Circular argument we've been over how a marriage doesn't automatically involve sex immediately.
He was a pedophile.
Fem altfagged after the ban to ban evade, that's not why he was banned.
Except the marriage was consumated 9.... she was married at 6.
I wasn't behind the ban but since he ban evaded nothing can be done.
Just look at what Hamas_2 said
Hamas_2's argument boils down to rejecting the hadiths. All sunni muslims accept the hadiths and sparkles is sunni so you're just grasping at straws.
No he wasn't, he played some random furry porn game on steam that had a character that, according to soygoy, "looked petite". I dug through the chudditical thread to find out the name a minute ago, and the character literally had boobs. Still gross doe and I don't care that he was banned, but he was ultimately banned because people didn't like him because he's a weird furry gooner, not for being a pedophile. Way less than what parkles did btw.
I wasn't behind the ban.
If I had actually cared about the user and if this was brought up in the original discussion then I wouldn't have moralfagged over it.
Yeah, and you didn't bother to reverse those bans either. Almost like the schlog has always banned bad users over far less.
I didn't follow the chudlittical situation personally. In fact I think I was gone when it happened. All I heard was that he was proven to be a pedophile so I didn't bother looking any further.
