- Joined
- Apr 1, 2024
- Messages
- 3,689
if soyjaks were made to mock people than that makes slopjaks the most extreme version of soyjak
boorufags trying to make each other ackThe existence of slopjaks reminds me of insects evolving to be more and more resilient to things designed to kill them.
they are fundamentally different doe. Soyjaks are based on real phenomenon and have actual content, slopjaks are just tryhard failure, they felt more like a desperate attempt at trolling if anything (basically everyone has already been aware of it)I used to have a distaste for slopjaks, but now I've realized how absolutely absurd and funny booruGODS are. getting called a esl fnf Venezuelan zoo with a jartycuck speech bubble is absolutely devastating and i wouldnt wish it on my worst enemy. Slopjaks are like what offsiters saw soyjaks as, but since jaks have become mainstream everyone is kinda used to them at this point
change is le bad, agree to disagree, but slopjaks are here to stay.slopjak = zoomer tier meme, no content, no meaning, random, only funny for the underages.
they are fundamentally different doe. Soyjaks are based on real phenomenon and have actual content, slopjaks are just tryhard failure, they felt more like a desperate attempt at trolling if anything (basically everyone has already been aware of it)
slopjak = zoomer tier meme, no content, no meaning, random, only funny for the underages.
they are fundamentally different doe. Soyjaks are based on real phenomenon and have actual content, slopjaks are just tryhard failure, they felt more like a desperate attempt at trolling if anything (basically everyone has already been aware of it)
xhey wouldn't exist in the first place if 'ru has a quality control, even the most rudimentary one would work.change is le bad, agree to disagree, but slopjaks are here to stay.
I'm gay like nagolfan that I can't stop having sexual fantasy with internet randos just likes xe.
muh circlejerk or whateverxhey wouldn't exist in the first place if 'ru has a quality control, even the most rudimentary one would work.
>make fun of people you dont likeView attachment 7260regular soyjaks vs slopjaks
this tbhView attachment 7260regular soyjaks vs slopjaks
regular soyjaks aren't nearly as grotesque as slopjaks doe + it's less about how they look and more about the association with numales/bugmen>make fun of people you dont like
>"look at how ugly and silly they are"
thats how both are used tho
this is the main difference between slopjaks and soyjaks, but still is the same purpose of mocking the other side.regular soyjaks aren't nearly as grotesque as slopjaks doe + it's less about how they look and more about the association with numales/bugmen
Soyjaks are funny because they're accurate and don't require much effort to make their targets seethe. Significantly more seethe goes into making a slopjak than what will come from it.this is the main difference between slopjaks and soyjaks, but still is the same purpose of mocking the other side.
Being called a twitter immigrant pedophile tranny alongside a speechbubble twitter immigrant 'jak image would be catastrophically devastatingI used to have a distaste for slopjaks, but now I've realized how absolutely absurd and funny booruGODS are. getting called a esl fnf Venezuelan zoo with a jartycuck speech bubble is absolutely devastating and i wouldnt wish it on my worst enemy. Slopjaks are like what offsiters saw soyjaks as, but since jaks have become mainstream everyone is kinda used to them at this point