Datamining How many random people would you cause to die in order to become the perfect human specimen

Thread is being monitored by all alphabet agencies

Lism

Groyperous...
Joined
May 17, 2024
Messages
1,414
300 IQ, perfect clarity of mind, 6'5, effortlessly muscular/shredded, brilliant immune system, max bench press and deadlift achieved in history for reps, pure aristocratic lineage, 100 billion dollars, and a 10 in looks. You are also likely to live to the age of 130 and age well. You get all this, when you press the button, but when you press the button n random people die. Would you press the button at n=1? How about 5? 10? What is the maximum n where you would avoid pressing the button.

By the way, you are included in the random people, so there is a possibility you will kill yourself by pressing the button.
 
Mongolia has a population density of 2 people per square kilometer. This means that countries don’t need more than that to function. The earth is roughly 150,000,000 square kilometers (only including land). 150,000,000 x 2 = 300,000,000. Since the population is around 8,200,000,000, n = 7,900,000,000.
However, since I’m also included in this number, this means that I have a roughly 3.66% chance of survival. Pressing the button doesn’t really feel worth it unless I have at least a 50% chance of survival.
Final answer: n = 4,100,000,000.
 
Any amount since I'd use this new specimen of mine to rebuild Earth and be a prophet of God. As long as the good ones die painlessly.
 
Mongolia has a population density of 2 people per square kilometer. This means that countries don’t need more than that to function. The earth is roughly 150,000,000 square kilometers (only including land). 150,000,000 x 2 = 300,000,000. Since the population is around 8,200,000,000, n = 7,900,000,000.
However, since I’m also included in this number, this means that I have a roughly 3.66% chance of survival. Pressing the button doesn’t really feel worth it unless I have at least a 50% chance of survival.
Final answer: n = 4,100,000,000.
If 7.9 billion people instantly died countries would not be equipped to handle it though
 
If 7.9 billion people instantly died countries would not be equipped to handle it though
I know there would be some issues at first, but over time we would create societies that should in theory work with only 2 people per square kilometer. I could probably figure it out since I have 300 iq.
 
I know there would be some issues at first, but over time we would create societies that should in theory work with only 2 people per square kilometer. I could probably figure it out since I have 300 iq.
We wouldn't have enough people to produce good stuff though. Mongolia probably imports a lot of it
 
We wouldn't have enough people to produce good stuff though. Mongolia probably imports a lot of it
Japan, china and the netherlands have a couple “lights out” factories that don’t require workers, so if we just make more of those there shouldn’t be any issues. The one in japan even makes robots.
 
Well I'm going to die regardless whether it be 64 or 130 and I don't want to be the direct reason a bunch of people one day croaked on the streets even if they hopefully died painlessly, and even if they don't know that it was me who caused it.
 
I wouldn't kill anybody because that would be very unkind.
chosen stare.png
 
~100,000,000. Any more than that and there could be long term effects that impact my ability to enjoy my newfound strengths, and a 1.25% chance of dying is good.
 
Back
Top