ITS THE END OF THE SHLOG AS WE KNOW IT AND I FEEL FINE

The Google Document in question contains the argument and evidence, hows that cowardice?
It's gish galloping. You present a ton of arguments without writing them yourselves because you know that I'm not going to take the time to read and refute them all. If you were brave you would type out the best evidence yourself.
@265121297 You're already getting slapped up son.
Nigga it's been 3 minutes.
 
@265121297 KEEP TAKING LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ KEEP RUNNING FROM ME SON, PATHETIC ASS CUCK GOT SLUMPED WIT HIS BF NAMED @meijak
 
It's gish galloping. You present a ton of arguments without writing them yourselves because you know that I'm not going to take the time to read and refute them all.
The definition of a gish gallop would essentially be a rhetorical move, I am not trying to be rhetorical here when I am focusing on the substance.
Since the formatting of dialectic is text, you'd obviously have time to go through these and make refutations for the argument, we haven't agreed on a burden of rejoinder so no.
If you were brave you would type out the best evidence yourself.
In which is typed out within the doc.
Nigga it's been 3 minutes.
Cope bitch.
 
You niggas cant go one thread without derailing it into some bs, no wonder were the laughing stock of the soysphere
Didn't this thread run it's course a long time ago? Also lucky me, I'm a booruteen and not a schlogloser.
 
The definition of a gish gallop would essentially be a rhetorical move, I am not trying to be rhetorical here when I am focusing on the substance.
Since the formatting of dialectic is text, you'd obviously have time to go through these and make refutations for the argument, we haven't agreed on a burden of rejoinder so no.

In which is typed out within the doc.

Cope bitch.
This might have been a valid argument if you didn't claim victory when it take me 3 minutes to respond.

You didn't type that.

I'm not coping. I'm laughing at you.
 
The definition of a gish gallop would essentially be a rhetorical move, I am not trying to be rhetorical here when I am focusing on the substance.
Since the formatting of dialectic is text, you'd obviously have time to go through these and make refutations for the argument, we haven't agreed on a burden of rejoinder so no.

In which is typed out within the doc.

Cope bitch.
You take this site too seriously
 
Yeah I bought it
Cffffff
1740048419797t.gif
 
Back
Top