Shit EVERYBODY Cares About! Total Muslim Death

[Alextremo2TheMax]

>So here's the thing Terry, you're a low testosterone homosexual who blurts out his fantasy nonsense 24/7.

 

[Warrior-Z]

Still no argument to why you should arbitrarily claim they're BOTH independently wrong with the same information, just claiming that it's lies with no argument

The argument is within the doc lmao, and it's not arbitary, that's a presupposition. Look, since you're gonna try to RAT and not even read the doc I'm just gonna flame you with the argument directly.

1. The well-known historian Ibn Jareer al-Tabari writes at page 50 of volume 4 of his 'Book of History': "Abu Bakr married two ladies in the days of ignorance. Fateelah daughter of Abd al-Aza was the first, from whom Abdullah and Asma were born. Umm-i-Rooman was the second, from whom Abd al-Rahman and Aisha were born. All the four children of Abu Bakr were born in the days of ignorance from the above-named two ladies.
2. It is a well-known fact of history, that Abu Bakr’s son Abd al-Rahman fought against the Muslims in the battle of Badr. His age at that time was 21-22 years, and although he was older than Aisha, there is no evidence to show that the difference between their ages was more than three or four years. This fact lends support to the view that Aisha was born four or five years before the Call.
3. Now we know that Aisha was engaged by prophet Muhammad (p) in around 11th year of call (i.e.around 620 ad ) and consummated by marriage after three years i.e., around 623-624 a.d.. Now do the calculation the calculation . In 623 when Aisha’s brother was 21-22 , at that time Aisha (r) was not less than 18-19 years .
4. Hence when Prophet Muhammad (p) engaged her in 620 ad she was around 16-17 years . Almost after 2-3 years Prophet (p) married her and took her to his home , which tends her age finally around 19
   So, again, any refutation?

 

[Warrior-Z]

Meds I'm high T and asexual

You're not high T and you just admitted you're some LBBQ member.

 

[terrycrews]

You're not high T and you just admitted you're some LBBQ member.

How would you know my T levels

 

[Warrior-Z]

How would you know my T levels

By the way you walk and talk.

 

[terrycrews]

By the way you walk and talk.

Meds I don't walk or talk on here I only type

 

[Alextremo2TheMax]

The argument is within the doc lmao, and it's not arbitary, that's a presupposition. Look, since you're gonna try to RAT and not even read the doc I'm just gonna flame you with the argument directly.

1. The well-known historian Ibn Jareer al-Tabari writes at page 50 of volume 4 of his 'Book of History': "Abu Bakr married two ladies in the days of ignorance. Fateelah daughter of Abd al-Aza was the first, from whom Abdullah and Asma were born. Umm-i-Rooman was the second, from whom Abd al-Rahman and Aisha were born. All the four children of Abu Bakr were born in the days of ignorance from the above-named two ladies.
2. It is a well-known fact of history, that Abu Bakr’s son Abd al-Rahman fought against the Muslims in the battle of Badr. His age at that time was 21-22 years, and although he was older than Aisha, there is no evidence to show that the difference between their ages was more than three or four years. This fact lends support to the view that Aisha was born four or five years before the Call.
3. Now we know that Aisha was engaged by prophet Muhammad (p) in around 11th year of call (i.e.around 620 ad ) and consummated by marriage after three years i.e., around 623-624 a.d.. Now do the calculation the calculation . In 623 when Aisha’s brother was 21-22 , at that time Aisha (r) was not less than 18-19 years .
4. Hence when Prophet Muhammad (p) engaged her in 620 ad she was around 16-17 years . Almost after 2-3 years Prophet (p) married her and took her to his home , which tends her age finally around 19
   So, again, any refutation?

The refutation is that you're relying on baptist bible maths to disprove two direct accounts that say the same thing
If this was OBVIOUSLY the case then 99% muzzies wouldn't actively believe it unless you think that all muslims are functionally retarded in which case your religion is complete worthless shit, Pick one

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

idc about who u believe in, just don't push it at my face

 

[terrycrews]

idc about who u believe in, just don't push it at my face

Let's become Mormons

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

Let's become Mormons

okay

 

[ukrainian_chad]

alextremo2themax is having a leakdown

 

[terrycrews]

Anyway my dick is 9 inches long and it mogs Warrior-She

 

[Xiuhcoyotl]

Anyway my dick is 9 inches long and it mogs Warrior-She

i thought u two were buddies..

 

[terrycrews]

i thought u two were buddies..

I actually like him I think he's super funny

 

[Warrior-Z]

The refutation is that you're relying on baptist bible maths to disprove two direct accounts that say the same thing
If this was OBVIOUSLY the then 99% muzzies wouldn't actively believe it unless you think that all muslims are functionally retarded in which case your religion is complete worthless shit, Pick one

Your argument is based MORE on fallacies than evidence. Saying, "99% of Muslims believe it" is argumentum ad populum due to the fact that truth is not determined by consensus, REETARD, but by evidence. Blurting out that the historical calculations of Ibn Jareer al-Tabari "Baptist Bible maths" is a straw man because they are based on Islamic historiography, not external theology, dumbass. Also you committed a false dilemma. Islamic scholarship actually flourishes with rather diverse intellectual perspectives and capacity to reevaluate evidence. The age assigned for Aisha at marriage in this particular timeline, based on her brother's age, raises her possible marriage age to something like 18-19, really meant to be given serious consideration, not rhetorical dismissal. If you are going to respond emotionally, why not allude to the evidence instead? Your counter to the claim weakens each time it is exposed to logical scrutiny.
GET BTFO'D HAHAHAHAHA

 

[terrycrews]

Your argument is based MORE on fallacies than evidence. Saying, "99% of Muslims believe it" is argumentum ad populum due to the fact that truth is not determined by consensus, REETARD, but by evidence. Blurting out that the historical calculations of Ibn Jareer al-Tabari "Baptist Bible maths" is a straw man--because they are based on Islamic historiography, not external theology, dumbass. Also you committed a false dilemma. Islamic scholarship actually flourishes with rather diverse intellectual perspectives and capacity to reevaluate evidence. The age assigned for Aisha at marriage in this particular timeline, based on her brother's age, raises her possible marriage age to something like 18-19, really meant to be given serious consideration, not rhetorical dismissal. If you are going to respond emotionally, why not allude to the evidence instead? Your counter to the claim weakens each time it is exposed to logical scrutiny.
GET BTFO'D HAHAHAHAHA

Anyone who has sex with someone under 25 is a pedophile

 

[Warrior-Z]

Anyway my dick is 0.9 inches long

That's sad bro.

 

[Warrior-Z]

alextremo2themax is having a leakdown

He loses all debates.

 

[Warrior-Z]

Meds I don't walk or talk on here I only type

You do that everyday.

 

[terrycrews]

That's sad bro.

Editing my quote fallacy