• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

Do you believe in the moon landing

title


  • Total voters
    38
If there was a chance the moon landing was fake, the Soviets/Russia would be seething about it to this day so I believe it happened
The live broadcast could be fake thoughever, but we've definitely been on the moon
this is what i was about to say
the soviets wouldve made a huge fuss about it, considering they won pretty much everything else in the space race
it was a massive blow to their national image iirc
read the N1 wikipedia article if you want to have a laugh, literally every single one exploded
 
I have family who were involved in it, so yes, I do.
The family in question.
NOTHING TO SEE HERE.png
 
It's suspicious and I'm leaning into believing it's all made up, but I don't care enough to actually read up on the subject so I'll just say I don't know
 
>yeah the organization with the budget of a small country's GDP just didn't bother keeping around schematics lol
>yeah the guy who knew how to build the rocket died

I can't tell which is funnier for a reply
It wasn't a singular guy, the metaphor isn't exact, as you obviously wouldn't have a full team building a single bike, and if you don't understand it, I can't make you.
 
It wasn't a singular guy, the metaphor isn't exact, as you obviously wouldn't have a full team building a single bike, and if you don't understand it, I can't make you.
Of course I understand it's a team that built a rocket, but that team had to design schematics for the rocket, instructions for other engineers and workers who were building it, basically making an IKEA manual for every step of the process at every point in manufacturing, there's no shot nasa didn't think to preserve schematics to a FUCKING ROCKET. I mean this is some shit lifted straight out of warhammer 40k
 
People often underestimate the amount of work and EXACT calculations that went into making all of this happen. It's not like you could keep a couple blueprints for this and have a new rocket ready to go in a year, not after this long, nor would there be any real reason to do so.

Put simply, we have the diagrams, we know the basics, but we don't have the same experts that we did, we don't have the same factories that created the parts used, and even if we built a perfect replica of the rocket we used back then, there's no guarantee that it would be good for anything. It would have to be exact, same weight, astronauts that weight exactly the same, and that also means using old, outdated technology. Why go to space with that? What would we gain from doing that? If they find a reason to go back, they'll be doing it with new stuff, and it will be expensive as hell, just like last time.
 
Back
Top