>Getting Warrior-Z cancelled from powerscaling by making an exposé video about him being an antisemitic transphobe

normalfags still do
I guess so, though normalfag leftytrannies mostly only hate the imaginary HECKIN' white bigot incel Christian boogeyman. I guess if Warrior-Z hypothetically made a response video to these accusations presented within this hypothetical expose video, he could bring up his faith as a response and a lot of people would accept it.
The REAL damning accusation would be the heckin' anti shemetizm or something in my opinion.
 
Look for it yourself.
I did, there's none.
Nigga is educated in a white country and yet can't escape profound mental retardation.
Lol.
1744136920436.png
 
I guess so, though normalfag leftytrannies mostly only hate the imaginary HECKIN' white bigot incel Christian boogeyman. I guess if Warrior-Z hypothetically made a response video to these accusations presented within this hypothetical expose video, he could bring up his faith as a response or something and a lot of people would accept it.
The REAL damning accusation would be the heckin' anti shemetizm or something in my opinion.
apparently being islamic or whatever is NOT an excuse for biggotry sis
 
yall b talkin bout dimensions and all that cracka ahh shit jitt ong lets js take the LLZZ together bra ong icl ts
 
I'll actually give you lessons on temporal dimensions. Like, you think you know more than me about a subject I've studied??
Retard, it interacts with space in ways that make it integral to how the universe works, not just an isolated, linear dimension.
Yes, it's the 4th dimension of space time. 3 dimensions of space, 1 of time, ergo time is 1 dimensional.
nobody gives a shit
 
I'll actually give you lessons on temporal dimensions. Like, you think you know more than me about a subject I've studied??
I can't wait. Also, isn't argument from authority, non existent in this case, a fallacy?
 
Go ahead and prove I lost when he didnt even engage, also you lost in the other thread lil faggot.
I have the moral highground because I'm a kiwicaca therefore i can be the judge
you lost that debate.
KEEP TAKING LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ, AND KEEP RAGING ON ME!!! YOU LOSE ALL DEBATES! KEEP CRYING ON MY SHOULDER SON!
 
I have the moral highground because I'm a kiwicaca therefore i can be the judge
you lost that debate.
KEEP TAKING LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ, AND KEEP RAGING ON ME!!! YOU LOSE ALL DEBATES! KEEP CRYING ON MY SHOULDER SON!
Go ahead and prove how you being a Kiwiraisin would give you the moral highground.
1744137442449.png

I can't wait. Also, isn't argument from authority, non existent in this case, a fallacy?
I mean, only if the authority in question doesn't have evidence or any substance for what they're saying.
 
I mean, only if the authority in question doesn't have evidence or any substance for what they're saying.
If you could prove that time has 4 dimensions, you'd get a nobel prize in physics, just saying.
 
Prove that source is reliable.
If you could prove that time has 4 dimensions, you'd get a nobel prize in physics, just saying.
Well, I'm arguing from what physicists agree on, a consensus. Which would be deductive reasoning due to the amount of substance there is for saying that this is the likely answer, which we could use Occams razor for.
One Shot, one debate won. Bravo!
He can't win if the dialectic is still going btw.
 
Well, I'm arguing from what physicists agree on, a consensus. Which would be deductive reasoning.
Show this consensus. Either way agreeing with consensus is not deductive reasoning, it's agreeing with consensus.
 
Back
Top