• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

VOTE! The REAL Thrembo....

Who Is The Real Thrembo?

  • ThremboSchlog (me, Warrior-Z's fourth very white wife and legal slave. Descendant of Adolf Hitler)

    Votes: 6 11.5%
  • Thrembo88 (Ϫ Whitest option Ϫ)

    Votes: 17 32.7%
  • thrembolone (valid turkroachxista 🏳️‍⚧️🇹🇷🪳)

    Votes: 15 28.8%
  • Thrembo (LITERAL PEDOPHILE)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 6ixthrembo

    Votes: 7 13.5%
  • JOON TROON KIKES ARE FAGGOTS I DID NOT ADD THAT FIRST OPTION, JANNIES REVERSE THAT KIKE

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • condolana

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • https://blog.soyjak.st/attachments/c7e27d734b4d29fb55e651d6e5b9b5366e56b858_hq-jpg.172731/

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • Jannies are faggots I never added the extra shit in the top response they're just being obsessed

    Votes: 1 1.9%

  • Total voters
    52
That is a direct response to your question. Are you retarded? I just gave a single reply and the reasoning on why I cut it off for you stupid.
I asked chatgpt if internet arguments are a waste of time or not and this what it said...
Internet arguments can often feel like a waste of time for a few key reasons:


  1. Anonymity and Distance: The lack of face-to-face interaction makes it easier for people to be dismissive, rude, or overly confrontational without the social repercussions they would face in person. This often escalates tension rather than fostering productive dialogue.
  2. Echo Chambers: Many people surround themselves with like-minded individuals online. In these spaces, arguments become less about exchanging perspectives and more about reinforcing existing beliefs. It's rare for someone to genuinely change their views in a heated argument, especially when they're surrounded by people who already agree with them.
  3. Lack of Nuance: Online platforms typically favor short, punchy exchanges rather than deep, thoughtful discussions. This leads to oversimplified arguments where complex issues are reduced to soundbites, leaving little room for nuance or understanding.
  4. Emotional Reactions: Internet arguments often turn emotional quickly, and when people get too invested in "winning" or proving a point, the conversation shifts from a rational discussion to a battle of egos. This makes it harder to actually engage in meaningful dialogue.
  5. Time-Consuming: Many online arguments drag on without any resolution, with participants repeating their points over and over. It can quickly become a frustrating cycle where no one is listening, and no one is learning.
  6. Trolls and Bad Faith Actors: Some people engage in internet arguments not to have a real conversation, but simply to provoke others. They may twist your words, spread misinformation, or just try to get under your skin for amusement. Engaging with these individuals is often a pointless exercise.

In the end, internet arguments can drain energy, increase stress, and rarely lead to meaningful outcomes. It’s often more beneficial to step back and focus on real-world conversations where there's a chance for more depth and understanding.
For your own sake, STOP.
 
I don't have to, I'm white.
Prove it.
I asked chatgpt if internet arguments are a waste of time or not and this what it said...
Internet arguments can often feel like a waste of time for a few key reasons:


  1. Anonymity and Distance: The lack of face-to-face interaction makes it easier for people to be dismissive, rude, or overly confrontational without the social repercussions they would face in person. This often escalates tension rather than fostering productive dialogue.
  2. Echo Chambers: Many people surround themselves with like-minded individuals online. In these spaces, arguments become less about exchanging perspectives and more about reinforcing existing beliefs. It's rare for someone to genuinely change their views in a heated argument, especially when they're surrounded by people who already agree with them.
  3. Lack of Nuance: Online platforms typically favor short, punchy exchanges rather than deep, thoughtful discussions. This leads to oversimplified arguments where complex issues are reduced to soundbites, leaving little room for nuance or understanding.
  4. Emotional Reactions: Internet arguments often turn emotional quickly, and when people get too invested in "winning" or proving a point, the conversation shifts from a rational discussion to a battle of egos. This makes it harder to actually engage in meaningful dialogue.
  5. Time-Consuming: Many online arguments drag on without any resolution, with participants repeating their points over and over. It can quickly become a frustrating cycle where no one is listening, and no one is learning.
  6. Trolls and Bad Faith Actors: Some people engage in internet arguments not to have a real conversation, but simply to provoke others. They may twist your words, spread misinformation, or just try to get under your skin for amusement. Engaging with these individuals is often a pointless exercise.

In the end, internet arguments can drain energy, increase stress, and rarely lead to meaningful outcomes. It’s often more beneficial to step back and focus on real-world conversations where there's a chance for more depth and understanding.
For your own sake, STOP.
Thanks bro.
 
warrior 'p if he was keyed:
1743281809301v-0.png
 
Back
Top