Meta Ban @lettuce

Just ban VPN's from the shclauwihg and it really becomes a whole lot easier to tell who's who.
The privacy benefits of allowing VPNs probably outweighs the negatives. Jannies should just be more proactive about sweeping up low quality threads and derailment posts.
 
Just ban VPN's from the shclauwihg and it really becomes a whole lot easier to tell who's who.
Do not do this, the downsides of VPN use on a forum are much less significant than on an image board and I am glad that it is allowed
 
The privacy benefits of allowing VPNs probably outweighs the negatives. Jannies should just be more proactive about sweeping up low quality threads and derailment posts.
Do not do this, the downsides of VPN use on a forum are much less significant than on an image board and I am glad that it is allowed
Well I mean some of these alts are of guys who we really, really, really don't want here. So either they find a new way to ignore VPNS in a way they can tell alt from regular user, or it's just tough luck, you can blame the people who used VPN's for wrongdoing and got them banned.
treeeeeeeeeee.png
 
Well I mean some of these alts are of guys who we really, really, really don't want here. So either they find a new way to ignore VPNS in a way they can tell alt from regular user, or it's just tough luck, you can blame the people who used VPN's for wrongdoing and got them banned.
View attachment 137544
Regardless of what happens, I will continue to use mullvad while using the Schlog.
 
If we banned people whose posts ruined the site's quality, jimbo would have been banned months ago.
Well I was more referring to pedophiles and the like who seem to be very keen to ban evade, but banning annoying people also works.
 
also i dotn rly get why i would appeal if i actually did it which i did
 
Back
Top