• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

What do you think of Homosexuals?

You mean anal sex without contraceptives? Because if gays wear a condom that diminishes the AIDS risk to near 0. Straight people can also contract AIDS in case you didn't know. The same applies to all other STDs
It's strange how a country like Russia, which has extremely backwards LGBT laws and is famously homophobic, also has more AIDS cases than every other European country combined. Almost like gays having rights don't have anything to do with AIDS.
Homosexuals almost never wear condoms, even in highly educated countries. This is because they are sick freaks. Also the point about gay rights can be disproven by simple logic:
If gays are discouraged from pursuing sexual relationships through laws and cultural stigmas, then they are less likely to transmit HIV. If they are instead encouraged to pursue sexual relationships, then they are more likely to contract HIV.

Add to that the fact that homosexuals are far more promiscuous, engage in mass orgies and the like and simply refuse to wear condoms and now wonder they are ravaged by AIDS.

And it's not just AIDS. They literally get diseases no one's ever heard of before because, surprise surprise, you aren't supposed to stick dicks in your asshole. Also leads to anal bleeding and prolapse, but whatever
 
Same reason why a lot of drugs are banned in the United States and yet there's an opioid epidemic.
Are you retarded? It's literally because a lot of Government institutions weren't allowed to do their job. When they banned Alcohol consumption during the prohibition, that actually worked and alcohol consumption rates went down across the whole country. Banning stuff works if you actually enforce it.
 
Well, I respect people like Rock Hudson or Freddie Mercury more than I do the modern generation of fags, those guys were born into a completely different era, as flamboyant as Freddie was on stage, he kept his private life private and never disclosed his sexuality until the very end when he was dying, he would've otherwise taken it to his grave, while Rock Hudson came from the era where if you were famous in Hollywood the executives in suits would decide who you would marry and other various public decisions, it would've been an open secret if you were in that circle at that time I'm sure, but that was during a time where actors genuinely kept their private lives private, you probably wouldn't even know which political party they personally endorsed if they didn't outright say it.

Fuck Liberace though, he's a fucking weirdo.

A lot of modern fags in the United States wanna be women, act like women and are degenerate as fuck because they can be, there's no modesty or dignity behind their motivations into actions, and they manipulate and contort the truth by explaining as them "just being their real selves" instead of just simply not being a degenerate, fuck pride parades, it's full blown hedonism.
Fucking someone in the ass or getting fucked in the ass until one of your anuses prolapses and you get non-stop diarrhea isn't going to be dignified no matter how you slice it.
 
Homosexuals almost never wear condoms, even in highly educated countries. This is because they are sick freaks. Also the point about gay rights can be disproven by simple logic:
If gays are discouraged from pursuing sexual relationships through laws and cultural stigmas, then they are less likely to transmit HIV. If they are instead encouraged to pursue sexual relationships, then they are more likely to contract HIV.

Add to that the fact that homosexuals are far more promiscuous, engage in mass orgies and the like and simply refuse to wear condoms and now wonder they are ravaged by AIDS.

And it's not just AIDS. They literally get diseases no one's ever heard of before because, surprise surprise, you aren't supposed to stick dicks in your asshole. Also leads to anal bleeding and prolapse, but whatever
>Homosexuals almost never wear condoms, even in highly educated countries
Do you have any source for that?
>If gays are discouraged from pursuing sexual relationships through laws and cultural stigmas, then they are less likely to transmit HIV. If they are instead encouraged to pursue sexual relationships, then they are more likely to contract HIV.
Except it doesn't work. Just look at Russia if you want an example.
>homosexuals are far more promiscuous, engage in mass orgies and the like
Can you blame them for this? Christianity, which shuns behavior like this, has opressed homosexuals for millennia. Why would they feel the need to follow the rules of a culture that hates them?
>They literally get diseases no one's ever heard of before
AIDS started after a hunter somewhere in Africa was cut while butchering a monkey with HIV. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_HIV/AIDS#Bushmeat_practice
Also I already debunked this gay = AIDS myth in this thread.
>Also leads to anal bleeding and prolapse
Way exaggerated issue, non-existent if you practice safe sex. Even if it was I don't see why this should mean gays are evil since this doesn't affect anyone else.
 
1739567056101.png

>Just let gay people do they thing okay?
 
