Hell regarding the latest ban scandal

[Jackson]

no, we did NOT unban everyone, i dont know why but users can view their profiles now, here's proof they're still banned:

as a bonus, i'm making the ban list public again later, look out for that.

 

[Stephen]

as a bonus, i'm making the ban list public again later, look out for that.

Let's go! Dramahaters BTFO!

 

[Jackson]

Let's go! Dramahaters BTFO!

on the condition it doesn't become the blogs main focus again like it did last time, surely the soyim are good goys who have learned their lesson. i have faith in you guys

 

[Stephen]

on the condition it doesn't become the blogs main focus again like it did last time, surely the soyim are good goys who have learned their lesson. i have faith in you guys

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Dramalovers btfo...

 

[alonso]

on the condition it doesn't become the blogs main focus again like it did last time, surely the soyim are good goys who have learned their lesson. i have faith in you guys

We promise Jackson

 

[Chvd33p]

IF they were truly unbanned, don't you idiots think they wouldn't be posting their garbage everywhere like if they're demons released out of a Pandora's box or something? Imagine calling that a scandal just because you can leak on their profiles now... Is logic a myth now?

 

[Jackson]

ban list is public, ban megathread unlocked. if yall cant behave im gonna revert this decision so be good goys

 

[alonso]

ban list is public, ban megathread unlocked. if yall cant behave im gonna revert this decision so be good goys

>You do not have permission to view this page or perform this action

 

[Jackson]

>You do not have permission to view this page or perform this action

huh? hold on let me fix that

 

[Jackson]

done

 

[bowl]

braaap

 

[MoonMetropolis]

Real democracy is about placing limits on power, not about mob rule. We already tried letting the site's admins just ban anyone who they personally disliked, and that, unsurprisingly, didn't work out. @Soyteen Liker did absolutely nothing to warrant a ban; @Froot just personally disliked her, which is not grounds for a ban on any democratic forum (and neither is most users disliking someone). There needs to be a clear set of rules - with as few rules as possible - and only users who actually violate those rules should be banned.

Most of the people currently banned should be unbanned, even if they are unpopular. Only people who did seriously egregious shit should remain banned.

 

[Stephen]

Real democracy is about placing limits on power, not about mob rule. We already tried letting the site's admins just ban anyone who they personally disliked, and that, unsurprisingly, didn't work out. @Soyteen Liker did absolutely nothing to warrant a ban; @Froot just personally disliked her, which is not grounds for a ban on any democratic forum (and neither is most users disliking someone). There needs to be a clear set of rules - with as few rules as possible - and only users who actually violate those rules should be banned.

Most of the people currently banned should be unbanned, even if they are unpopular. Only people who did seriously egregious shit should remain banned.

Very true, unpopular users who dont break rules should stay
I dont find the collective power high from getting niggers nobody likes banned very rewarding, especially once it becomes less justified to do so which it inevitably does

 

[Watt]

Real democracy is about placing limits on power, not about mob rule. We already tried letting the site's admins just ban anyone who they personally disliked, and that, unsurprisingly, didn't work out. @Soyteen Liker did absolutely nothing to warrant a ban; @Froot just personally disliked her, which is not grounds for a ban on any democratic forum (and neither is most users disliking someone). There needs to be a clear set of rules - with as few rules as possible - and only users who actually violate those rules should be banned.

Most of the people currently banned should be unbanned, even if they are unpopular. Only people who did seriously egregious shit should remain banned.

Yea but who cares about democracy. Keep them all banned

 

[Mongoloigul]

no, we did NOT unban everyone, i dont know why but users can view their profiles now, here's proof they're still banned:
View attachment 182548

View attachment 182550

as a bonus, i'm making the ban list public again later, look out for that.

Why is Shitturko banned? What did he do to get banned?

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

Very true, unpopular users who dont break rules should stay
I dont find the collective power high from getting niggers nobody likes banned very rewarding, especially once it becomes less justified to do so which it inevitably does

meursault tried taking this site and the other one down

 

[Pepsilord]

Soyteen liker is the brimstone that killed the schlog, she should stay banned

 

[MoonMetropolis]

Soyteen liker is the brimstone that killed the schlog, she should stay banned

Soyteen Liker violated no rules. Just because you don't like someone doesn't mean that we should ban them. Banning people - especially permabanning them - should be reserved strictly for people who actually did something worthy of it. I don't give a flying fuck if two adults on here are e-dating.

 

[MoonMetropolis]

>Redditor react

Ummm, sweaty, banning anyone that you personally dislike is the most Redditor thing imaginable.

 

[Watt]

Soyteen Liker violated no rules. Just because you don't like someone doesn't mean that we should ban them. Banning people - especially permabanning them - should be reserved strictly for people who actually did something worthy of it. I don't give a flying fuck if two adults on here are e-dating.

Even though xe did