SoySpotter
idk any more bruh
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2024
- Messages
- 1,946
litterally gonna have to ban half the users if this happensYeah, if I were to allow NSFW content, I'd have to make the site 18+ for legal reasons.
litterally gonna have to ban half the users if this happensYeah, if I were to allow NSFW content, I'd have to make the site 18+ for legal reasons.
Guess I’ll have to waltz off if your kike keister wins the auction
Okay, I've got a better idea:litterally gonna have to ban half the users if this happens
just turn adult swim into adult swimOkay, I've got a better idea:
No porn or gore on most boards. There will be a few boards where such content can be posted, and those boards will be 18+ only. The rest of the site - the SFW part - will be open to underagecacas.
Alright so no NSFW and no pedophiles, we are getting somewhere here. All thats left is for you to say you want me to run things again and we will be on the same team.Okay, I've got a better idea:
No porn or gore on most boards. There will be a few boards where such content can be posted, and those boards will be 18+ only. The rest of the site - the SFW part - will be open to underagecacas.
take a loan, buy the bank with said loan then buy the schlogtake out a loan try that state youll get some kind of return or soemthing like that
why would there be porn or gore anywhere in the first placeNo porn or gore on most boards. There will be a few boards where such content can be posted, and those boards will be 18+ only. The rest of the site - the SFW part - will be open to underagecacas.
better yet, @MoonMetropolis my jewish friend..take a loan, buy the bank with said loan then buy the schlog
oh boy i can't wait for the 'log to be filled with /nate/ tier porn dumps, faggots ruining and derailing every single thread (more than they already do) and the trannies inviting people to their schlogcords because "they arent hecking hostile" in dms, definitely saving the website like this.5. All NSFW images and videos must be spoilered.
And... that's about it. Other than that, go wild.
Nearly every user currently banned would be unbanned. The only ones who would remain banned would be ones like ḅú5ṫ and Ryékrispié - in other words, legit pedophiles and foodists.@MoonMetropolis give me a couple people you would unban so i know how rulelesscucked you're gonna make this place.
sparkles too right?The only ones who would remain banned would be ones like ḅú5ṫ and Ryékrispié - in other words, legit pedophiles and foodists.
i say we unban sparkles or ban every muslimsparkles too right?
this kinda doesn't sound like a good idea nglNearly every user currently banned would be unbanned. The only ones who would remain banned would be ones like ḅú5ṫ and Ryékrispié - in other words, legit pedophiles and foodists.
skill issueanyways, its blocked in my country
do this first good idea you ever had but its never going to happen, if it did id say we keep skibidisigma and warrior 'p because they are gemmyban every muslim
this sounds like a horrible idea, respectfully. We need to value the quality of the site, not the freeze peach.Nearly every user currently banned would be unbanned. The only ones who would remain banned would be ones like ḅú5ṫ and Ryékrispié - in other words, legit pedophiles and foodists.
No. I would unban princessparkles. Her opinions are absolutely horrible, but she is not a legit pedophile. She pretty much just said exactly what her sand dune religion teaches. If I kept her banned, I would have to ban every other Muslim on here as well.sparkles too right?
Censorship never improves the quality of any site. Hell, just look at Reddit and Twitter. Both were at their best when they had almost no rules whatsoever.this sounds like a horrible idea, respectfully. We need to value the quality of the site, not the freeze peach.