• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

Chud Do you hate fags or dykes more?

>My prophet raped a 9 year old when he was 53
View attachment 165358

<My god impregnated a 12-16 year old
View attachment 165359

>We are authorities on sexual morality
<We are authorities on sexual morality

I'm not listening to you lol.
>Hmmm that makes me think what's the a version of Christianity that doesn't have jesus-
>wait that's the worst one you fucking retard
10002.gif
 
Women are less pathetic when they fall for these things because they are usually weaker in the head, so it is easier to forgive them.
I don't think that's true. Women tend to be more passive and group-think oriented but that's not the same as being weaker. Women are really good at making support groups because they're naturally more social. If the situation and leaders around then are bad, they'll succumb to the groupthink, but if the leaders are inspirational then they will be inspired too. Women are rarely good at being independent leaders because of this, but that's not the same as being weak.
 
I need myself a misandrist wife.
You really don't.
If the situation and leaders around then are bad, they'll succumb to the groupthink
This is what I would define as "weak," which is why I believe we simply have different perceptions around such a term. I don't mean it in a derogatory sense, of course. The minds of women are "weak" in the sense that they are susceptible to the errors that can come from this "groupthink" at a rate higher than men, as you've pointed out. This is why I have said that it is, then, easier to forgive them, for they are naturally disposed to that behavior at this higher rate.
That they are "weak" isn't to say that they are retarded or otherwise incapable of complex, intellectual thought, however. Rather, it is that such intellectual thought in a woman's mind has a more delicate foundation than the minds of men, so the minds of women can get flipped around and fiddled with more easily. Think of lighter and heavier ships on the open sea. It isn't the best analogy, but it explains the relationship well.
With lighter ones, you can travel quickly and in efficient groups, yet they are susceptible to the hefty waves that push them around easily on the sea. With something heavier, like a galleon, you have a stabler course, but travel is going to take a long while. Either have their benefits. Like I once read from a holy man who was writing on the topic of marriage and the differences in the minds of men and women, the "gas and brakes" that are the two sexes are both necessary for structure to exist in mankind.
 
This is what I would define as "weak," which is why I believe we simply have different perceptions around such a term. I don't mean it in a derogatory sense, of course. The minds of women are "weak" in the sense that they are susceptible to the errors that can come from this "groupthink" at a rate higher than men, as you've pointed out. This is why I have said that it is, then, easier to forgive them, for they are naturally disposed to that behavior at this higher rate.
Is this predisposition to falling for groupthink the reason women are more likely to be active in churches than men as well?
 
You really don't.
aw cmon why not? I'm sure she'll love me
You really don't.

This is what I would define as "weak," which is why I believe we simply have different perceptions around such a term. I don't mean it in a derogatory sense, of course. The minds of women are "weak" in the sense that they are susceptible to the errors that can come from this "groupthink" at a rate higher than men, as you've pointed out. This is why I have said that it is, then, easier to forgive them, for they are naturally disposed to that behavior at this higher rate.
That they are "weak" isn't to say that they are retarded or otherwise incapable of complex, intellectual thought, however. Rather, it is that such intellectual thought in a woman's mind has a more delicate foundation than the minds of men, so the minds of women can get flipped around and fiddled with more easily. Think of lighter and heavier ships on the open sea. It isn't the best analogy, but it explains the relationship well.
With lighter ones, you can travel quickly and in efficient groups, yet they are susceptible to the hefty waves that push them around easily on the sea. With something heavier, like a galleon, you have a stabler course, but travel is going to take a long while. Either have their benefits. Like I once read from a holy man who was writing on the topic of marriage and the differences in the minds of men and women, the "gas and brakes" that are the two sexes are both necessary for structure to exist in mankind.
>isn't to say that they are retarded or otherwise incapable of complex, intellectual thought
evendoe they are.
 
I don't think that's true. Women tend to be more passive and group-think oriented but that's not the same as being weaker. Women are really good at making support groups because they're naturally more social. If the situation and leaders around then are bad, they'll succumb to the groupthink, but if the leaders are inspirational then they will be inspired too. Women are rarely good at being independent leaders because of this, but that's not the same as being weak.
Is that why you’re an apeish pooner
 
Is this predisposition to falling for groupthink the reason women are more likely to be active in churches than men as well?
I wouldn't say that's the whole reason, but I do think that could be a part of it. Good observation.
aw cmon why not? I'm sure she'll love me
Why would you want a woman who hates men to be your lover?
 
Back
Top