• Site is being DDOS'd by the shroom (they're DDOSing us and its slowing the soyjak blog)
    >over 1000 guests while about 30+ users are active

SUPERHELL Ban megathread

Okay, I guess the guest-posting is finally over. Anyways let's try to shift ban-discussion topics away from talking about kiddie diddlers. Who do you think should be unbanned? Here's my short list:
  • Gapey
    • Literally did nothing wrong. Huge falseflag ban.
  • loafz
    • By looking at his pfp, he is clearly a poor Jarty refugee in need of a new home. He probably didn't know 'cord was despised here.
  • Gii
    • Banned because janny didn't like xim (I think)
  • Acro
    • Everyone loved him and he was a well-respected member.
  • ILoveVesna
    • I don't know what Rule 3 is but it can't be that bad.
  • westernbagel
    • My nigga Rye didn't even get to post.
  • PrincessSparkles
    • We need more diversity and inclusion to make us look better to investors.
  • Basil
    • I forgot what he did, something with Terry.
  • Redditor
    • diaperedsoytanp.com isn't a hostile site, I think his ban is unjustified
Not having kids or adults flirt with each other on my soyboy forum
Cordnigger
Cordnigger
Cordnigger + disgusting faggot freakshow that was raised by the computer and dumped on my doorstep
By order of the FDL
Cordnigger
FDL's orders
Gay nigger that everyone disliked
The next on the list if I keep hearing about this cordnigger buddy of yours
 
How are you even arguing about this still lol? He said touhou girls were "hot" and "goonworthy" and when I said that they all look 9 years he said "[finding] fictional characters attractive is [not] the same as being a real life pedophile" and said I wasn't hecking normal for thinking otherwise.
I don't think the recent discussion was over whether ILC was a pedo or not and rather just one about if posting "agugu" was something done by pedos. Something I also noticed was that the guest accounts claiming to all be ILC all stopped posting at the same time.
 
I don't think the recent discussion was over whether ILC was a pedo or not and rather just one about if posting "agugu" was something done by pedos. Something I also noticed was that the guest accounts claiming to all be ILC all stopped posting at the same time.
>inb4 all accounts were ILC false flagging false flaggings
 
Not having kids or adults flirt with each other on my soyboy forum
Cordnigger
Cordnigger
Cordnigger + disgusting faggot freakshow that was raised by the computer and dumped on my doorstep
By order of the FDL
Cordnigger
FDL's orders
Gay nigger that everyone disliked
The next on the list if I keep hearing about this cordnigger buddy of yours
don't be so hard on yourself
 
Maybe I overreacted a bit, I think, because I still don't really know why your angry.

I assumed that you thought the screenshot I posted was completely harmless and there was nothing wrong with it, when I thought it's disgusting fetish art that only appeals to perverted Internet degens. Was I wrong in believing this or not?
But believe me I do think that people who post shit like that, whether ironic or not, are very suspect. We live in an age where young people are raised online all the time, whether it be due to uncaring parents not bothering to do their jobs or out of an escape from their real lives, and due to this people are exposed to extremely vile things at such a young age and as such it desensitizes them and strips them of their morality, thus leading them down dark paths.

I think this is ILoveCoals situation. After years of frying his brain due to Internet usage and porn addiction, he developed sick fetishes, it explains why he was constantly telling that 18 year old girl he was going to rape her due to years of seeing women being treated as cum dumpsters and sex objects, it's completely warped his view on women and can't interact with them like a normal human being.

And that ugugu shit that he made his entire personality around is, I can only assume, an effect due to exposure to Japanese cartoons (anime) where they literally sexualise children in all of their media.

TL;DR, I just get really fucking sick and tired of all these 'irony bros' who make all kinds of sick and perverted 'jokes' about the most vile shit, get backflash and deflect it by saying "it's just a joke bruh". But in reality they're just telling you who they really are and what they really believe and when someone who's not a terminally online freak gets weirded out they have the 'joke defence' ready. it's just really annoying and upsetting that so many people have normalised pedophilia and porn addiction baked into their communities nowadays so coming across degenerate shit like actual csam is inevitable and a direct cause of these 'ironic jokes'.
(sry for lashing out)
I thought this was a copy pasta for a minute
 
The next on the list if I keep hearing about this cordnigger buddy of yours
Okay xir I don't wanna be banished into Shemmyhell [doctos][doctos][doctos] I promise no more dsp and 'cord jokes I kneel Imma kiss your feet admin pls pls pls you jannies are well paid and I appreciate your work on keeping the Sharty clean for good pay. Everyone on that list are banned for good reason I agree si mi senior [doctos][doctos][doctos]
 
I thought your careless offensive post on /srs/ would have gotten you locked from it.

