Debunking that aisha underage

Warrior-Z said:
Spewing random nonsense when he demonstrated it but you admitted to posting them but said "oooh I wasn't in Qafe I only used their memes". Also Joel has been arguing with you for a looooooooooong time now, he should know a thing or two, retarded pigskin.
Click to expand...
Just using a meme magically makes me install discord and adds me to a groomcord now?
Fail.
 
Imperator said:
Just using a meme magically makes me install discord and adds me to a groomcord now?
Click to expand...
You must've gotten it somewhere and lets be real for a second, you are connected to some sketchy people, especially ones from the chinny. You said you knew some personally. When the chinny is a raisinty ass splinter website with O9A raisinters.
 
drcobson said:
i don't have the original image unfortunately but he just looks like a slightly whiter jeet
Click to expand...
99wbvy.jpg
 
>So you think that in order to be a theologian, an Islamic one, you dont need to know the history? Also I do know historians asw geg.
I don't think theologians who are like the chair of islamic societies are trusted nor qualified to give an academic credible account of the unbiased history, no
theology =/= history
>Muslims believe different things some times and there are some Islamic debates that still arise, retard, things such as sects exist too.
>oh it's just like a heckin debated thing it's whatever
apparently it's prevalent enough for pedophilia to be incredibly common in the middle east. if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck.. pisslam is pedophilia
>People protest against it.
the ones enlightened by modern western principles protest it, not the pisslamist terrorist shills like you
 
Warrior-Z said:
You must've gotten it somewhere and lets be real for a second, you are connected to some sketchy people, especially ones from the chinny. You said you knew some personally. When the chinny is a raisinty ass splinter website with O9A raisinters.
Click to expand...
Chuddy was shartypol, now is the chinny not the Chuddy, been a long time gone, shartypol. Now is pedophile's delight on a wave of BMT.
 
  • Gem
Reactions: fdj
Alextremo2TheMax said:
>So you think that in order to be a theologian, an Islamic one, you dont need to know the history? Also I do know historians asw geg.
I don't think theologians who are like the chair of islamic societies are trusted nor qualified to give an academic credible account of the unbiased history, no
theology =/= history
>Muslims believe different things some times and there are some Islamic debates that still arise, retard, things such as sects exist too.
>oh it's just like a heckin debated thing it's whatever
apparently it's prevalent enough for pedophilia to be incredibly common in the middle east. if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck.. pisslam is pedophilia
>People protest against it.
the ones enlightened by modern western principles protest it, not the pisslamist terrorist shills like you
Click to expand...
>don't think theologians who are like the chair of islamic societies are trusted nor qualified to give an academic credible account of the unbiased history, no
So you think that a person who engages or is an expert in Islamic theology wouldn't have a level of authority on the historical aspects when in order to be an Islamic theologian you'd need to know the history since its a crucial part? Thats a non sequitur.
>theology =/= history
We're talking about Islamic theology and you ignored that I can appeal to historians too kek.
>apparently it's prevalent enough for pedophilia to be incredibly common in the middle east.
Which is haram, war is also common in the middle east.
>the ones enlightened by modern western principles protest it
Muslims protest against it too, retard.
 
>So you think that a person who engages or is an expert in Islamic theology wouldn't have a level of authority on the historical aspects when in order to be an Islamic theologian you'd need to know the history since its a crucial part? Thats a non sequitur.
Yes I don't think they do considering they're not a historian. "Knowing the history" is not the same as being a qualified historian.
doesn't know what a non sequitur is award
>We're talking about Islamic theology and you ignored that I can appeal to historians too kek.
you people don't cite historical journals you cite islamic debate society youtube channels and "lectures" by convert shills
>Which is haram, war is also common in the middle east.
>it wasn't real islam you stupid kaffir THIS TIME it will be right
Apparently no muslim society ever has bothered to read their little book of lies properly considering how consistent this "mistake" is
>Muslims protest against it too, retard.
you're not that kind of muslim, you're a generic anti-western-but-living-in-the-west terrorist shill. the muslims that represent western principles better are the same people you would write off as zionist puppets or whatever like saudi or the free syrian army
 
Alextremo2TheMax said:
>So you think that a person who engages or is an expert in Islamic theology wouldn't have a level of authority on the historical aspects when in order to be an Islamic theologian you'd need to know the history since its a crucial part? Thats a non sequitur.
Yes I don't think they do considering they're not a historian. "Knowing the history" is not the same as being a qualified historian.
doesn't know what a non sequitur is award
>We're talking about Islamic theology and you ignored that I can appeal to historians too kek.
you people don't cite historical journals you cite islamic debate society youtube channels and "lectures" by convert shills
>Which is haram, war is also common in the middle east.
>it wasn't real islam you stupid kaffir THIS TIME it will be right
Apparently no muslim society ever has bothered to read their little book of lies properly considering how consistent this "mistake" is
>Muslims protest against it too, retard.
you're not that kind of muslim, you're a generic anti-western-but-living-in-the-west terrorist shill. the muslims that represent western principles better are the same people you would write off as zionist puppets or whatever like saudi or the free syrian army
Click to expand...
Btfo.
 
  • Gem
Reactions: fdj
Imperator said:
No because it isn't my domain.
Click to expand...
Then why'd you say you were?
Alextremo2TheMax said:
>So you think that a person who engages or is an expert in Islamic theology wouldn't have a level of authority on the historical aspects when in order to be an Islamic theologian you'd need to know the history since its a crucial part? Thats a non sequitur.
Yes I don't think they do considering they're not a historian. "Knowing the history" is not the same as being a qualified historian.
doesn't know what a non sequitur is award
>We're talking about Islamic theology and you ignored that I can appeal to historians too kek.
you people don't cite historical journals you cite islamic debate society youtube channels and "lectures" by convert shills
>Which is haram, war is also common in the middle east.
>it wasn't real islam you stupid kaffir THIS TIME it will be right
Apparently no muslim society ever has bothered to read their little book of lies properly considering how consistent this "mistake" is
>Muslims protest against it too, retard.
you're not that kind of muslim, you're a generic anti-western-but-living-in-the-west terrorist shill. the muslims that represent western principles better are the same people you would write off as zionist puppets or whatever like saudi or the free syrian army
Click to expand...
>So you think that a person who engages or is an expert in Islamic theology wouldn't have a level of authority on the historical aspects when in order to be an Islamic theologian you'd need to know the history since its a crucial part? Thats a non sequitur.
>Yes I don't think they do considering they're not a historian.
You don't have to be a historian to have evidence and knowledge within history then confirm it, RETARD. It's backed up by historians themselves, historians teach theologians. And I can define a non sequitur.
>you people don't cite historical journals
Yes, I do? I can give you some right now.
>you cite islamic debate society youtube channels and "lectures" by convert shills
Never did this.
>Apparently no muslim society ever has bothered to read their little book
Quran never said this and this is thourugly debunked, your arguments consist of a misrepresentation of the Quran itself.
>you're not that kind of muslim, you're a generic anti-western-but-living-in-the-west
When was I anti-western again? And I am
>muslims that represent western principles better are the same people you would write off as zionist puppets
Yeah no because those aren't zionist qualities.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top