- Joined
- Jun 13, 2024
- Messages
- 8,690
mathematics isn't a science it's a natural law.Does this include mathematics as a "fake" science like the rest of them? I hate math.
mathematics isn't a science it's a natural law.Does this include mathematics as a "fake" science like the rest of them? I hate math.
You're a soyboy.Physoestrogens do not increase estrogen levels in men.
>IS DA JOOZYou're a soyboy.
Go trust your fucking jew-funded sciences!![]()
>The field of evolutionary biology would keep existing if evolution was disproven because… IT JUST WOULD OK!?Scientists don't make careers based on proving evolution. They make careers based on conducting studies that prove/disprove certain aspects of it. In fact, hundreds of years ago evolution would actually ruin your career if you brought it up. Darwin wasn't the first to come up with the theory.
Well no, it wouldn't. But this is a retarded hypothetical because evolution very clearly exists. It's like saying physicists made up atom theory.>The field of evolutionary biology would keep existing if evolution was disproven because… IT JUST WOULD OK!?
Evolution is buuuuuullshit.Well no, it wouldn't. But this is a retarded hypothetical because evolution very clearly exists. It's like saying physicists made up atom theory.
There is a difference between corporate sponsored studies and independent ones. Independent studies don't work with a predetermined conclusion which is a core aspect of true science. You can check if a study is independent by looking at its main contributors.
Nice try, Shlomo Shekelstein!There is a difference between corporate sponsored studies and independent ones. You can check if a study is independent by looking at its main contributors.
Those on evolution are almost exclusively independent (because there's not much incentive for corpos to fund these studies anyways).
The ones on physoestrogen are funded by parasitic corporations.There is a difference between corporate sponsored studies and independent ones. You can check if a study is independent by looking at its main contributors.
Those on evolution are almost exclusively independent (because there's not much incentive for corpos to fund these studies anyways).
You are Soygoy 2.0.There is a difference between corporate sponsored studies and independent ones. Independent studies don't work with a predetermined conclusion which is a core aspect of true science. You can check if a study is independent by looking at its main contributors.
Those on evolution are almost exclusively independent (because there's not much incentive for corpos to fund these studies anyways).
You can check sponsors for studies you know? The 2008 one I mentioned is mostly university grants. There is one company involved but I checked it and it doesn't sell anything but nutrition advice.The ones on physoestrogen are funded by parasitic corporations.
I’m going to stop arguing since I don’t feel like pretending to be retarded anymore right now. It was fun to argue with you doeWell no, it wouldn't. But this is a retarded hypothetical because evolution very clearly exists. It's like saying physicists made up atom theory.
Still liars and commies.You can check sponsors for studies you know? The 2008 one I mentioned is mostly university grants. There is one company involved but I checked it and it doesn't sell anything but nutrition advice.View attachment 107190
Here's another study from 2001 where they gave isoflavone to men for two months and nothing happened. Funded by the Rowett Research Institute.
![]()
Effect of a phytoestrogen food supplement on reproductive health in normal males - PubMed
Animal studies and human intervention trials have demonstrated the cancer chemopreventive properties of plant phytoestrogens, and phytoestrogen supplements are now widely available 'over-the-counter'. However, consumption of phytoestrogen-rich diets can cause impaired fertility and reproductive...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
So you're resorting to international conspiracy shit again? Seems like you lost this argumentStill liars and commies.
Wow, dumb prodigy child idiot sheeple.So you're resorting to international conspiracy shit again? Seems like you lost this argument![]()
I read it and it seems to be a mixture of standard conservative takes and schizobabble. What does this prove THOUGHInstitute for the Study of Globalization and Covert Politics (ISGP)
Focused on supranational politics, globalization, covert politics, and conspiracy.www.isgp-studies.com