Serious How do Muslims justify Mohamed's 9 year old wife?

[Canadian]

Again you keep linking the google doc but all it says is "there isn't any evidence besides the Hadith and the Hadith is wrong so he's actually 19 and not 9"
BTW most sources say she could be as old as 15-16, which is the youngest possible age for Mary so you should argue that instead of pretending that Mohamed waited exactly until his wife was past the 2024 American AOC.

If you want to get deboonked read this

https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateReligion/comments/isefiz

 

[Canadian]

Besides, even if she was a few years older, the fact that a major Islamic document could say that and not either be thrown out, or make you guys question your beliefs just shows that it was not a big deal to marry a child in Islamic culture, and still isn't, unless you need to own Christian chuds.

 

[ppp]

This was debunked moron

Dolmatov, M

Aisha was not 9 years old but (19–20) years old when married to Holy Prophet Muhammad (s) 9 years age of Aisha which you point out is not mentioned in Holy Quran - verbatim words of God but It is mentioned in Sahih Bukhari. This hadith is simply fabricated lie | Sahih Bukhari is not verbatim w...

docs.google.com

it wasn't debunked, she was mentioned to serveral times as a child via hadiths that are recorded
either accept mohammed liked little girls or you can divert through lies or something goy

 

[ukrainian_chad]

Even if they can somehow justify such acts, when you take into account the historical acts of Muhammad and compare them to Jesus, you can see which side is purer and which side is not corrupted through sin and lies. One spread through peace and gospel, another spread through war, force and warlordism. If you think this is not true and somehow Islam is right and the religion of peace, look at Lebanon, think of the Greeks, Assyrians, Armenians, Egyptian Copts, all these groups in some part driven out from the middle east because they were majority christian, in the 1900s the middle east was 13% christian, now it is only 5% these are all modern examples, think of all the other groups that were not heard of and never survived until the modern age.

From 6.98% of all wars that were related to religion the percentage becomes less than half that, at 3.23%, if you subtract those waged in the name of Islam (66%)
When you give muslims total control over a state you get Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, The Islamic Caliphate. When you give christians total control over a state you get... Western civilization, the renaissance, great colonial empires, and so on. We could talk on and on and on, i could argue, why would the Quran only be possible to be read authentically in Arabic to be fully understood, would it not be quite close minded from God? So many things.

The Islamic Golden Age does not even come close to what Christendom achieved.
And i still question, and i still wonder, how utterly ignorant and dense it is of Atheists to compare Islam to a religion such as Christianity.

View attachment 80902

wordswordswords nuke poland

 

[evandoe]

Moses killing midianite babies was hecking wholesome chungus doe

 

[Jimb0]

I am legitimately curious how Muslims justify Mohamed having sex with his 9 year old wife,

dey basically say that the times were different back then

 

[Warrior-Z]

@Canadian Hey, retard. Hop in the car, I already gave you a document with evidence refuting it.

 

[Canadian]

@Canadian Hey, retard. Hop in the car, I already gave you a document with evidence refuting it.

What evidence? Your document basically just denies your own religious texts and then claims that she's 19 because She just IS, OKAY?!

Write your actual arguments on the blog, don't link me a random pdf with no context/evidence.
I'm not going on a wild goose chase to find out your arguments.

 

[baqqrih]

Write your actual arguments on the blog, don't link me a random pdf with no context/evidence.
I'm not going on a wild goose chase to find out your arguments.

Since we're on this topic right quick, I quite dislike when people just link documents instead of trying to prove their point with their own words. No insult to Mr. Warrior-Z, of course, but it's a peeve I have when discussing things online with others. If there's a point I've never previously discussed online, and there's a humongous document there that explains it well, I don't take the document and use it as my argument, I use the document as my metal to forge my own tools out of, and so if that point then comes up again in any future discussion, I can go back to my own words to familiarize it in my head again in a way that I can comprehend far better than going back to a document somebody else wrote each time and seeing what was written there. Then, I can also have my own past words prepared for future discussions to then copy and paste (when it actually addresses the specific question at hand, of course), so that I can save time not writing things out a gazillion different times while still having my own words out there to address the specific point that needs to be addressed, instead of trying to adjust a screw with a screwdriver so much larger than it (the oversized screwdriver representing a document with a ton of information that still doesn't answer a specific question that someone is asking).
Once again, with no insult intended towards anyone who has ever done it on here, pasting documents willy-nilly to prove their point, are you really going to let another man's words win your argument for you? Are your own words just not "good enough"? What next, are you going to let another man spend time with your wife in bed, too, because your own performance isn't "good enough" there, either? Don't be some slothful argument cuck, write your own words out. To heck with "saving time" on the first time that you're writing about a point, this is your argument and you're going to win it with your own reasoning, instead of being some soy-chugging rhetoric cuckold and going "control see, control vee, win my argument for me". I would go as far as to say that it is "beta male" behavior, truly. Get better.

