- Joined
- Apr 26, 2024
- Messages
- 3,687
You don't need a licence for them btwcap and ball revolvers are my favorite kind of revolvers despite the fact they take like 10 minutes to reload
You don't need a licence for them btwcap and ball revolvers are my favorite kind of revolvers despite the fact they take like 10 minutes to reload
looks sickArmstrong gun
I mean swords were a good option since muskets took 50 years to load
thats what I like about them also because they look coolYou don't need a licence for them btw
never knew this existed, but it's cool as shit:cap and ball revolvers are my favorite kind of revolvers despite the fact they take like 10 minutes to reload
if someone is using a match lock maybeI mean swords were a good option since muskets took 50 yers to load
reminds me of the nock gun
even the early revolvers took a lot to reloadif someone is using a match lock maybe
wasnt this also used to kill africansMartini-Henry rifle
last I checked muskets also doubled as spears because they had bayonets, ergo you're bringing a sword to a gun-pike hybrid fightI mean swords were a good option since muskets took 50 years to load
evendoe cavalrylast I checked muskets also doubled as spears because they had bayonets, ergo you're bringing a sword to a gun-pike hybrid fight
bayonets were also used to replace pikemeneven the early revolvers took a lot to reload
Of course a loaded gun can take a sword but an unloaded one can't do anything
That is why they added bayonets to the gun back in 1800's
oh yeah pikemen were used to like push calvary away which is why soldiers were in those line formations because no cavalryman wants to get impaled at the end of a bayonetevendoe cavalry
Even against a bolt action, if you were to, say, jump into a trench and land right in front of someone, the man with the sword wins and the man with the gun never gets a chance to even aim in such a tight space.I mean swords were a good option since muskets took 50 years to load
its still interesting that most people carried a sabre in the 1800's warsoh yeah pikemen were used to like push calvary away which is why soldiers were in those line formations because no cavalryman wants to get impaled at the end of a bayonet
no. i believe this was the opposite, this was used in the british expedition into ethiopia and the first italian-ethiopian war, by the ethiopians.wasnt this used to like kill niggas in africa
Trench maces worked well too I doubt many people held swords but they had maces to bash the head in of the enemyEven against a bolt action, if you were to, say, jump into a trench and land right in front of someone, the man with the sword wins and the man with the gun never gets a chance to even aim in such a tight space.
It's easier to pull one hand back to make room for a thrust, or raise it to slash downward, than it is to move your rifle back to make room to fire at the enemy. If you do get the chance to shoot (from the hip, in this case, is the only option) you'd better make a killshot, or you're going to get hacked to shit by a rabid animal of a man before you can even touch the bolt.
Muskets are like canons. Really helpful, right up until someone reaches you
its a 1883 gatling gun doeno. i believe this was the opposite, this was used in the british expedition into ethiopia and the first italian-ethiopian war, by the ethiopians.
named after a ukrainian city, it was the first piece of advanced weaponry made by an independent african nation, it took 6 years to make, and i believe was made in the 1850s.
Have one of those (reproduction) and the prolonged reloading process would be forgivable but it's just not reliable, probably will fire 50% of the time.cap and ball revolvers are my favorite kind of revolvers despite the fact they take like 10 minutes to reload