Meta For everyone who hates on Fr✡️✡️t.

[Watt]

Gore should be allowed since it can be funny, especially on /pol/.

It's really not funny, especially on /pol/.

 

[Ytsuken]

It's really not funny, especially on /pol/.

Ev&oe El Patron is funny asf

 

[265121297]

slippery slope into dnbs being posted and nobody wants that

Not really. Actual dnb should probably be banned, but edits and ’jaks are aryan.

It's really not funny, especially on /pol/.

It can be used for good effect when arguing and baiting. But I can admit that it’s usually bad unless used to respond to something. Why is it especially bad on /pol/?

 

[Watt]

Not really. Actual dnb should probably be banned, but edits and ’jaks are aryan.

It can be used for good effect when arguing and baiting. But I can admit that it’s usually bad unless used to respond to something. Why is it especially bad on /pol/?

1.) DNB, including any edits, "jaks" made of it, or "cropped" versions of it are FORBIDDEN
2.) Gore, no matter how "epicly you own le nusois" is FORBIDDEN
3.) BMT is FORBIDDEN

 

[Ytsuken]

1.) DNB, including any edits, "jaks" made of it, or "cropped" versions of it are FORBIDDEN
2.) Gore, no matter how "epicly you own le nusois" is FORBIDDEN

Coal

3.) BMT is FORBIDDEN

Already covered

 

[265121297]

1.) DNB, including any edits, "jaks" made of it, or "cropped" versions of it are FORBIDDEN
2.) Gore, no matter how "epicly you own le nusois" is FORBIDDEN
3.) BMT is FORBIDDEN

1.) Real dnb should be banned. Drawings should not be.
2.) Bad rule go to reddit… no they allow it, go to twitter… no they also allow gore. Go to youtube if you don’t want to see it.
3.) I agree.

 

[jimbo]

Not really. Actual dnb should probably be banned, but edits and ’jaks are aryan.

it just seems really unnecessary to be posted at all, like i'm not trying to hop on the soycuck.farty just to see some dude's shotgun mouthwash or some tranny's dick being chopped off; save that shit for wpd

Real dnb should be banned. Drawings should not be.

drawings OF dnb?

 

[Watt]

1.) Real dnb should be banned. Drawings should not be.
2.) Bad rule go to reddit… no they allow it, go to twitter… no they also allow gore. Go to youtube if you don’t want to see it.
3.) I agree.

1.) >Le drawing of decapitated dead child is le safe and wholesome! It's cool to since he's subhuman brown and he deserved that, and it'll own le newsois.
2.) >It's not like they're alive go back to reddit, no twitter, no YouTube if you don't want to see a guy's head be blown off 52 times in a row
3.) >I agree

 

[265121297]

it just seems really unnecessary to be posted at all, like i'm not trying to hop on the soycuck.farty just to see some dude's shotgun mouthwash or some tranny's dick being chopped off; save that shit for wpd

drawings OF dnb?

I can see that, but as long as baiting people with it is fun, I think it should be allowed. You can’t see gore on the sharty unless you click on it doe, right?

Drawing of dnb, yes. It’s good for baiting and doesn’t attract foodists since they only want to post the real images.

 

[jimbo]

Drawing of dnb, yes.

It’s good for baiting

doesn’t attract foodists

 

[Ytsuken]

View attachment 138740

>regular plier.png

 

[265121297]

1.) >Le drawing of decapitated dead child is le safe and wholesome! It's cool to since he's subhuman brown and he deserved that, and it'll own le newsois.
2.) >It's not like they're alive go back to reddit, no twitter, no YouTube if you don't want to see a guy's head be blown off 52 times in a row
3.) >I agree

1.) I never said that it’s wholesome, just that it’s good for baiting. I also never said that it’s ok because they’re a “subhuman brown”. I support equal opportunity baiting and don’t think skin colour should matter.
2.) My point is that gore isn’t some super taboo foodist thing, but rather something even normies consume. The sharty having stricter rules than mainstream social media seems fucked.

 

[jimbo]

just that it’s good for baiting.

posting child gore whether it's edited or not and passing it off as "bait that'll own the chuds" is the same line of thinking that you see many of the terminally online gen z "ironic" pedophiles have

 

[Ytsuken]

posting child gore whether it's edited or not and passing it off as "bait that'll own the chuds" is the same line of thinking that you see many of the terminally online gen z "ironic" pedophiles have

Hot take: posting DNB is okay

 

[Watt]

1.) I never said that it’s wholesome, just that it’s good for baiting. I also never said that it’s ok because they’re a “subhuman brown”. I support equal opportunity baiting and don’t think skin colour should matter.
2.) My point is that gore isn’t some super taboo foodist thing, but rather something even normies consume. The sharty having stricter rules than mainstream social media seems fucked.

1.) Baiting who.
2.) Gore is a super taboo thing that all foodists enjoy, at least in civilized countries it's morally and just in general wrong, and no normies do not consume gore. The Sharty doesn't have enough rules as is.

 

[265121297]

posting child gore whether it's edited or not and passing it off as "bait that'll own the chuds" is the same line of thinking that you see many of the terminally online gen z "ironic" pedophiles have

It’s not the same because consuming ‘p leads to more ‘p being produced, while posting dnb (especially drawings) doesn’t lead to more dnbs.

 

[Watt]

It’s not the same because consuming ‘p leads to more ‘p being produced, while posting dnb (especially drawings) doesn’t lead to more dnbs.

It's a dead child. Why does a dead child need to be posted anywhere.

Hot take: posting DNB is okay

Out, leave, scram. I don't wanna see you. I don't care what you have to say, skidaddle go away now.

 

[265121297]

1.) Baiting who.
2.) Gore is a super taboo thing that all foodists enjoy, at least in civilized countries it's morally and just in general wrong, and no normies do not consume gore. The Sharty doesn't have enough rules as is.

1.) Baiting anyone I’m arguing with.
2.) didn’t r/watchpeopledie have millions of subscribers before being banned? You can also find tons of accounts all over mainstream social media with hundreds of thousands of followers that post gore. You may think it’s something only watched by a small amount of foodists, but it’s popular among the general population, even if they won’t admit it.

 

[265121297]

It's a dead child. Why does a dead child need to be posted anywhere.

I’ve already said that I don’t support posting pictures of real dead kids. The character in a drawing is not a child, it is nothing more than some pixels on a screen.

 

[jimbo]

It’s not the same because consuming ‘p leads to more ‘p being produced, while posting dnb (especially drawings) doesn’t lead to more dnbs.

it might not but it'll still attract the same crowd of pedo zoomers that all these cliques are infested with. their main gimmicks are just spamming people with child/animal gore and allowing for stuff like that to be posted is just an enabler

The character in a drawing is not a child, it is nothing more than some pixels on a screen.

pixels on a screen that's resembling a dead child, yea