Are you retarded? It's literally because a lot of Government institutions weren't allowed to do their job. When they banned Alcohol consumption during the prohibition, that actually worked and alcohol consumption rates went down across the whole country. Banning stuff works if you actually enforce it.
You still had people importing alcohol during the prohibition, most famous of which being Joseph P. Kennedy Sr, and I'm sure there were select locations that still sold beer illegally.. at least until they didn't.

Fucking someone in the ass or getting fucked in the ass until one of your anuses prolapses and you get non-stop diarrhea isn't going to be dignified no matter how you slice it.
I agree to an extent, but as long as they keep it in the bedroom and don't show off their nads to everyone at a hedonism parade and force their degeneracy on everyone else, I couldn't care less if they die from internal bleeding as a result of anal sex gone wrong in their apartments.
 
Are you retarded? It's literally because a lot of Government institutions weren't allowed to do their job. When they banned Alcohol consumption during the prohibition, that actually worked and alcohol consumption rates went down across the whole country. Banning stuff works if you actually enforce it.
Nigga? Prohibition is famous for not working as intended. It lead to people drinking far stronger liquor than they usually would, and since it was illegal anyways any health regulations were ignored too (Just think of how many people went blind thanks to Moonshine). Also directly lead to the creation of massive crime rings that took decades to clean up after prohibition finally ended.

View attachment 147284
>Just let gay people do they thing okay?
Homophobic laws and culture don't decrease STD rates. Sorry but that's just how it is.
 
>Homosexuals almost never wear condoms, even in highly educated countries
Do you have any source for that?
>If gays are discouraged from pursuing sexual relationships through laws and cultural stigmas, then they are less likely to transmit HIV. If they are instead encouraged to pursue sexual relationships, then they are more likely to contract HIV.
Except it doesn't work. Just look at Russia if you want an example.
>homosexuals are far more promiscuous, engage in mass orgies and the like
Can you blame them for this? Christianity, which shuns behavior like this, has opressed homosexuals for millennia. Why would they feel the need to follow the rules of a culture that hates them?
>They literally get diseases no one's ever heard of before
AIDS started after a hunter somewhere in Africa was cut while butchering a monkey with HIV. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_HIV/AIDS#Bushmeat_practice
Also I already debunked this gay = AIDS myth in this thread.
>Also leads to anal bleeding and prolapse
Way exaggerated issue, non-existent if you practice safe sex. Even if it was I don't see why this should mean gays are evil since this doesn't affect anyone else.
Vile.
 
I agree to an extent, but as long as they keep it in the bedroom and don't show off their nads to everyone at a hedonism parade and force their degeneracy on everyone else, I couldn't care less if they die from internal bleeding as a result of anal sex gone wrong in their apartments.
Obviously, nothing can be done to you if you keep it secret, but it must be punished if it is found out.

In other words: get back in the closet
Nigga? Prohibition is famous for not working as intended. It lead to people drinking far stronger liquor than they usually would, and since it was illegal anyways any health regulations were ignored too (Just think of how many people went blind thanks to Moonshine). Also directly lead to the creation of massive crime rings that took decades to clean up after prohibition finally ended.
Just read the Wikipedia page. Alcohol consumption declined during it, but rose again after it was lifted. Liver cirrhosis, alcoholic psychosis and infant mortality rates all dropped significantly during the prohibition. So yes, it did in fact work.
Way exaggerated issue, non-existent if you practice safe sex. Even if it was I don't see why this should mean gays are evil since this doesn't affect anyone else.
It is evil to let people willingly hurt themselves.
Can you blame them for this? Christianity, which shuns behavior like this, has opressed homosexuals for millennia. Why would they feel the need to follow the rules of a culture that hates them?
We no longer live in a Christian society, so they should have no reason to act like this.
Except it doesn't work. Just look at Russia if you want an example.
Except it does work, just look at China as an example.
AIDS started after a hunter somewhere in Africa was cut while butchering a monkey with HIV.
I wasn't talking about AIDS in this case. Contact with human feces can give you infections of bacteria and viruses we don’t even know of.

Guess what’s found in the Anus?
 
>Intstitutionalized any dissent towards homosexuality being accepted and idolized as a phobia (mental illness)
>Anyone who doesn't agree with me is mentally ill, scientists say
>biggest well poisoning in the culture war award
Phobia doesn't mean mental illness? It just means aversion, or fear rather. Which is absolutely a common trait people who hate gays have. They fear homosexuals internally.

