SUPERHELL Ban megathread

[Fagon]

Trust

okay I trust.

 

[Sneedson]

okay I trust.

Good

 

[Fortuna]

Good
View attachment 56558

He has very feminine eyes.

 

[Sneedson]

He has very feminine eyes.

Okay?

 

[Fagon]

Good
View attachment 56558

ciggies look cool I wish i was a smoker

 

[Sneedson]

I don't think I came off as angry, I think I expressed myself rather well. I just don't appreciate being slandered on my own profile due to a disagreement.

Don’t get so stuck up chuddy

Yeah I goon to ugugu and what?

So that’s why you defend your anime baby porn so much

I don't mean to say you're projecting but you do seem to have personal experience with the sort of rabbithole you describe. I mean no slander nor am I asking for a conformation or elaboration, I could be entirely wrong, but it does sound like you've got your senses over-tuned due to falling victim to such pitfalls yourself, or being exposed to such indecency (willingly or otherwise). As if you've gotten PTSD from seeing too much depravity and now you're reacting to the smallest of things.

Making a lot of assumptions based on basically nothing Spassy Spas
>a lot of kids are being exposed to online filth which is a bad thing
>woah xista you must be a child groomer or something
>refuses to actually address any of the points made
I’m so so sowwy for making fun of your pastime of grooming kids on cord but atleast address the points I made instead of making odd assumptions just because you’re a discord groomer

This is where you lose me. I don't think it follows, if he was having loli pfp I could see your point but agugu is just too much of a nothingburger, whether or not he's actually a pedophile. I mean unless you want to say doll is an ABDL pedo because of the babyjaks thing I don't see the consistency.

>a drawing of an anime character with child size proportions put in odd situations is actually normal and aryan o algo
Woodchipper

And I understand that, and I didn't defend ILC. I think he pushed the limits too hard, was too sus, and I think that for once the jannies showed due discretion and were reasonably charitable to him. I took issue with an absurd notion that a baby reaching for a jar of cookies is pedophilic or only posted by pedophiles and that only pedophiles could disagree with that notion. As I said, I cannot abide manufactured outrage. I come to the internet to be free, not to follow the flock with whatever witch hunt nothingburger is currently happening. It really pisses me off when people make drama and moral crusades over such inconsequential things as babyjaks or agugu or whatever have you.

Stop defending pedos you weird guy

Anyways I gotta get back to gooning to my loli folder and grooming kids on discord cya, #MAPRIGHTS

I’m calling da police

I trans heart Peter Scully and Jeffery Epstein

Ok niggerpedo

 

[LordThrembo]

honestly im suprised it took this long to ban ILC, since everytime i checked the banlog he was always on there

 

[DAKODERMA]

Not having kids or adults flirt with each other on my soyboy forum
Cordnigger
Cordnigger
Cordnigger + disgusting faggot freakshow that was raised by the computer and dumped on my doorstep
By order of the FDL
Cordnigger
FDL's orders
Gay nigger that everyone disliked
The next on the list if I keep hearing about this cordnigger buddy of yours

i wonder if any of these are still lurking

 

[XXX_SKIBIDISIGMA_XXX]

you painted a target on yourself
it was going to happen one day with that pfp and your ironic fag persona

Xhe is an unironic fag thoughie

 

[Fortuna]

i wonder if any of these are still lurking

Redditor might be.

 

[Spasoje's Revenge]

Don’t get so stuck up chuddy

Heed your own advice.

Making a lot of assumptions based on basically nothing Spassy Spas
>a lot of kids are being exposed to online filth which is a bad thing
>woah xista you must be a child groomer or something
>refuses to actually address any of the points made
I’m so so sowwy for making fun of your pastime of grooming kids on cord but atleast address the points I made instead of making odd assumptions just because you’re a discord groomer

I didn't discredit or take issue with the point you were making, nor did I insinuate you were malicious. I noticed a behavioral peculiarity on your part and extrapolated, with a lot of tact, an explanation. I handled it with due diligence as it is a touchy subject, I didn't antagonize you or lock you into denying or confirming anything (I do notice you call the assumptions odd, rather than false, but I'm not trying to extract a confession). The notion I was presenting is that exposure to filth makes you more sensitive to anything even loosely tangential to it. I am not a psycho analyst but it is a logical conclusion. Whether one is slightly or significantly sexually depraved, recovering or recovered, or simply scared by involuntary exposure, that he would be a lot more sensitive in regards to what he perceives to be sexual deviancy. I was not accusing you of being a "child groomer", nor did I counter signal what you said. I was extremely tactful and careful with my words.

I trans heart Peter Scully and Jeffery Epstein

Ok niggerpedo

Even this, I don't know who peter scully is but you do, you're obviously more in tune with this side of the internet than I am. (again, this isn't an accusation or an attack on your character)
And what's the point of apologizing for lashing out if you're just going to chimp out right after?
>you missed your beauty sleep dood
I saw the sun has risen so I decided to go engage with our lovely Serbian bureaucracy instead

 

[XXX_SKIBIDISIGMA_XXX]

Holy shit there are so many pages os just arguing and arguing! Guess i won, ILoveCoals is never getting unbanned.

 

[Sagehardt]

sneed

 

[ukrainian_chad]

sneed

ur a shitskin lol

 

[Sagehardt]

ur a shitskin lol

So?

 

[Sneeder]

For posting loli porn

That was plato doe

 

[Sneeder]

has their been a person banned for pedophilia that wasnt a pedo?

Basil

 

[Sneedson]

I didn't discredit or take issue with the point you were making, nor did I insinuate you were malicious. I noticed a behavioral peculiarity on your part and extrapolated, with a lot of tact, an explanation. I handled it with due diligence as it is a touchy subject, I didn't antagonize you or lock you into denying or confirming anything (I do notice you call the assumptions odd, rather than false, but I'm not trying to extract a confession). The notion I was presenting is that exposure to filth makes you more sensitive to anything even loosely tangential to it. I am not a psycho analyst but it is a logical conclusion. Whether one is slightly or significantly sexually depraved, recovering or recovered, or simply scared by involuntary exposure, that he would be a lot more sensitive in regards to what he perceives to be sexual deviancy. I was not accusing you of being a "child groomer", nor did I counter signal what you said. I was extremely tactful and careful with my words.

?

Heed your own advice.

Takes the bald man with glasses forum seriously award

Even this, I don't know who peter scully is but you do, you're obviously more in tune with this side of the internet than I am. (again, this isn't an accusation or an attack on your character)

Wikipedia

And what's the point of apologizing for lashing out if you're just going to chimp out right after?

Cuz

dood

Tranny

 

[Redditor]

Redditor might be.

 

[Chimperator]

Well I'm glad to hear it wasn't active malice and just an unfortunate wording.

And that's exactly why I don't see them as equal. I haven't seen a single agugu post that was in any way sexual, nor do I see how you could make it sexual when agugu looks like a sack of potatos with stumps for limbs.
I just really have a bone to pick with manufactured outrage of this sorts, where people start witch hunts and moral crusades over absolute nothingburgers

There is porn of agugu.