• Site is being failraided (they're DOSing us and it's not working)
    >3000 guests while about 30 users are active

Debunking that aisha underage

Post thread
Hamas_2 said:
Image
View attachment 27595im just gonna go here to debunk some claims that aisha is 9, basically
The well-known historian Ibn Jareer al-Tabari writes at page 50 of volume 4 of his 'Book of History': "Abu Bakr married two ladies in the days of ignorance. Fateelah daughter of Abd al-Aza was the first, from whom Abdullah and Asma were born. Umm-i-Rooman was the second, from whom Abd al-Rahman and Aisha were born. All the four children of Abu Bakr were born in the days of ignorance from the above-named two ladies.
It is a well-known fact of history, that Abu Bakr’s son Abd al-Rahman fought against the Muslims in the battle of Badr. His age at that time was 21-22 years, and although he was older than Aisha, there is no evidence to show that the difference between their ages was more than three or four years. This fact lends support to the view that Aisha was born four or five years before the Call.
Now we know that Aisha was engaged by prophet Muhammad (p) in around 11th year of call (i.e.around 620 ad ) and consummated by marriage after three years i.e., around 623-624 a.d.. Now do the calculation the calculation . In 623 when Aisha’s brother was 21-22 , at that time Aisha (r) was not less than 18-19 years .
Hence when Prophet Muhammad (p) engaged her in 620 ad she was around 16-17 years . Almost after 2-3 years Prophet (p) married her and took her to his home , which tends her age finally around 19
Click to expand...
Nobody is interested in arguing the peculiarities of some faggot book written by a shitskin who lied to gain power.
It literally doesn't matter. Non muslims (human beings) aren't concerned with whether or not some shitskin fucked a 9 year old. What matters is whether or not the main body of the religion believes it happened, whether or not they think it's justified by some form of cope or epistemological grounding on a false revelation (a lie), and how their activities as informed by those beliefs affect the world.
As it stands muzzies have the biggest track record of slavery, sex trafficking, and child sex abuse across time than any other group of magnitude to come into contact with europe and the mediterranean. It's not just in a matter of frequency that they're guilty of this but in that it's a core tenet of how the religion operates. Go to any MENA npc or arab sheikh and they'll drown you with a myriad of copes and ad homs as to why a 50 year old fucking a 9 year old can actually be LE GOOD. They'll confer with eachother in their little legalese (almost judaic) circles discussing "shariah law" and justify to eachother why it's okay to conquer other countries, take slaves, rape those slaves, and wholly subjugate other groups.
Not that the affects of this are unique, just that these properties inherent, subversive and puts them categorically as an eternal hostile enemy to all europeans, whites and christians who don't want to be ruled by the arbitrary whims of some shitskin in the hejaz with a legal and military framework perpetuated by the most obvious obnoxious basic sins and temptations.
 
Alextremo2TheMax said:
Nobody is interested in arguing the peculiarities of some faggot book written by a shitskin who lied to gain power.
It literally doesn't matter. Non muslims (human beings) aren't concerned with whether or not some shitskin fucked a 9 year old. What matters is whether or not the main body of the religion believes it happened, whether or not they think it's justified by some form of cope or epistemological grounding on a false revelation (a lie), and how their activities as informed by those beliefs affect the world.
As it stands muzzies have the biggest track record of slavery, sex trafficking, and child sex abuse across time than any other group of magnitude to come into contact with europe and the mediterranean. It's not just in a matter of frequency that they're guilty of this but in that it's a core tenet of how the religion operates. Go to any MENA npc or arab sheikh and they'll drown you with a myriad of copes and ad homs as to why a 50 year old fucking a 9 year old can actually be LE GOOD. They'll confer with eachother in their little legalese (almost judaic) circles discussing "shariah law" and justify to eachother why it's okay to conquer other countries, take slaves, rape those slaves, and wholly subjugate other groups.
Not that the affects of this are unique, just that these properties inherent, subversive and puts them categorically as an eternal hostile enemy to all europeans, whites and christians who don't want to be ruled by the arbitrary whims of some shitskin in the hejaz with a legal and military framework perpetuated by the most obvious obnoxious basic sins and temptations.
Click to expand...
Just because you come from a Muslim majority country doesn't mean you're a Muslim, many Arabs aren't Muslim and this thread literally debunks how Aisha isn't 9
 
Alextremo2TheMax said:
Nobody is interested in arguing the peculiarities of some faggot book written by a shitskin who lied to gain power.
It literally doesn't matter. Non muslims (human beings) aren't concerned with whether or not some shitskin fucked a 9 year old. What matters is whether or not the main body of the religion believes it happened, whether or not they think it's justified by some form of cope or epistemological grounding on a false revelation (a lie), and how their activities as informed by those beliefs affect the world.
As it stands muzzies have the biggest track record of slavery, sex trafficking, and child sex abuse across time than any other group of magnitude to come into contact with europe and the mediterranean. It's not just in a matter of frequency that they're guilty of this but in that it's a core tenet of how the religion operates. Go to any MENA npc or arab sheikh and they'll drown you with a myriad of copes and ad homs as to why a 50 year old fucking a 9 year old can actually be LE GOOD. They'll confer with eachother in their little legalese (almost judaic) circles discussing "shariah law" and justify to eachother why it's okay to conquer other countries, take slaves, rape those slaves, and wholly subjugate other groups.
Not that the affects of this are unique, just that these properties inherent, subversive and puts them categorically as an eternal hostile enemy to all europeans, whites and christians who don't want to be ruled by the arbitrary whims of some shitskin in the hejaz with a legal and military framework perpetuated by the most obvious obnoxious basic sins and temptations.
Click to expand...
>plugs his ears and engages with anti-intellectualism in order to keep his pre existing biases
Kaffir sisters... Are we retarded?
 
Back
Top