• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

Christianity is non-Aryan in origin.

Congrats you are ashkenazi jew
I’m not ethnically nor religiously Jewish.
The Israelites definitely did not respect the foreigners religion.
They did, a little too much because they often fell into temptation of worshiping the pagan gods because they were surrounded by pagan nations.
from the point of view of a Jew it is ostensibly untrue, and furthermore they have a quite different view of the Messiah, so the Jew is still biblically grounded in his Loxism.
Well you aren’t Jewish so I don’t really understand how you can speak on behalf of what all Jews believe. There’s many different sects of Judaism, and while a good amount of them do not proclaim that Jesus is the messiah, they do respect differing ideas and won’t look down upon someone who is different than them. I believe that the New Testament does not cancel out Judaism and someone who is ethnically Jewish can still retain his nationhood and ritual customs of eating and purification while also holding that Jesus is the messiah, it’s entirely possible and the hatred is only being spearheaded by fringe extremists on both sides of the equation.

So to conclude, I do not think Christian and Jewish doctrine have any reason to contradict or despise each other, nor do I think one side as a whole looks down on the other side and seeks to identify destroy it.

btw guess who mView attachment 121718ade the term aryan and what it means
respect ur superiors lil bro
The “aryans” you’re referring to are the indo-European nomads who’s language spread and broke into different languages as they slowly migrated across Eurasia. It’s more a language thing than a race thing, and furthermore Iran is pretty ethnically diverse. Just admit you lost the debate.
 
The “aryans” you’re referring to are the indo-European nomads who’s language spread and broke into different languages as they slowly migrated across Eurasia. It’s more a language thing than a race thing, and furthermore Iran is pretty ethnically diverse. Just admit you lost the debate.
You clearly have 0 knowledge on this topic
It's both a language thing AND a race thing. "Aryan" is literally just an evolution of the Yamnayan word for their own people, Hwerios. They did indeed migrate across Eurasia and also SETTLED in those parts of Europe and Asia, intermixing with the native population. The proof exists within human genetics. The haplogroup R1 a and b are the related paternal genome that comes from the Indo-europeans, and you can see clearly how that is spread across Eurasia in picrel.
1000006305.png

Pink part is R1a, common in eastern Europe and and Asian Aryans, and red is R1b, common in western Europe. The part of European DNA which does not belong to Indo-Europeans is the I haplogroup, which comes from the Caucasus, it's why we call whites Caucasian despite them not being caucasian. Long before the Indo-Europeans existed, these Caucasian Hunter Gatherers split off, traveling northwest, to Europe, southwest to the Arab lands (South middle east), and the ones who remained later populated the north of the middle east, Iran, turkey, and the Caucasian republics in Russia such as chechnya and ossetia.

That is why despite having no Indo-European DNA, Arabs are the closest race to whites outside of the Aryan world. To put it simply, Iranians will be on average 30% Indo European DNA, 55% Caucasian, 10% EEF (hard to explain, haplogroup G) and 5% other (trace amounts North African, Turkic, Indian etc.)

And while there are many different cultures in Iran, most, around 80% of them are ethnically similar, with only Balochis in the southeast and Azeris in the northwest being somewhat different
 
You clearly have 0 knowledge on this topic
It's both a language thing AND a race thing. "Aryan" is literally just an evolution of the Yamnayan word for their own people, Hwerios. They did indeed migrate across Eurasia and also SETTLED in those parts of Europe and Asia, intermixing with the native population. The proof exists within human genetics. The haplogroup R1 a and b are the related paternal genome that comes from the Indo-europeans, and you can see clearly how that is spread across Eurasia in picrel.
View attachment 121808
Pink part is R1a, common in eastern Europe and and Asian Aryans, and red is R1b, common in western Europe. The part of European DNA which does not belong to Indo-Europeans is the I haplogroup, which comes from the Caucasus, it's why we call whites Caucasian despite them not being caucasian. Long before the Indo-Europeans existed, these Caucasian Hunter Gatherers split off, traveling northwest, to Europe, southwest to the Arab lands (South middle east), and the ones who remained later populated the north of the middle east, Iran, turkey, and the Caucasian republics in Russia such as chechnya and ossetia.

That is why despite having no Indo-European DNA, Arabs are the closest race to whites outside of the Aryan world. To put it simply, Iranians will be on average 30% Indo European DNA, 55% Caucasian, 10% EEF (hard to explain, haplogroup G) and 5% other (trace amounts North African, Turkic, Indian etc.)

