• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

What do you think of Homosexuals?

Post thread
8doe said:
heres the general argument in a "nice" way for you
gay people spread STDs several times more than straight people, abuse their children more often, are more likely to be pedophiles, etc etc
Click to expand...
>gay people spread STDs several times more than straight people
And yet weirdly countries where gays are opressed like Russia have 10 times as high AIDS rates as countries where they're accepted. Almost like I already adressed this in the thread before and STDs spreading have NOTHING to do with gay people.
>abuse their children more often
The statistics are way exaggerated. The slight bump that does exist is due to the fact that gays very commonly have been abused as children themselves for being gay. If homophobia wasn't a thing then this wouldn't be a problem.
>are more likely to be pedophiles
Regular homosexuality has no overlap with pedophilic homosexuality. They are two distinct attractions. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6512871/
I also adressed this in the thread before.
 
sodack said:
I have a strong distaste for gay men but I don’t mind lesbians as long as they’re not ugly.
Click to expand...
dyke cops are the fucking worst they dont listen to anyone and they always think they're better than everybody. i had to talk to a group of police officers after some fat nigger on drugs tried to threaten and rob me and one of my friends and this fat ugly bitch wouldn't listen to me
 
Meursault said:
ah well look I've seen my fair share of ugly lesbian couples they didn't seem too bad, but fine if I had the choice i'd rather see an attractive lesbian couple.
Click to expand...
I saw this one lesbian pooner couple when I worked at a Chinese restaurant. One of them was just a regular lesbian and the other one was a short old pooner lesbian with a thin beard that was exclusively on her chin. She insisted on paying for her girlfriend’s food but didn’t have enough money and looked like she was holding back tears and then kept kissing her girlfriend constantly while waiting for their food. It was a little funny because she kept trying to act really masculine after almost crying.
 
sodack said:
I saw this one lesbian pooner couple when I worked at a Chinese restaurant. One of them was just a regular lesbian and the other one was a short old pooner lesbian with a thin beard that was exclusively on her chin. She insisted on paying for her girlfriend’s food but didn’t have enough money and looked like she was holding back tears and then kept kissing her girlfriend constantly while waiting for their food. It was a little funny because she kept trying to act really masculine after almost crying.
Click to expand...
aww that's cute. sounds like a nice couple
oh as for me? my school had a really feminine pooner never talked to her, but she seemed nice she had some pooner/troon friends too, i'm surprised she didn't get bullied.
 
Pepsilord said:
>Harm should be the basis of morality... because it just should be, ok chud?!
Extremely high IQ, I am in awe of your intelligence
Click to expand...
Well why shouldn't it be?? I'm not basing it off a fake book.
I'm not advocating for total hedonism. I value looking for knowledge or creating art that is beautiful. But none of these side values require me to declare a sexuality "evil" for no reason.
But there is no reason why you shouldn't focus on reducing suffering over anything else. The only reason you would is because you have delusional religious views.
 
Cobbert said:
>Your completely arbitrary judgment about what counts as a slave mindset has no effect on whether a certain moral claim or religion is true
Granted. But I don't need it to have an effect because christianity is a delusion. Nobody knows anything about God, heaven, sin or whether any of these things actually exist. Any religion that claims otherwise is lying.

>Muslims would like to ban pork if they had political power, though.
Yes and that is when it becomes a problem because then they force their values on others. Do you not understand that?

>Also there is no such thing as a victimless crime.
Uh yes there is? When people declare something forbidden even though lt hurts no one. That's a victimless crime.

>SOURCE!? Why should I believe that this would be wrong?
??? What the fuck do I need a source for?? No God ever told you that homosexuality is wrong. No God ever told anyone anything. Believing otherwise is simply a delusion. If God exists then he has certainly never interacted with the physical world, and especially has not ever spoken to anyone, ever. Any conclusion that you make from "words of God" are conclusions based on lies. Acting out those lies and hurting people in the process is wrong if you value not hurting people.

>You are offering absolutely no reasons why this would be the case. Why exactly should pain be the principle that should determine legality and not evil itself?
>SOURCE!? I'm going to need a source on that one. Why is there such a difference? Why should I believe that? Why should harm be the principle that determines the legality of something and not evil? Again, this is completely arbitrary. And you've offered no reason as to why someone should believe it.
Again why would I need a source for that? Of course harm should be the main principle. What do you even mean with "evil"? Your only definition seems come from an old book that you take as fact even though countless claims it has made have been factually disproven.
I would be fine with this if you only enforced your belief of "evil" on yourself. But you don't. You want to force it on others. That is what I take issue with. The difference between your faith and normal moral codes is that your faith is a delusion. And it leads you to declare things "evil" that do not hurt anyone, then hurt them in the process of trying to eliminate your delusional perception of "evil".

>You should also consider what other people believe, why they believe them, and what kind of operating system they may have as a result of those beliefs
I do consider that. I consider that there are christians who believe homosexuality is wrong, because of a 2000 year old book, and then force this belief in the form of forbidding gay men to love each other in practice. When beliefs based on delusions hurt people they are unacceptable beliefs and immoral by any regular metric.

>You should evaluate your own positions on things, and the reasons why you believe them. And also see what happens if you take them to their logical end conclusions
What would the end conclusion of my beliefs be if I may ask?

>You are not good at convincing people of anything.
I try to argue logically, not in a way that is the most convincing.
Click to expand...
pepe_disappointed.jpg

>I'm right because I presuppose that I'm right.
Great arguments. Really convincing.
 
Back
Top