Debunking that aisha underage

Warrior-Z said:
Never gonna get BTFO'd here, I will literally never give up responding. Never.
Click to expand...
>i will never stop defending my sandnigger pedo cult
esl.jpg
 
>You don't have to be a historian to have evidence and knowledge within history then confirm it, RETARD. It's backed up by historians themselves, historians teach theologians. And I can define a non sequitur.
You do if you wish your work to be reliable and characteristic of something that would be cited to make an argument for an historical narrative. I'm not interested in reading through sandnigger babble to figure out if they themselves on paper thing that their prophet is a pedophile, simple fact is that in reality they believe it, and that in reality xhe was a pedonigger, you're literally just coping by doing hadithmaths
>Yes, I do? I can give you some right now.
Meds you aren't old enough to have a university account how would you even access a journal
>Never did this.
Even doe you people are literally copy paste NPC people therefore you did do this
>Quran never said this and this is thourugly debunked, your arguments consist of a misrepresentation of the Quran itself.
Deliberately misrepresented the point award
Nobody gives a shit what you would personally like to inrepret from da keran because there is always in practise a tendency towards slavery and child sex abuse
>When was I anti-western again? And I am
Supporting pisslam terrorist cells like isis and hezbollah and hamas and houthis, or iran, demonstrates a complete lack of moral standing even in your own framework of the theoretical arbitrary interpretations of that book of lies. You don't give a shit about the famines in yemen, or the hundreds of thousands of syrians being attacked by assad with chemical weapons, or assad going into lebanon to kill PLO members, or hamas putting their military installations in civilian apartment complexes and threating civilians into staying, because they're vaguely on iran's side, and they vaguely virtue signal about being anti-israel, and that's good enough for you because of how much of an obsessed anti-israel NPC you are
 
Goldy said:
>i will never stop defending my sandnigger pedo cult
View attachment 69449
Click to expand...

Alextremo2TheMax said:
>You don't have to be a historian to have evidence and knowledge within history then confirm it, RETARD. It's backed up by historians themselves, historians teach theologians. And I can define a non sequitur.
You do if you wish your work to be reliable and characteristic of something that would be cited to make an argument for an historical narrative. I'm not interested in reading through sandnigger babble to figure out if they themselves on paper thing that their prophet is a pedophile, simple fact is that in reality they believe it, and that in reality xhe was a pedonigger, you're literally just coping by doing hadithmaths
>Yes, I do? I can give you some right now.
Meds you aren't old enough to have a university account how would you even access a journal
>Never did this.
Even doe you people are literally copy paste NPC people therefore you did do this
>Quran never said this and this is thourugly debunked, your arguments consist of a misrepresentation of the Quran itself.
Deliberately misrepresented the point award
Nobody gives a shit what you would personally like to inrepret from da keran because there is always in practise a tendency towards slavery and child sex abuse
>When was I anti-western again? And I am
Supporting pisslam terrorist cells like isis and hezbollah and hamas and houthis, or iran, demonstrates a complete lack of moral standing even in your own framework of the theoretical arbitrary interpretations of that book of lies. You don't give a shit about the famines in yemen, or the hundreds of thousands of syrians being attacked by assad with chemical weapons, or assad going into lebanon to kill PLO members, or hamas putting their military installations in civilian apartment complexes and threating civilians into staying, because they're vaguely on iran's side, and they vaguely virtue signal about being anti-israel, and that's good enough for you because of how much of an obsessed anti-israel NPC you are
Click to expand...
>You don't have to be a historian to have evidence and knowledge within history then confirm it, RETARD. It's backed up by historians themselves, historians teach theologians. And I can define a non sequitur.
>You do if you wish your work to be reliable
Yeah and who said that theologians are supposed to do the same work as historians when both of them do different jobs THAT support each other? And it's not only based off of arguments, it's also empirical evidence that matters.
>I'm not interested in reading through sandnigger babble to figure out if they themselves on paper
I can do it for you and I have multiple PDFs and books that debunk said claim. And "hadithmaths" are necessary for Islamic history and teachings, retard. There's no coping, you're just being delusional.
>Meds you aren't old enough to have a university account
Blud doesn't know how easy you can access PDF archives.
>NPC
Says the tranime pfp.
>Deliberately misrepresented the point award
And what did I misrepresent? Also no, the Quran goes against that so do the hadiths, retard.
>Supporting pisslam terrorist cells like isis
I don't support ISIS?
>demonstrates a complete lack of moral standing even in your own framework of the theoretical arbitrary interpretations of that book of lies.
Presupposing its a book of lies when you're refusing to debate in VC because you're too much of a pussy.
>You don't give a shit about the famines in yemen,
I do.
>hamas putting their military installations in civilian apartment complexes and threating civilians into staying, because they're vaguely on iran's side,
That's debunked.
HELL NAH BRO GOT COOKED WHILE IT'S 5 AM FOR ME 💀☠️
 
Hamas_2 said:
Image
View attachment 27595im just gonna go here to debunk some claims that aisha is 9, basically
The well-known historian Ibn Jareer al-Tabari writes at page 50 of volume 4 of his 'Book of History': "Abu Bakr married two ladies in the days of ignorance. Fateelah daughter of Abd al-Aza was the first, from whom Abdullah and Asma were born. Umm-i-Rooman was the second, from whom Abd al-Rahman and Aisha were born. All the four children of Abu Bakr were born in the days of ignorance from the above-named two ladies.
It is a well-known fact of history, that Abu Bakr’s son Abd al-Rahman fought against the Muslims in the battle of Badr. His age at that time was 21-22 years, and although he was older than Aisha, there is no evidence to show that the difference between their ages was more than three or four years. This fact lends support to the view that Aisha was born four or five years before the Call.
Now we know that Aisha was engaged by prophet Muhammad (p) in around 11th year of call (i.e.around 620 ad ) and consummated by marriage after three years i.e., around 623-624 a.d.. Now do the calculation the calculation . In 623 when Aisha’s brother was 21-22 , at that time Aisha (r) was not less than 18-19 years .
Hence when Prophet Muhammad (p) engaged her in 620 ad she was around 16-17 years . Almost after 2-3 years Prophet (p) married her and took her to his home , which tends her age finally around 19
Click to expand...
This issue is so contentious that any academic weighing in on it would have extreme biases, so making appeals to authority is pretty retarded thoughy
 
Replied to wrong post don't know how to use this forum layout sorry goys
 
Warrior-Z said:
Then why'd you say you were?

>So you think that a person who engages or is an expert in Islamic theology wouldn't have a level of authority on the historical aspects when in order to be an Islamic theologian you'd need to know the history since its a crucial part? Thats a non sequitur.
>Yes I don't think they do considering they're not a historian.
You don't have to be a historian to have evidence and knowledge within history then confirm it, RETARD. It's backed up by historians themselves, historians teach theologians. And I can define a non sequitur.
>you people don't cite historical journals
Yes, I do? I can give you some right now.
>you cite islamic debate society youtube channels and "lectures" by convert shills
Never did this.
>Apparently no muslim society ever has bothered to read their little book
Quran never said this and this is thourugly debunked, your arguments consist of a misrepresentation of the Quran itself.
>you're not that kind of muslim, you're a generic anti-western-but-living-in-the-west
When was I anti-western again? And I am
>muslims that represent western principles better are the same people you would write off as zionist puppets
Yeah no because those aren't zionist qualities.
Click to expand...
warrior 'p so fat if he eats one more bait he will explode
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top