SUPERHELL Ban megathread

[X Immigrant]

Does Miss Circle's or Averi's breast milk taste better?

 

[Steve]

Putting up with furfags sure as hell beats putting up with jannies given free reign to abuse their powers and ban anyone they don't like.

Trust me if we were allowed to ban people we don't like you wouldn't see some people here every day, and admins can do as they wish so that's out of the scope of the question. You don't want a shlog without a little bit of nigger mod abuse because that's the entire quality control process. Its also why we have the /dump/ subforum to begin with, to get rid of the trash threads.

 

[Fagon]

Putting up with furfags sure as hell beats putting up with jannies given free reign to abuse their powers and ban anyone they don't like.

No, it doesn't.

 

[1844 or Something]

I honestly feel like this is just an excuse to get rid of him when he didn't break any rules.

Well, being a sexual degenerate is a user-approved rule and he was posting about wanting to get fucked by a horse. I'm not sure why he was ever unbanned in the first place.

 

[X Immigrant]

If reaction spamming is against the rules, then the rules should say so. The rules currently don't say anything about it. I also don't see how it could possibly justify a permaban without any kind of warning being given. The poster in this case being recently unbanned for something completely unrelated is irrelevant. If @pipp is going to be banned for reaction spamming, then it certainly should not be a permaban, there should be an explicit rule against reaction spamming, and the rule should be enforced equally among all users (not just enforced on particularly annoying users who nobody likes).

I honestly feel like this is just an excuse to get rid of him when he didn't break any rules. Just like what Steve did to him before, which is why he had been banned in the first place.


See above.

Moon, seethe all you want, but completely allowing these types of people on this site ended with me, a long time ago. Degenerates have been getting banned on here since last year. Best accept it.

 

[1844 or Something]

Best accept it.

TSMT. If admins want to ban people they don't like, posting a paragraph about it isn't going to change things.
Either leave the site because it's rulecucked or accept that jannies are going to do what they want.

 

[MoonMetropolis]

Because it gives the site some quality control instead of letting annoying coal posters on the site. Ittsa good rule unless you want to see autistic threads asking if ms circle or averis breast milk tastes better.

Yes, I would much rather have to see garbage like that than have the site be a rulescucked shithole where jannies can arbitrarily ban anyone they don't like for no good reason.

Trust me if we were allowed to ban people we don't like you wouldn't see some people here every day, and admins can do as they wish so that's out of the scope of the question. You don't want a shlog without a little bit of nigger mod abuse because that's the entire quality control process. Its also why we have the /dump/ subforum to begin with, to get rid of the trash threads.

Quality control should not be the job of jannies. It's a slippery slope to turning the site into Reddit, where nearly all posts are removed for supposedly violating some extreme vague and nebulous rule. Also, moving threads to /dump/ is not the same as removing threads entirely and it is certainly not the same as banning people.

 

[Watt]

Yes, I would much rather have to see garbage like that than have the site be a rulescucked shithole where jannies can arbitrarily ban anyone they don't like for no good reason.


Quality control should not be the job of jannies. It's a slippery slope to turning the site into Reddit, where nearly all posts are removed for supposedly violating some extreme vague and nebulous rule. Also, moving threads to /dump/ is not the same as removing threads entirely and it is certainly not the same as banning people.

1.) no
2.) Quality control is quite literally part of the reason Jannies exist
3.) some people just need to be banned

 

[MoonMetropolis]

1.) no
2.) Quality control is quite literally part of the reason Jannies exist
3.) some people just need to be banned

Chuds.life exists for a reason. This is not chuds.life. The soysphere has always been a complete zoo filled with freaks and weirdos. If you can't handle seeing freaks and weirdos, then the soysphere is not for you.

 

[Watt]

Chuds.life exists for a reason. This is not chuds.life. The soysphere has always been a complete zoo filled with freaks and weirdos. If you can't handle seeing freaks and weirdos, then the soysphere is not for you.

Oh but it isn’t full of freaks and weirdos (besides Jimbo) the Jannies made sure to get rid of them, like how they’re supposed to.

 

[MoonMetropolis]

Oh but it isn’t full of freaks and weirdos

Yeah, you're right. The soysphere is totally just a bunch of normal, ordinary people making normal, ordinary posts about normal, ordinary topics. Definitely no weird shit.

Imagine being this delusional.

 

[Username:Required]

The soysphere has always been a complete zoo filled with freaks and weirdos.

Yeah but some are better than others. I’ll take the usual sharty shizos then the /trash/ immigrant furfags as the former is funny while the latter is just an annoying degenerate.

 

[Watt]

Yeah, you're right. The soysphere is totally just a bunch of normal, ordinary people making normal, ordinary posts about normal, ordinary topics. Definitely no weird shit.

Imagine being this delusional.

We’re talking about the schlog buster brown, and notice how you’re aloof no ban policy would actually just result in every braindead moron turning this into the Sharty

 

[MoonMetropolis]

We’re talking about the schlog buster brown, and notice how you’re aloof no ban policy would actually just result in every braindead moron turning this into the Sharty

Oh, heavens no. Why would we ever want Soyjak Blog to be anything like Soyjak Party, the site that it's an extension of?

 

[Watt]

Oh, heavens no. Why would we ever want Soyjak Blog to be anything like Soyjak Party, the site that it's an extension of?

Exactly the point. And never banning anybody ever, no matter how degrading they are, just so “muh rulecucking” doesn’t happen will turn the blog into the Sharty

 

[X Immigrant]

Exactly the point. And never banning anybody ever, no matter how degrading they are, just so “muh rulecucking” doesn’t happen will turn the blog into the Sharty

They're gegbulls buddy, you're supposed to point and laugh.
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MY PROFILE WAS SPAMMED BY THEM WAAAAAHHH
Retard

 

[Twostripe]

Anyways you can just be normal and you wouldn't get banned. Too easy.

 

[Pepsilord]

I hate libertarians so much

 

[Chimperator]

Steve be like:

 

[Username:Required]

We’re talking about the schlog buster brown, and notice how you’re aloof no ban policy would actually just result in every braindead moron turning this into the Sharty

Nigger dont act like your at all normal compared to the sharty. This site is made up of sharty /qa/ immigrant (troonslop fags) shemmailes (massive faggots).
Half of this site love to admit how much they like forcing their autistic FOTM slop, or genuinely enjoy that shit.
The best users on this site (or any soy site in general) were the schizos or “freaks” see @BLACKHAWK.