Serious How do Muslims justify Mohamed's 9 year old wife?

Designates a thread as a serious discussion

Canadian

Nuke Toronto
🏅
Joined
Mar 2, 2024
Messages
476
This isn't a troll thread or a bait thread.
I am legitimately curious how Muslims justify Mohamed having sex with his 9 year old wife, especially since Muslims seem to be strongly against sexual degeneracy otherwise. They are strongly against troons and the LGBT, for example.

Is there an actual argument for it ? Or do they just pretend it didn't happen?
 
I'm legitimately curious. This is one of the main reasons I will never convert.
That, the fact that Islam promotes Arabic culture as superior, and not being able to drink beer.
 
No, she said that she supports the Islam decision of "after puberty"
Someone asked something like "do you support that/islam's decision" or whatever and she said "yea, it's about age of mind"
The problem is that if a child gets early onset puberty, they would be "mature" without being mature. It's about the mental and physical state of a person. While you could say it's different for each person, age still works well as a general sign of someone being mature or not both physically and mentally.
 
Even if they can somehow justify such acts, when you take into account the historical acts of Muhammad and compare them to Jesus, you can see which side is purer and which side is not corrupted through sin and lies. One spread through peace and gospel, another spread through war, force and warlordism. If you think this is not true and somehow Islam is right and the religion of peace, look at Lebanon, think of the Greeks, Assyrians, Armenians, Egyptian Copts, all these groups in some part driven out from the middle east because they were majority christian, in the 1900s the middle east was 13% christian, now it is only 5% these are all modern examples, think of all the other groups that were not heard of and never survived until the modern age.

From 6.98% of all wars that were related to religion the percentage becomes less than half that, at 3.23%, if you subtract those waged in the name of Islam (66%)
When you give muslims total control over a state you get Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, The Islamic Caliphate. When you give christians total control over a state you get... Western civilization, the renaissance, great colonial empires, and so on. We could talk on and on and on, i could argue, why would the Quran only be possible to be read authentically in Arabic to be fully understood, would it not be quite close minded from God? So many things.

The Islamic Golden Age does not even come close to what Christendom achieved.
And i still question, and i still wonder, how utterly ignorant and dense it is of Atheists to compare Islam to a religion such as Christianity.

1733100968305.png
 
Even if they can somehow justify such acts, when you take into account the historical acts of Muhammad and compare them to Jesus, you can see which side is purer and which side is not corrupted through sin and lies. One spread through peace and gospel, another spread through war, force and warlordism. If you think this is not true and somehow Islam is right and the religion of peace, look at Lebanon, think of the Greeks, Assyrians, Armenians, Egyptian Copts, all these groups in some part driven out from the middle east because they were majority christian, in the 1900s the middle east was 13% christian, now it is only 5% these are all modern examples, think of all the other groups that were not heard of and never survived until the modern age.

From 6.98% of all wars that were related to religion the percentage becomes less than half that, at 3.23%, if you subtract those waged in the name of Islam (66%)
When you give muslims total control over a state you get Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, The Islamic Caliphate. When you give christians total control over a state you get... Western civilization, the renaissance, great colonial empires, and so on. We could talk on and on and on, i could argue, why would the Quran only be possible to be read authentically in Arabic to be fully understood, would it not be quite close minded from God? So many things.

The Islamic Golden Age does not even come close to what Christendom achieved.
And i still question, and i still wonder, how utterly ignorant and dense it is of Atheists to compare Islam to a religion such as Christianity.
Devils advocate here. Christianity spread by converting the Roman Empire which either directly controlled, or influenced the entirety of Europe. Most other cases of spreading happened by conquest be it the conquistadors, or in Africa. The Middle East itself had potential to be more western but due to Christian influence being a holdback at the time (1910-60) for the Muslim population they sought the anti west band of Islam.
 
This isn't a troll thread or a bait thread.
I am legitimately curious how Muslims justify Mohamed having sex with his 9 year old wife, especially since Muslims seem to be strongly against sexual degeneracy otherwise. They are strongly against troons and the LGBT, for example.

Is there an actual argument for it ? Or do they just pretend it didn't happen?
Aisha RA was 19 according to many Islamic historians and theologians, I can give you some evidence.
 
Devils advocate here. Christianity spread by converting the Roman Empire which either directly controlled, or influenced the entirety of Europe. Most other cases of spreading happened by conquest be it the conquistadors, or in Africa. The Middle East itself had potential to be more western but due to Christian influence being a holdback at the time (1910-60) for the Muslim population they sought the anti west band of Islam.
Well, i feel as Christianity has mostly spread through a mix of peaceful evangelism, cultural assimilation, cooperation and political influence, during the times of the Roman Empire it spread peacefully and unlike Islam didn't spread mostly through war and the Caliphate, now obviously sometimes Christianity was intertwined with the expansion of some nations (Reconquista, Colonial Periods) but much of its spread was through the establishment of education institutions, through the establishment of hospitals and other care institutions, perhaps also cultural assimilation and mixture between different regional cultures, through missionary work and so on. Unlike Islam's militaristic spread and conquest.

And yes, the middle east had a chance to be more westernized, Iran could have been genuinely white.
1733101578022.png
 
Aisha RA was 19 according to many Islamic historians and theologians, I can give you some evidence.
>Aisha's age at marriage is debated: traditional hadiths state 9.
And what are Hadiths?
Hadiths are collections of sayings, actions, and approvals of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), as reported by his companions. They serve as a primary source of guidance for Muslims, second only to the Quran.
1733102857498.png

And do muslims even consider hadiths anything worthy?
1733103052765.png

>central to Islamic law
1733103117415.png

lole.
 
>Aisha's age at marriage is debated: traditional hadiths state 9.
And what are Hadiths?
Hadiths are collections of sayings, actions, and approvals of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), as reported by his companions. They serve as a primary source of guidance for Muslims, second only to the Quran.
View attachment 80934
View attachment 80941
>central to Islamic law
View attachment 80942
lole.
And all of this was addressed here:
 
Aisha RA was 19 according to many Islamic historians and theologians, I can give you some evidence.
No she wasn't, not a single Islamic historian said this (regardless of what race or religion they were) before the 1960/70s. While you can argue what age she was exactly, almost everyone knows he was underage.
 
No she wasn't, not a single Islamic historian said this (regardless of what race or religion they were) before the 1960/70s. While you can argue what age she was exactly, almost everyone knows he was underage.
This was debunked moron
 
Back
Top