Ban sexual deviants?

[DOLL]

Should I (not janny) take harsher measures against sexual deviants on the site to remove them?
This is referring to furries, gays, queers, trannies, fags, and other nonce-tier categories of people.

Pros: Less gay homoeroticism, disruptive users drop by 80%, more focused discussion on shit everyone cares about

Cons: Makes me have to ban more people (coal), increased angst from teenagers saying muh corrupt janny, less freedom of speech (the statue of liberty will cry)

 

[ArBcswqnxNobgkdgULRxknEtLw]

Destroy every autistic person who isn't exactly like me

 

[Gii’s 10th name]

>bans everyone

 

[Sneeder]

Should I (not janny) take harsher measures against sexual deviants on the site to remove them?
This is referring to furries, gays, queers, trannies, fags, and other nonce-tier categories of people.

Pros: Less gay homoeroticism, disruptive users drop by 80%, more focused discussion on shit everyone cares about

Cons: Makes me have to ban more people (coal), increased angst from teenagers saying muh corrupt janny, less freedom of speech (the statue of liberty will cry

I think depends on what kind of shit they post. No one would mind a few jokes but stuff like malzy is the pinnacle of yakub hell

 

[Gem Control]

YES ban shitstainbul

 

[Gii’s 10th name]

Same guy btw

 

[Yiaagwababy or whatever]

>Soicucks against rulecucking.
>Want more rulecucking than 4chan.

 

[NT]

do it even if it includes me

 

[ukrainian_chad]

no

 

[Sneeder]

Tie gods, are we gonna tie this poll too?

 

[Sagehardt]

Rulecuck the site more

 

[kingdavey]

Bro ban the pedos I need people to make fun of bro

 

[Gii’s 10th name]

Bro ban the pedos I need people to make fun of bro

Bro is just bait at this point

 

[Steve]

Should I (not janny) take harsher measures against sexual deviants on the site to remove them?
This is referring to furries, gays, queers, trannies, fags, and other nonce-tier categories of people.

Pros: Less gay homoeroticism, disruptive users drop by 80%, more focused discussion on shit everyone cares about

Cons: Makes me have to ban more people (coal), increased angst from teenagers saying muh corrupt janny, less freedom of speech (the statue of liberty will cry)

Don't ban them just banish them to only posting in /dump/, I think that would be much more fair.

 

[Chimperator]

You want to retire?

 

[Fagon]

Who currently on the site would be banned doe? Just malzy?

 

[kingdavey]

Bro is just bait at this point

You're a pedophile sympathetic bro

 

[NT]

Should I (not janny) take harsher measures against sexual deviants on the site to remove them?
This is referring to furries, gays, queers, trannies, fags, and other nonce-tier categories of people.

Pros: Less gay homoeroticism, disruptive users drop by 80%, more focused discussion on shit everyone cares about

Cons: Makes me have to ban more people (coal), increased angst from teenagers saying muh corrupt janny, less freedom of speech (the statue of liberty will cry)

Post the list of people who will get nuked albeit

 

[Hoot]

All people who vote no are sexual deviants

 

[Gii’s 10th name]

Let doll decide is just yes but with more rulecucking