• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

What do you think of Homosexuals?

@meijak @Cobbert Dumbass niggers, humans have been leaking over whether God is real or not for thousands of years. Do you really think the bald man forum convo between a troon and a tranimefag will result in some crazy epiphany? Progress has stalled, blue-headed hindu rhino god is valid
 
@meijak @Cobbert Dumbass niggers, humans have been leaking over whether God is real or not for thousands of years. Do you really think the bald man forum convo between a troon and a tranimefag will result in some crazy epiphany? Progress has stalled, blue-headed hindu rhino god is valid
Worked well enough to make you leak.
 
Worked well enough to make you leak.
Because it's a unique type of argument, it's the subjective of the subjective of the subjective. People have this conversation over and over and no ground is ever gained. There are no statistics you can use, nothing concrete because the foundation of religion is putting your faith into something which you don't know is truly real or not, even if you think it is.
Gaytheism is basically the same thing with a new coat of paint btw
 
Because it's a unique type of argument, it's the subjective of the subjective of the subjective. People have this conversation over and over and no ground is ever gained. There are no statistics you can use, nothing concrete because the foundation of religion is putting your faith into something which you don't know is truly real or not, even if you think it is.
Gaytheism is basically the same thing with a new coat of paint btw
atheism is a fact, theism is a belief
 
Occam's razor.
If you can't prove if something exists or not, then you don't assume it exists. You assume it doesn't exist.
Because it's a unique type of argument, it's the subjective of the subjective of the subjective. People have this conversation over and over and no ground is ever gained. There are no statistics you can use, nothing concrete because the foundation of religion is putting your faith into something which you don't know is truly real or not, even if you think it is.
Gaytheism is basically the same thing with a new coat of paint btw
I'm not claiming I know for sure God exists. But there is 0 proof, so I will not assume it, and I will not restrict my life under the assumption it's true.
atheism is a fact, theism is a belief
Not quite
 
atheism is a fact, theism is a belief
Except it's not, it's a belief based upon human knowledge. Religions are also based upon human knowledge, although in a different way. And even with LE SOYENCE at its present state, there just isn't a way for humans to understand every single little aspect of how the Universe works. I mean, fuck, the Big Bang is generally accepted... yet nobody can still agree upon what caused it. There are theories, all of them using artifacts of the past where people weren't there to observe the events themselves.
There are limits to the mind.
 
I'm not claiming I know for sure God exists. But there is 0 proof, so I will not assume it, and I will not restrict my life under the assumption it's true.
Fair enough, that's respectable. The kinds of Atheists that I absolutely despise are the ones who essentially just worship limited human knowledge, believing that everything is concrete and has already been discovered. I don't know what the fuck a photon really does.
 
Except it's not, it's a belief based upon human knowledge. Religions are also based upon human knowledge, although in a different way. And even with LE SOYENCE at its present state, there just isn't a way for humans to understand every single little aspect of how the Universe works. I mean, fuck, the Big Bang is generally accepted... yet nobody can still agree upon what caused it. There are theories, all of them using artifacts of the past where people weren't there to observe the events themselves.
There are limits to the mind.
>we can't understand what caused the big bang therefore G-d is true
kek, do theistcucks really, it's only a matter of time till science gives us an answer
 
Believing in no divine has you going through more mental gymnastics than even a Russian gymnastics coach is comfortable with.
on the contrary, the belief in the divine has you go through mental hoops, not the other way around
 
It's the easiest and most convincing argument for why we are here.

Believing in no divine has you going through more mental gymnastics than even a Russian gymnastics coach is comfortable with.
>It's the easiest and most convincing argument for why we are here.
But it's not. This isn't based on any evidence, you just assume it's true.
There are some things we simply do not know. Accept the fact that we can't answer every question.

>Believing in no divine has you going through more mental gymnastics than even a Russian gymnastics coach is comfortable with.
Such as?
 
Back
Top