VOTE! Are slopjaks gemmy?

Are slopjaks gemmy?

  • Yes.

  • No.

  • Let XXX_SKIBIDISIGMA_XXX decide.


Results are only viewable after voting.

XXX_SKIBIDISIGMA_XXX

My style is ridiculous!
ΣΚΙΒΙΔΙ ΔΟΜ ΔΟΜ ΔΟΜ ΨΕΣ ΨΕΣ
🏅
Joined
Apr 22, 2024
Messages
11,159
>Ya kuchh aur.
1000001989.png
 
Created by a pedo, Somewhat continues the trend of strange subvariants like Deformed jaks and Babyjaks
 
Created by a pedo, Somewhat continues the trend of strange subvariants like Deformed jaks and Babyjaks
Joel claims to be the creator of slopjaks, but he never created the jartycuck or the FNF pedo, just the brown troonjak, it's expected since he's an attentionwhore.
 
@265121297 why? Also gemmy username.
I think soyjaks are funny because they're an accurate representation of a group of people that actually exists. There are people who feel offended by soyjaks because they look like that and they say that. Meanwhile, no one looks like a slopjak, meanig that they aren't offensive and therefore not funny.
 
Meanwhile, no one looks like a slopjak, meanig that they aren't offensive and therefore not funny.
I think you should start thinking outside the box, slopjaks are gemmy not becuase of who they are trying to represent but becuase of their absurdity, they are nonsense gems like babyjaks.
 
I think you should start thinking outside the box, slopjaks are gemmy not becuase of who they are trying to represent but becuase of their absurdity, they are nonsense gems like babyjaks.
Babyjaks aren't gemmy since they're only used for self inserting. Slopjaks are worse doe, since they don't really represent anything. It's like depicting someone as an eldritch horror.
 
Babyjaks aren't gemmy since they're only used for self inserting. Slopjaks are worse doe, since they don't really represent anything. It's like depicting someone as an eldritch horror.
babyjaks wabag kys
95159 - SoyBooru.png
 
Back
Top