- Joined
- Dec 12, 2024
- Messages
- 2,079
i think we can all agree that raping dogs is objectively immoral
Who says that people are on a higher level than animals?but we are on a different level than animals, many mammals do possess morality, it's that we're just one step above in the way that we can recognize what is objectively good and what is bad
tsmt, we’re just better at rationalizing our instincts.Who says that people are on a higher level than animals?
our higher intellect says we areWho says that people are on a higher level than animals?
So its your subjective thought, and you think you can believe in objective morality without a higher power.our higher intellect says we are
objective morality doesn't need to be based in religionSo its your subjective thought, and you think you can believe in objective morality without a higher power.
nietzsche was a clittycel gegView attachment 137752
nietzsche won
Higher power as in the one from narcotic anonymous?So its your subjective thought, and you think you can believe in objective morality without a higher power.
Because someone's pipes have burst asunderWhy is there an "i rape kids" option
If you say no you rape kidsWhy is there an "i rape kids" option
Well, last I checked, religious people rape children at much higher rates than atheists do, so clearly the book telling them not to doesn't make much of a difference anyways.They are weak minded. They need a book to tell them to not rape children, otherwise they might just do it KEEEEK