Obviously, nothing can be done to you if you keep it secret, but it must be punished if it is found out.

In other words: get back in the closet

Just read the Wikipedia page. Alcohol consumption declined during it, but rose again after it was lifted. Liver cirrhosis, alcoholic psychosis and infant mortality rates all dropped significantly during the prohibition. So yes, it did in fact work.

It is evil to let people willingly hurt themselves.

We no longer live in a Christian society, so they should have no reason to act like this.

Except it does work, just look at China as an example.

I wasn't talking about AIDS in this case. Contact with human feces can give you infections of bacteria and viruses we don’t even know of.

Guess what’s found in the Anus?
>Just read the Wikipedia page. Alcohol consumption declined during it, but rose again after it was lifted. Liver cirrhosis, alcoholic psychosis and infant mortality rates all dropped significantly during the prohibition. So yes, it did in fact work.
The opinion of scholars whether this really was worth it at the end is mixed. In my opinion, this isn't worth the trade-off that organized crime brings with it.
>It is evil to let people willingly hurt themselves.
Then teach them safe sex. It's not hard to avoid a prolapse.
"But why not just ban homos then-"
Just teach them safe sex.
>We no longer live in a Christian society, so they should have no reason to act like this.
But we do? Our culture is still deeply entrenched in Christian values even if organized christianity is dying. You are still judged for acting promiscous, exhibit A being you.
>Except it does work, just look at China as an example.
Wait so you're just ignoring Russia then? You can't even explain it? What is the difference between Russia and China that makes one country have AIDS and the other not? Russia is still more homophobic than China if I had to wager. So clearly your argument of "da gays caused it" falls flat. Explain this to me nigger.
>I wasn't talking about AIDS in this case. Contact with human feces can give you infections of bacteria and viruses we don’t even know of.
It's called wearing a condom.
 
Can you blame them for this? Christianity, which shuns behavior like this, has opressed homosexuals for millennia. Why would they feel the need to follow the rules of a culture that hates them?
Modern Christianity is built on phonies, televangelists and metaphorical skinwalkers, they wear a suit that does not belong to them, they don't even follow their own rules.
 
But we do? Our culture is still deeply entrenched in Christian values even if organized christianity is dying. You are still judged for acting promiscous, exhibit A being you.
(1. First half is true, which is only enhances the phoniness of modern Christianity's followers, and people who indirectly spit out rhetoric they don't know the origin of, even if say that rhetoric actually came from a snca Televanglist.

(2. Promiscuity is only shamed in certain circles nowadays, conservatism and traditionalism in reality have been dead for a long time and replaced with neo-Republicianism and MAGA, a lot of people have tattoos now, piercings among other degenerate accessories that would not be considered "Christian", a lot of women have Onlyfans now, it's not a heaping concern as the days go by as it would've been say a decade or two ago.
 
I say we should treat them like alcoholics, all we can do is lay out the facts to them that this lifestyle is dangerous and offer help.
At the end of the day it's ultimately up to them to decide.
HIV will do the killing for us as liver failure does for alcoholics.
Trying to save people from themselves never works, it just guarantees they will never work with you.
 
The opinion of scholars whether this really was worth it at the end is mixed. In my opinion, this isn't worth the trade-off that organized crime brings with it.
You can say this because Alcohol is a relatively tame drug and allowing it doesn’t cause too many problems because most people will self regulate, but drugs like meth, crack, heroine and fentanyl are so dangerous and so addicting that relying on the self regulation of the people is not an option.
Then teach them safe sex. It's not hard to avoid a prolapse.
"But why not just ban homos then-"
Just teach them safe sex.
We tried that, they don’t care. If they can't play safe (ugh) then they can't play at all.
But we do? Our culture is still deeply entrenched in Christian values even if organized christianity is dying. You are still judged for acting promiscous, exhibit A being you.
People like me are such a minority it’s not even funny anymore. The few Christian morals we still have are being watered down and ground away at as we speak.
Wait so you're just ignoring Russia then? You can't even explain it? What is the difference between Russia and China that makes one country have AIDS and the other not? Russia is still more homophobic than China if I had to wager. So clearly your argument of "da gays caused it" falls flat. Explain this to me nigger.
The high HIV rates are probably aftershocks of the collapse of the Soviet Union. You can see the same trend with alcohol consumption. It spiked during and after the fall of the USSR
It's called wearing a condom.
Again, they don’t do that.
 
Back
Top