 

[NigKiller_Tojo]

mudslimes don't try to justify it, child marriages are very common in mudslime countries

Since we're on this topic right quick, I quite dislike when people just link documents instead of trying to prove their point with their own words. No insult to Mr. Warrior-Z, of course, but it's a peeve I have when discussing things online with others. If there's a point I've never previously discussed online, and there's a humongous document there that explains it well, I don't take the document and use it as my argument, I use the document as my metal to forge my own tools out of, and so if that point then comes up again in any future discussion, I can go back to my own words to familiarize it in my head again in a way that I can comprehend far better than going back to a document somebody else wrote each time and seeing what was written there. Then, I can also have my own past words prepared for future discussions to then copy and paste (when it actually addresses the specific question at hand, of course), so that I can save time not writing things out a gazillion different times while still having my own words out there to address the specific point that needs to be addressed, instead of trying to adjust a screw with a screwdriver so much larger than it (the oversized screwdriver representing a document with a ton of information that still doesn't answer a specific question that someone is asking).
Once again, with no insult intended towards anyone who has ever done it on here, pasting documents willy-nilly to prove their point, are you really going to let another man's words win your argument for you? Are your own words just not "good enough"? What next, are you going to let another man spend time with your wife in bed, too, because your own performance isn't "good enough" there, either? Don't be some slothful argument cuck, write your own words out. To heck with "saving time" on the first time that you're writing about a point, this is your argument and you're going to win it with your own reasoning, instead of being some soy-chugging rhetoric cuckold and going "control see, control vee, win my argument for me". I would go as far as to say that it is "beta male" behavior, truly. Get better.

wordswordswords but trvthnvke, pasting documents means you are not smart enough to make your own arguments so you just copy what others already wrote.

 

[MoonMetropolis]

Stop derailing threads with your mental illness, tranny.

 

[baqqrih]

Stop derailing threads with your mental illness, grinch.

Please do not get this thread off of its topic any further than I already did with my own big remark. You have enough vitriol for this man to where you could make an entire thread dedicated to this matter of your hatred of him, spacious enough for all of your aggressions against our Oriental friend to go in. It would be a good idea for a thread.

 

[FartmingerFuckwadCheeseSte]

I thought this thread said "How do Muslims justify Muhamed beheading his 9 year old wife?"

 

[Canadian]

I thought this bread said "How do Muslims justify Muhamed beheading his 9 year old wife?"

No they didn't do that because Mohamed was really nice to kids. He really liked them.

 

[Victorio]

Even if they can somehow justify such acts, when you take into account the historical acts of Muhammad and compare them to Jesus, you can see which side is purer and which side is not corrupted through sin and lies. One spread through peace and gospel, another spread through war, force and warlordism. If you think this is not true and somehow Islam is right and the religion of peace, look at Lebanon, think of the Greeks, Assyrians, Armenians, Egyptian Copts, all these groups in some part driven out from the middle east because they were majority christian, in the 1900s the middle east was 13% christian, now it is only 5% these are all modern examples, think of all the other groups that were not heard of and never survived until the modern age.

From 6.98% of all wars that were related to religion the percentage becomes less than half that, at 3.23%, if you subtract those waged in the name of Islam (66%)
When you give muslims total control over a state you get Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, The Islamic Caliphate. When you give christians total control over a state you get... Western civilization, the renaissance, great colonial empires, and so on. We could talk on and on and on, i could argue, why would the Quran only be possible to be read authentically in Arabic to be fully understood, would it not be quite close minded from God? So many things.

The Islamic Golden Age does not even come close to what Christendom achieved.
And i still question, and i still wonder, how utterly ignorant and dense it is of Atheists to compare Islam to a religion such as Christianity.

