- Joined
- Apr 24, 2024
- Messages
- 17,832
*a loud saaar could be heard*I wasn't accusing you of anything, Pablo. Work on your reading comprehension, vato.
*a loud saaar could be heard*I wasn't accusing you of anything, Pablo. Work on your reading comprehension, vato.
He kind of asked for it by constantly reversing Froot's decisions.
Why even oppose Froot when you knew full well this would happen?
The only real thing here is that Frootcord essentially owns the site so Froot can do whatever the fuck he wants. I'm not saying I endorse this but that's how it is so might aswell just get over it. None of your arguments matter when 'Froot said so' is a sufficient enough reason for a ban.
After the first part of the drama I literally let her get banned, I said I'd wait for Broot.I think sparkles should be banned but X immigrant should also get his admin account back
I just like to acknowledge reality as it is. I'm not too fond of Froot either. Albeit I think he's right in this instance.
I didn't say what she did was the same, but child marriage is not inherently pedophilic, this is something you've said yourself. Nor is it bannable to advocate for it now, that is what you've been arguing the past hour. So yes, I'm allowed to post little anime girls and talk about how much I want for the age of consent to be lowered so I can have a trad 6 year old wife like my best bro muhahhmed.It's definitely the same for sure.
i don't really care abt this whole situationtrve, he's on her side but I don't recall having seen him actually make a defense for her. Plus they're in an offsite instacord together so who cares what he thinks about it?
and yes, it's totally 100% logical for "child marriage" to not include raping said child, this is not pedophilic whatsoever saars, i proooomise.I didn't say what she did was the same, but child marriage is not inherently pedophilic, this is something you've said yourself. Nor is it bannable to advocate for it now, that is what you've been arguing the past hour. So yes, I'm allowed to post little anime girls and talk about how much I want for the age of consent to be lowered so I can have a trad 6 year old wife like my best bro muhahhmed.
ofc u do, indians are notorious for their flattery.i do this
No, you can say the underage marriages that occur in the Bible belt aren't inherently pedophilic. Also your comparison is wrong since the AOC isn't the same.I didn't say what she did was the same, but child marriage is not inherently pedophilic, this is something you've said yourself. Nor is it bannable to advocate for it now, that is what you've been arguing the past hour. So yes, I'm allowed to post little anime girls and talk about how much I want for the age of consent to be lowered so I can have a trad 6 year old wife like my best bro muhahhmed.
not green therefore u say this>My wife is 6 but I would absolutely never EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER fuck her before she turns 18 I promise
same thingOh wait I thought the title said cord immigrant deleted his account, nvm.
All volker did, was offsite, on his own twitter, follow an account. Sparkles, onsite, actively defended, and said she approved of child marriage, while worshipping a pedophile. So what's up with that? Sparkles gets to literally worship a dead pedophile and follow his teachings like the word of God, but volker doesn't get to put a modern day pedophiles tweets on his for you page without a perma?New precedent has been set. Volker41 and the rest will now be unbanned
Who the fuck cares what the bible belt does? This is about marrying 9 year olds, which is what sparkles defends.No, you can say the underage marriages that occur in the Bible belt aren't inherently pedophilic
no, like cord immigrant deleted himself.same thing
Saying Muhammad's a pedophile is subjective and raises questions I don't know the answer to. Seeing who Volker follows and making a guided inference is objective.All volker did, was offsite, on his own twitter, follow an account. Sparkles, onsite, actively defended, and said she approved of child marriage, while worshipping a pedophile. So what's up with that? Sparkles gets to literally worship a pedophile and follow his teachings like the word of God, but volker doesn't get to put a modern day pedophiles tweets on his for you page without a perma?
Do you think sex is involved when the wife or husband is underage in the Bible belt?Who the fuck cares what the bible belt does? This is about marrying 9 year olds, which is what sparkles defends.