users in this internet sphere is not equivalent to having a sexual attraction to men. As I said, I really don't understand how you're equating those two things. You can joke about how "haha, they don't like women so they must all be gay" but I just don't understand how that's logical outside of some jabby humor. I think that their disallowance of women has helped their forum preserve itself, considering the types of discussion that it's focused around.
chuds.life certainly stays home to its purpose, politics and conspiracies. Personally not enough spunk for me to use it, I can understand how people enjoy it thoughie.
 
The site is explicitly male-only and has rules against "simping" for women. They adamantly insist on not being around women, whom they are very vocal and obsessive in their hatred of. That doesn't exactly sound like heterosexual male behavior to me.
So is Crystal Cafe just as bad? Also go back kiwifarmscuck tranimetard
 
I'm sure you'll find a nice lass one day, Jerry. There's a Geraldine Blevins out there somewhere.

They'd rather talk about Hitler fun facts than have a woman enter and gather orbiters, as female users often do. Just look at users that we've had here in the past, like literallyosakairl, soyjakfan01, or even Sodack, all of whom rather garnered orbiters over time because they were female or attention-whored immediately among joining (Osaka posting her face on her first day here, for example, or X Immigrant trying to DM Sodack off-site and date her). People in these spheres, who are predominately young men, are susceptible to the attention these women put upon themselves by their status of publicly being, well, women.
Thus, I find it logical to desire a lack of distractions from these sorts of users when moderating a forum for discussing politics and conspiracy theories like chuds.life. Disliking female forum users in this internet sphere is not equivalent to having a sexual attraction to men. As I said, I really don't understand how you're equating those two things. You can joke about how "haha, they don't like women so they must all be gay" but I just don't understand how that's logical outside of some jabby humor. I think that their disallowance of women has helped their forum preserve itself, considering the types of discussion that it's focused around.
Again, most of the threads on Chuds.life are about how much they HATE WOMEN. Their brand of extreme, obsessive misogyny simply reeks of deeply closeted homosexuality. And excluding women would be understandable if the site was focused around men's issues, but it is not. It is supposedly a politics forum, so it makes no logical sense for women to be excluded from the site.

So is Crystal Cafe just as bad? Also go back kiwifarmscuck tranimetard
Crystal Cafe is mostly lesbian femcels. That really isn't the own that you think it is. Not to mention, the vast majority of websites are male-dominated, so it's understandable that women would want a few spaces of their own.

Also, I hate Kiwitroons.
 
Again, most of the threads on Chuds.life are about how much they HATE WOMEN.
They really aren't. You're just being dishonest. There are threads on there about a disdain some folk on there have for women, but that isn't actually a main focus of the site. Scroll through the main board "Clown World Logs," and see how long it takes you to count on one hand the amount of threads dedicated to hating women. Ironically, one thread explicitly called "Why do you hate women?" was made by a guy who, in the OP post, says he doesn't hate women, followed by multiple replies from some users saying that they also don't hate them. It isn't a website dedicated to misogyny. I think you've developed this thought under a retarded misconception.
It is supposedly a politics forum, so it makes no logical sense for women to be excluded from the site.
I just explained how it can. From my observations of having been on this place for a year now, women in this sphere are very often going to attract orbiters from some of the userbase who could then detract from a site like chuds.life's original purpose of discussing politics by orbiting these women and their interactions with the site instead of focusing on funky conspiracy theories and whatnot. Sure, maybe such a broad fix as banning all women is what you see as an unwise solution to the issue itself, but it's damn well done its job for them.
 
Back
Top