View attachment 80902

Medieval Christians married off 12 year old girls all the time, Rebecca from the Bible was married at 3 years of age, also your religion is quite literally the biggest Jewish psyop in all of history, all of them are really, but (((they))) managed to trick you into quite literally worshipping like a kike on a pike

 

[Mist]

Medieval Christians married off 12 year old girls all the time, Rebecca from the Bible was married at 3 years of age, also your religion is quite literally the biggest Jewish psyop in all of history, all of them are really, but (((they))) managed to trick you into quite literally worshipping like a kike on a pike

You're a fucking retard for taking the ages in Genesis as actual ages (they're shit like 930, 908, etc. Overall, the ages display clear mathematical patterns, leading people to obviously conclude that number symbolism was used to construct them.)

But who am I too blame. You people don't even wish to understand the Bible and then you try to argue about random shit to own the christcuck or however the clitty is leaking. Also, where the fuck even is the verse you're talking about because nowhere in the bible does it even state her age. Look at the toss' below.
Unfortunately due to you being you, a stinky little chuddy you won't even give a shit doe. Not like you want to care and you will continue to call everything you don't like about the world a creation of DA JOOOOOOOS. Grow up.

 

[Warrior-Z]

What evidence? Your document basically just denies your own religious texts and then claims that she's 19 because She just IS, OKAY?!

Write your actual arguments on the blog, don't link me a random pdf with no context/evidence.
I'm not going on a wild goose chase to find out your arguments.

You do realise that sources are cited? Along with the books themselves? You're ignoring the scans within the document and your ignorance shows how you didnt even bother to read it.

 

[Victorio]

You're a fucking retard for taking the ages in Genesis as actual ages (they're raisin like 930, 908, etc. Overall, the ages display clear mathematical patterns, leading people to obviously conclude that number symbolism was used to construct them.)

But who am I too blame. You people don't even wish to understand the Bible and then you try to argue about random raisin to own the christcuck or however the clitty is leaking. Also, where the fuck even is the verse you're talking about because nowhere in the bible does it even state her age. Look at the toss' below.
Unfortunately due to you being you, a stinky little chuddy you won't even give a raisin doe. Not like you want to care and you will continue to call everything you don't like about the world a creation of DA JOOOOOOOS. Grow up.

View attachment 82440

Why would I care to "understand the bible". Religion is a bluepill, and once you take the redpill, there is NO going back. And It's still not disputable that christians oftentimes married off little girls with no issue. This is the ideology you associate with. And yes, da joos created your religion, astroturfed it, and continue using it to encourage cuckservatives to give them their undying support. You willingly turned yourself into a pawn lol. And whatever christkike cope you throw at me regarding rebecca's age hardly matters. Here is more proof for that though. I wasn't even surprised when I saw this fact. Chrikes are so drawn to pedophilia that 4% of catholic priests have molested children, 80% of which are little boys, mostly under 10 years old. These are the people you associate with. Your religion is just about identical to Judaism, and tied to (((them,))) the most invasive and destructive, subversive species on all of earth. It was all the Christian Europeans and Jewish Lobby whom threw away their people just so they can stop the Holocaust, which was a cleansing that the world needed.

 

[nagolbud]

Same way that Catholics and Orthodox justify their pagan church fathers in pharisee dresses dancing around their satanic ass temples fucking' children while giving them orders for salvation...

 

[nagolbud]

Why would I care to "understand the bible". Religion is a bluepill, and once you take the redpill, there is NO going back. And It's still not disputable that christians oftentimes married off little girls with no issue. This is the ideology you associate with. And yes, da joos created your religion, astroturfed it, and continue using it to encourage cuckservatives to give them their undying support. You willingly turned yourself into a pawn lol. And whatever christkike celebrate you throw at me regarding rebecca's age hardly matters. Here is more proof for that though. I wasn't even surprised when I saw this fact. Chrikes are so drawn to pedophilia that 4% of catholic priests have molested children, 80% of which are little boys, mostly under 10 years old. These are the people you associate with. Your religion is just about identical to Judaism, and tied to (((them,))) the most invasive and destructive, subversive species on all of earth. It was all the Christian Europeans and Jewish Lobby whom threw away their people just so they can stop the Holocaust, which was a cleansing that the world needed.

Andrew imiTate thinks he understands and has the "red pill" lawl.
Mainstream normie take.. "da juices did it all"""""" reeeeeee"