And while there are many different cultures in Iran, most, around 80% of them are ethnically similar, with only Balochis in the southeast and Azeris in the northwest being somewhat different
Sounds like outdated fairy tales to me.
 
You clearly have 0 knowledge on this topic
It's both a language thing AND a race thing. "Aryan" is literally just an evolution of the Yamnayan word for their own people, Hwerios. They did indeed migrate across Eurasia and also SETTLED in those parts of Europe and Asia, intermixing with the native population. The proof exists within human genetics. The haplogroup R1 a and b are the related paternal genome that comes from the Indo-europeans, and you can see clearly how that is spread across Eurasia in picrel.
View attachment 121808
Pink part is R1a, common in eastern Europe and and Asian Aryans, and red is R1b, common in western Europe. The part of European DNA which does not belong to Indo-Europeans is the I haplogroup, which comes from the Caucasus, it's why we call whites Caucasian despite them not being caucasian. Long before the Indo-Europeans existed, these Caucasian Hunter Gatherers split off, traveling northwest, to Europe, southwest to the Arab lands (South middle east), and the ones who remained later populated the north of the middle east, Iran, turkey, and the Caucasian republics in Russia such as chechnya and ossetia.

That is why despite having no Indo-European DNA, Arabs are the closest race to whites outside of the Aryan world. To put it simply, Iranians will be on average 30% Indo European DNA, 55% Caucasian, 10% EEF (hard to explain, haplogroup G) and 5% other (trace amounts North African, Turkic, Indian etc.)

And while there are many different cultures in Iran, most, around 80% of them are ethnically similar, with only Balochis in the southeast and Azeris in the northwest being somewhat different
Zzz...
 
Sidenote: Turks from Azerbaijan and turkey, although sharing the same Caucasian subdivision of DNA, are significantly different because they are heavily mixed with Turkic people who come from central Asia.

If you're wondering, the European Caucasians split is haplo I, Arab one is J1 and North middle east one is J2. I is significantly closer to j2 but they are all pretty close.
EEF is a bit complex so you can look it up if you care
 
Sidenote: Turks from Azerbaijan and turkey, although sharing the same Caucasian subdivision of DNA, are significantly different because they are heavily mixed with Turkic people who come from central Asia.

If you're wondering, the European Caucasians split is haplo I, Arab one is J1 and North middle east one is J2. I is significantly closer to j2 but they are all pretty close.
EEF is a bit complex so you can look it up if you care
It's heckin science
Yeah the thing about all this is that it’s fairy tales. It’s made up. This is the kind of stuff your mother reads to you at night and then kisses your forehead, it’s little kid fairy tales.
 
They did, a little too much because they often fell into temptation of worshiping the pagan gods because they were surrounded by pagan nations.
Over the course of centuries sometimes they fell into habits, but that does not negate the zealous periods
Well you aren’t Jewish so I don’t really understand how you can speak on behalf of what all Jews believe. There’s many different sects of Judaism, and while a good amount of them do not proclaim that Jesus is the messiah, they do respect differing ideas and won’t look down upon someone who is different than them. I believe that the New Testament does not cancel out Judaism and someone who is ethnically Jewish can still retain his nationhood and ritual customs of eating and purification while also holding that Jesus is the messiah, it’s entirely possible and the hatred is only being spearheaded by fringe extremists on both sides of the equation.
It's hard to be too anti-Jesus when you live surrounded by Christians, but historically when they lived in shtetls and their own segregated city quarters they held some downright retarded superstitions about Jesus like that on Christmas he would escape from hell and haunt the toilets of the Jews
So to conclude, I do not think Christian and Jewish doctrine have any reason to contradict or despise each other, nor do I think one side as a whole looks down on the other side and seeks to identify destroy it.
The two main contradictions are A) No Jews (even pretty much no Messianic Jews) believe in the trinity, B) Jews generally do not believe Jesus was the messiah or the son of God, and traditionally believed he was just one of many heretics and false messiahs
The “aryans” you’re referring to are the indo-European nomads who’s language spread and broke into different languages as they slowly migrated across Eurasia. It’s more a language thing than a race thing, and furthermore Iran is pretty ethnically diverse. Just admit you lost the debate.
The "Aryan Race" refers to the descendants of the Indo-Europeans who have a significant amount of blood from the Aryans.
 
Back
Top