>Arrow Gamergate o algo

For greentexts, soyquotes copypastas and lyrics
Gamergate didn't start like this. There was a scandal about some literal who game journo fucking a literal who game dev. But not even a few months later it has already been turned into a leakage campaign against anything 4cucks deemed too SJW. The article you mentioned was written after a lot of gamergaters already commited harassment against journos. Revisionist liars are now saying it was unprompted and somehow Gamergate started there.
There's a reason moot sent these niggers to 8chan, nobody cared about videogames, most of them just wanted to be keyboard activists.
Watch the first 13 minutes, I found this guy to be relatively unbiased.
 
Gamergate didn't start like this. There was a scandal about some literal who game journo fucking a literal who game dev. But not even a few months later it has already been turned into a leakage campaign against anything 4cucks deemed too SJW. The article you mentioned was written after a lot of gamergaters already commited harassment against journos. Revisionist liars are now saying it was unprompted and somehow Gamergate started there.
There's a reason moot sent these niggers to 8chan, nobody cared about videogames, most of them just wanted to be keyboard activists.
Watch the first 13 minutes, I found this guy to be relatively unbiased.
what if instead of sweetbaby inc it was tarbaby inc and instead of making shitty gay video games they ate watermelon and drank hennessy
 
Last edited:
One interesting thing about the Wikipedia page for GamerGate is that Wikipedia's rules for source inclusion perfectly fit what journalists need to push their agenda. The rules for sources is that primary sources aren't really allowed because they "rely too much on original research" but secondary sources are good as long as they come from a respectable news outlet. Because GamerGate was criticizing video game journalists, the journalists in their ivory towers started crying because they had faced accountability for their actions, so they wrote their critics in the most negative light possible while avoiding anything negative about them (like the chat leaks, those aren't mentioned on Wikipedia because none of the journalists could stand to confront the truth.) Any website that was willing to challenge the narrative was labeled as an unreliable news source and blacklisted from Wikipedia.
 
Back
Top