Serious How do we grow the userbase

[Retarded_FAG]

what if someone bought a YouTube ad for the soyjak blog?

maybe with a gemmy video

I think account registrations would need to be re enabled

 

[USL]

There is zero rulecucking here, this is the most laid back site ever. One of the problems is there isn't enough rulecucking. I mean that whole drama thread with x and cob wouldn't have even happened if Mud just shut it down with his literal moderation permissions, instead of doing nothing and then freaking out after it happened.

I do think quality moderation here has been so and so for the past few months, however like @Steve said, they are working on shit like metadrama so I cannot talk shit on them tooooo hard for the time being.

 

[Watt]

I do think quality moderation here has been so and so for the past few months, however like @Steve said, they are working on shit like metadrama so I cannot talk shit on them tooooo hard for the time being.

It's not like it's bad moderation to say the least, but there needs to be some action on the janny's behalf. I mean to be fair though, metadrama is hard to counter, and can grow out of control before you even know what's going on.

 

[basil]

There is zero rulecucking here, this is the most laid back site ever. One of the problems is there isn't enough rulecucking. I mean that whole drama thread with x and cob wouldn't have even happened if Mud just shut it down with his literal moderation permissions, instead of doing nothing and then freaking out after it happened.

i get rulecucked alot actually

 

[meijak]

There is zero rulecucking here, this is the most laid back site ever. One of the problems is there isn't enough rulecucking. I mean that whole drama thread with x and cob wouldn't have even happened if Mud just shut it down with his literal moderation permissions, instead of doing nothing and then freaking out after it happened.

I mean you're coming back to X and cobson, I don't think anyone disagrees that they should've been 'nished. I think generally more transparency would be welcome, bring back the ban list. Also, if the rules were actually applied equally, 99% of us here would be banned.

 

[basil]

i get rulecucked alot actually

no but actually i feel like im the most punished user on this website

 

[Watt]

I mean you're coming back to X and cobson, I don't think anyone disagrees that they should've been 'nished. I think generally more transparency would be welcome, bring back the ban list. Also, if the rules were actually applied equally, 99% of us here would be banned.

Transparency would be good, and the ban list was nice to have, but I don't know if that rules thing is true.

 

[USL]

It's not like it's bad moderation

Right, but whether the moderation is bad or the rules they are enforcing are bad, the end result is about the same. I wouldn't worry about hurting the jannies feelings, they get what we are saying. Although since you bring it up, I can think of a few cases of "bad moderation."

 

[meijak]

Transparency would be good, and the ban list was nice to have, but I don't know if that rules thing is true.

>4. Threads WILL adhere to the general topic of the board; they will be moved or deleted otherwise.
>Derailing does happen, but DO NOT intentionally derail threads with SNCA off site drama or other disruptive content.
You could ban everyone who has ever called, for example, jimbo a faggot o algo under this and technically be in the right.

 

[basil]

Right, but whether the moderation is bad or the rules they are moderating are bad, the end result is about the same. I wouldn't worry about hurting the jannies feelings, they get what we are saying. Although since you bring it up, I can think of a few cases of "bad moderation."
View attachment 137874

this has never happened to me because if it did; first of all, broot is pirating xenforo, second of all, i would alert the u.s government about the illegal materials on this website.

 

[Username:Required]

There is zero rulecucking here

>no rulecucking even doe you get banned for or punished for @ing door or having an edit of a image from a newspaper on your banner

 

[Steve]

>4. Threads WILL adhere to the general topic of the board; they will be moved or deleted otherwise.
>Derailing does happen, but DO NOT intentionally derail threads with SNCA off site drama or other disruptive content.
You could ban everyone who has ever called, for example, jimbo a faggot o algo under this and technically be in the right.

funnily enough the only time this role has ever been enforced was against jimbo

Also

 

[USL]

this has never happened to me because...

You are a pro establishment libtard, while I am an objectively correct free thinker.

 

[Watt]

>4. Threads WILL adhere to the general topic of the board; they will be moved or deleted otherwise.
>Derailing does happen, but DO NOT intentionally derail threads with SNCA off site drama or other disruptive content.
You could ban everyone who has ever called, for example, jimbo a faggot o algo under this and technically be in the right.

well I guess that's if you take them as literal hard rules or just guidelines and warnings. There is a diffrence between having a strict jannies, and then 1984 rulecucked bonkers brigade.

 

[Watt]

>no rulecucking even doe you get banned for or punished for @ing door or having an edit of a image from a newspaper on your banner

Banning someone for having a literal dead infant with it's head cut off as your banner is not rulecucking.

 

[meijak]

funnily enough the only time this role has ever been enforced was against jimbo

Also
View attachment 137875

It doesn't change the fact that it's a shit rule, because it can be applied so broadly.

 

[Watt]

It doesn't change the fact that it's a shit rule, because it can be applied so broadly.

Well it does say intentionally derail, but I guess it should be updated to "repeated attempts at derailment are prohibited" or something along those lines

 

[Username:Required]

Banning someone for having a literal dead infant with it's head cut off as your banner is not rulecucking.

The image was completely SFW you could spam it on the sharty which is filled with Jannies that leak over dead niggers especially DNB and they won’t ban you because that image was not gore.
Also you’re forgetting the fact that if you piss off doll he severely punishes you. See how redditor got permad for talking with someone door has a clitty leakage over.

 

[Steve]

It doesn't change the fact that it's a shit rule, because it can be applied so broadly.

You assume we're all spineless and are gonna grasp at straws to ban people the staff doesn't like, its long established that every rule except 2 is somewhat lenient.

 

[USL]

Speaking of derailment, I think site rules are only a small factor in increasing the userbase. 4cvck isn't the most popular imageboard because of its rules, it's the most popular imageboard because it has the most people. Having people and active threads are what keep people here, so the biggest hurdle is getting them to come here. recruiting from the soysphere is no longer an option. We've taken everyone to be had from the soysphere and the NewGods these days are low quality. We could go the kiwifarms route and make a SNCA stream promoting it.