• Site is being DDOS'd by the shroom

Chud Steadfastly oppose bourgeois moralism! Uphold Revolutionary terror! Smash the bourgeoisie counterrevolution!

Joined
Jun 27, 2024
Messages
8,380
I keep running into a particularly insidious type of revisionism. The "Think of the children" revisionism. It is stated repeatedly by disguised fascists, royalists and liberals LARPing as communists misusing the concept of empathy. That ruling class children can be re-educated and failing that, sent to a labor camp. Let me be clear. The brats of the petite-bourgeoisie, of the bourgeoisie and of the aristocracy cannot be rehabilitated or re-educated under any circumstance. They must all be liquidated alongside their inbred pedophile worker hating parents. It is not the duty of the dictatorship of the proletariat to waste precious and limited resources attempting to coddle and re-educate children who, in 99% of circumstances, will grow up to be precisely like their parents. To secretly harbor counter-revolutionary opinions and collaborate amongst themselves to foment bourgeoisie counter-revolution. I don't care if they're in diapers, you put a bullet in their fucking head. Morality is not real, it is a theistic bourgeoisie construct regarding property relations. It does not matter if this is "good" or "bad". You put the bullet in the bourgeoisie baby's brain or he will grow up to kill you and everyone you love and destroy everything you've fought for. Do you understand? If not, you are a liberal a fascist a royalist and you ought to be hung by your genitals by the nearest lamppost. You are not my "comrade", you are a coward. Vermin to be exterminated alongside the ruling class. Their children, their pets and their lickspittle servants. This isn't a question of "nurture vs nature" either. This is a question of risk minimization and victory maximization. I am not "weird" or a "freak" or hating children for understanding this. Take heed from Mark Twain who, despite being a feckless bourgeoisie 19th century liberal, was perfectly capable of understanding the need for revolutionary terror. "There were two 'reigns of terror'. If we would but remember it and consider it. One wrought in murder and passion, the other in heartless cold blood. One lasted mere months, the other for a thousand years. One inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred million. But our shudders, are all for the horrors of that minor terror. The momentary terror, so to speak. Whereas what is the horror of swift death by the axe compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty and heartbreak? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake. A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief terror which we have all been taught diligently to shiver at and mourn over, but all France could hardly contain the coffins held by that older and real terror. That unspeakably bitter and awful terror, which none of us have been taught to see in it's vastness or pity as it deserves." When the time comes, I don't care if it's your local laundromat owner. I don't care if it's a guy running a hotdog stand. He is bourgeoisie. You will execute the entire family, or you will be executed alongside them. The pets the maids, doesn't matter. Kill kill kill.

pg111-1856485558.jpg
 
Last edited:
>Y-you heckin MURDERED thousands of fascist army officers in Katyn!!
Yes.
>recognizes a single incident
>establishes himself as winner despite not elaborating further on the other ones

Keyed or leaking xis clitty? Call it
 
>recognizes a single incident
>establishes himself as winner despite not elaborating further on the other ones

Keyed or leaking xis clitty? Call it
The others are just famines early on in the history caused by WW1, civil war and severe drought. No one ever talks about famines under non-communist states for some reason, nor do they acknowledge that the Soviet Union never had a famine after those early ones. Also kulaks being selfish little fucks and burning crop fields and killing livestock.
 
The others are just famines early on in the history caused by WW1, civil war and severe drought. No one ever talks about famines under non-communist states for some reason, nor do they acknowledge that the Soviet Union never had a famine after those early ones. Also kulaks being selfish little fucks and burning crop fields and killing livestock.
But wasn't the Holodomor (part of the existent 1930 famine) purposely made worse by the Soviet government? I understand why Stalin's cabinet could interpret the kulaks' revolt as a threat but there was no need to purposely cut off governmental supplies and a create a smaller, man-made famine together with making millions of non-complicit (innocent) women and children die of starvation.
 
But wasn't the Holodomor (part of the existent 1930 famine) purposely made worse by the Soviet government? I understand why Stalin's cabinet could interpret the kulaks' revolt as a threat but there was no need to purposely cut off governmental supplies and a create a smaller, man-made famine together with making millions of non-complicit (innocent) women and children die of starvation.
Holodomor wasnt intentional thats liberal fake news. No proof.
 
Holodomor wasnt intentional thats liberal fake news. No proof.
So why did Stalin and his propagandra ministry ban any discussion of said famine? When events like this are banned from discussion in these types of states it usually means the state itself was involved with said affair, be it for general lack of attention or purposeful suppression.
 
So why did Stalin and his propagandra ministry ban any discussion of said famine? When events like this are banned from discussion in these types of states it usually means the state itself was involved with said affair, be it for general lack of attention or purposeful suppression.
Why would they allow discussion of it? It was a done deal and anyone mentioning it would just be using it as propaganda against the state. Constructive discussions of events were allowed, but simple propaganda of "STALIN GENOCIDED UKRAIIINIAAAANS" would obviously be banned.
 
Back
Top