- Joined
- Mar 17, 2024
- Messages
- 5,429
Finally... @baqqrihNo shit bro...
Finally... @baqqrihNo shit bro...
I don't know it. What if it's all just a bunch of jokes? What if none are jokes? How am I supposed to interpret all of this garbage? I hate the results of that vote we did. It's the worst part about moderating this place now, in my opinion. Someone's going to be pissed no matter which way I interpret it, whether it be the person making a "joke" or the person accusing him of not joking. It's all arbitrary and it's all retarded, I'd say, and if I had a choice of the matter, I'd keep things how they were prior to that rule change, to keep things as harsh as they were, so that we wouldn't have issues like this, but people made their choice with that vote, and so this is our result, and this is how things will be. I'm just following your logic of "nuance for jokes" by my interpretation, and that's all you're ever going to get now that we have this crappy policy in place, "interpretation", because that's all that this rule change allows for when we're confronted with iffy comments like that, so don't bicker when you get what you voted for.He isn't joking we all know it.
what is going on?I don't know it. What if it's all just a bunch of jokes? What if none are jokes? How am I supposed to interpret all of this garbage? I hate the results of that vote we did. It's the worst part about moderating this place now, in my opinion. Someone's going to be pissed no matter which way I interpret it, whether it be the person making a "joke" or the person accusing him of not joking. It's all arbitrary and it's all retarded, I'd say, and if I had a choice of the matter, I'd keep things how they were prior to that rule change, to keep things as harsh as they were, so that we wouldn't have issues like this, but people made their choice with that vote, and so this is our result, and this is how things will be. I'm just following your logic of "nuance for jokes" by my interpretation, and that's all you're ever going to get now that we have this crappy policy in place, "interpretation", because that's all that this rule change allows for when we're confronted with iffy comments like that, so don't bicker when you get what you voted for.
HWABAG made an alleged joke about marrying a teenager, X reported him for it, I made the judgement that it was a joke instead of a serious comment, and now we're suffering the consequences of what happens when you have the policy of moderators arbitrarily deciding these things on the whim of their personal notions, of what is and isn't a joke, instead of having enough sense like we once did to simply not tolerate any of these statements whatsoever.what is going on?
I didn't want it, I told Doll to knock it off when he said we should have a vote over whether my jokes should get me banned or not. It's your gut sense. Look at his god damn profile. You are a retard if you can't 'interpret' he's a pedo.I don't know it. What if it's all just a bunch of jokes? What if none are jokes? How am I supposed to interpret all of this garbage? I hate the results of that vote we did. It's the worst part about moderating this place now, in my opinion. Someone's going to be pissed no matter which way I interpret it, whether it be the person making a "joke" or the person accusing him of not joking. It's all arbitrary and it's all retarded, I'd say, and if I had a choice of the matter, I'd keep things how they were prior to that rule change, to keep things as harsh as they were, so that we wouldn't have issues like this, but people made their choice with that vote, and so this is our result, and this is how things will be. I'm just following your logic of "nuance for jokes" by my interpretation, and that's all you're ever going to get now that we have this crappy policy in place, "interpretation", because that's all that this rule change allows for when we're confronted with iffy comments like that, so don't bicker when you get what you voted for.
I didn't want it, I told Doll to knock it off when he said we should have a vote over whether my jokes should get me banned or not. It's your gut sense. Look at his god damn profile. You are a retard if you can't 'interpret' he's a pedi.
HWABAG made an alleged joke about marrying a teenager, X reported him for it, I made the judgement that it was a joke instead of a serious comment, and now we're suffering the consequences of what happens when you have the policy of moderators arbitrarily deciding these things on the whim of their personal notions, of what is and isn't a joke, instead of having enough sense like we once did to simply not tolerate any of these statements whatsoever.
HWABAG's been a problem like this since March. I know I make jokes about soylita. But what if I had soylita set as my pfp and made the same excuses?man @X Immigrant why do you want everybody to be banned, you constantly make pedophilic jokes but whenever somebody else says something stupid you start jumping them and accusing them of being child rapists
tomoko kuyori is initially 15-16 but by the end of the show she is 18HWABAG's been a problem like this since March. I know I make jokes about soylita. But what if I had soylita set as my pfp and made the same excuses?
>she's 3000 years old brotomoko kuyori is initially 15-16 but by the end of the show she is 18
Readidk i read this on the wiki, you should stop accusing everyone of being pedophiles while making these jokes yourself anyways, it seems very hypocritical
I know I make jokes about soylita. But what if I had soylita set as my pfp and made the same excuses?
i mean, her being 18 by the end of the show makes sense to me even doe i never watched it>she's 3000 years old bro
Read
Didn't change what she looked like so your argument is the same as the 3000 years old argument.i mean, her being 18 by the end of the show makes sense to me even doe i never watched it
That doesn't change the validity of what I said?you have made a bunch of fucked up jokes in the past from the screenshots ive seen and judging from a short look at your post history which arent related to soylita at all
booo @X Immigrant kill yourself you unironically defend pedophiles, its all jokes and games until someone brings up maphammed and princess sparkles, you genuinely cant stop cocksucking these niggersi mean, her being 18 by the end of the show makes sense to me even doe i never watched it
you have made a bunch of fucked up jokes in the past from the screenshots ive seen and judging from a short look at your post history which arent related to soylita at all
fine i guess, im not going to derail this thread anymore let baqqrih decideDidn't change what she looked like so your argument is the same as the 3000 years old argument.
That doesn't change the validity of what I said?
I guess we're supposed to take Konata's copypasta as a joke too @baqqrih ? That's why he was banned originally, before the alts.
b-BRAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPP
You are right. I apologize for not having responded earlier to your previous replies. Really, I was too pent up over this stupid "pedophilic joke tolerance" thing that we began a few weeks ago to actually think clearly about an appropriate decision. I will ban him. I was unsure of how harsh I should be now that we have that rule, but I think a good solution is to just continue being harsh by my own judgement until I get stopped.Didn't change what she looked like so your argument is the same as the 3000 years old argument.
That doesn't change the validity of what I said?
I guess we're supposed to take Konata's copypasta as a joke too @baqqrih ? That's why he was banned originally, before the alts.
now that i think about, you're probably rightYou think they're only gooning to/fantasizing about who she is at the end of the series? That seems retarded
Finally dude, this should have been done months ago, make it a permaYou are right. I apologize for not having responded earlier to your previous replies. Really, I was too pent up over this stupid "pedophilic joke tolerance" thing that we began a few weeks ago to actually think clearly about an appropriate decision. I will ban him. I was unsure of how harsh I should be now that we have that rule, but I think a good solution is to just continue being harsh by my own judgement until I get stopped.
make it 1000 years so we can still comment on xer profileFinally dude, this should have been done months ago, make it a perma