Anyways by order of DOLL I can no longer defend Discord users so I'm probably not going to interact ITT that much anymore and any mentions of 'cord to me will be taken as ban bait and ignored. Imma go sleep night night.
 
Maybe I overreacted a bit, I think, because I still don't really know why your angry.
I don't think I came off as angry, I think I expressed myself rather well. I just don't appreciate being slandered on my own profile due to a disagreement.
I assumed that you thought the screenshot I posted was completely harmless and there was nothing wrong with it, when I thought it's disgusting fetish art that only appeals to perverted Internet degens. Was I wrong in believing this or not?
I don't see what harm you see in the screenshot, I'm not going to feign outrage over a sack of potatos.
>oh but there's some really weird people who could sexualize the sack of potatos
and there's some that sexualzie door knobs yet I don't think anyone who uses a door knob is a sexual deviant. If you see a sack of potatos with stumps for limbs as being in any way fetishized then you've got some sort of PTSD that's motivating you to overreact over nothing.
But believe me I do think that people who post shit like that, whether ironic or not, are very suspect. We live in an age where young people are raised online all the time, whether it be due to uncaring parents not bothering to do their jobs or out of an escape from their real lives, and due to this people are exposed to extremely vile things at such a young age and as such it desensitizes them and strips them of their morality, thus leading them down dark paths.
I don't mean to say you're projecting but you do seem to have personal experience with the sort of rabbithole you describe. I mean no slander nor am I asking for a conformation or elaboration, I could be entirely wrong, but it does sound like you've got your senses over-tuned due to falling victim to such pitfalls yourself, or being exposed to such indecency (willingly or otherwise). As if you've gotten PTSD from seeing too much depravity and now you're reacting to the smallest of things.
And that ugugu shit that he made his entire personality around is, I can only assume, an effect due to exposure to Japanese cartoons (anime) where they literally sexualise children in all of their media.
This is where you lose me. I don't think it follows, if he was having loli pfp I could see your point but agugu is just too much of a nothingburger, whether or not he's actually a pedophile. I mean unless you want to say doll is an ABDL pedo because of the babyjaks thing I don't see the consistency.
TL;DR, I just get really fucking sick and tired of all these 'irony bros' who make all kinds of sick and perverted 'jokes' about the most vile shit, get backflash and deflect it by saying "it's just a joke bruh". But in reality they're just telling you who they really are and what they really believe and when someone who's not a terminally online freak gets weirded out they have the 'joke defence' ready. it's just really annoying and upsetting that so many people have normalised pedophilia and porn addiction baked into their communities nowadays so coming across degenerate shit like actual csam is inevitable and a direct cause of these 'ironic jokes'.
And I understand that, and I didn't defend ILC. I think he pushed the limits too hard, was too sus, and I think that for once the jannies showed due discretion and were reasonably charitable to him. I took issue with an absurd notion that a baby reaching for a jar of cookies is pedophilic or only posted by pedophiles and that only pedophiles could disagree with that notion. As I said, I cannot abide manufactured outrage. I come to the internet to be free, not to follow the flock with whatever witch hunt nothingburger is currently happening. It really pisses me off when people make drama and moral crusades over such inconsequential things as babyjaks or agugu or whatever have you.
Bottom line is: No hard feelings (despite getting slandered), I'm going to bed. I'm long overdue my beauty sleep.
>inb4 wordswordswords ain't no one readin allat
 
Captain coalist didn't post pedophile worship edits and he didn't break any rules, he was the one talking about how peter scully sigma edits aren't pol culture.The other pirateflags hated the schlog so they'd have no reason to make an account here
@DOLL Free my nigga he dindu nuffin
he admitted to posting cunny edits
 
This is a soyjackkk site why does this shit always turn into salem pedophile trials
soipoopas can’t control themselves
pepedepress.jpeg
 
Back
Top