TRVKE ALERT

[WoproachKiller]

@Lism @FerdinandDist
When you really think about it, Hindus are superior to south shitalians. When south shitalians began moving to the United States, they were hated by pretty much everyone. Whites, blacks, jews, hell even asians. They were stereotyped as short, brown, smelly, diseased-ridden criminals that should be barred from entering the united states. The only people that considered them white was the pozzed us government that considers nafris and uzbekis as white. The largest lynching in US history was not against blacks or asians, but south shitalians. People even called them “guinneas”, essentially calling them shitskins and mocking the government for considering these subhumans white. In Italy, south shitalians are so despised by northerners that there is an entire separatist movement with the soul purpose of getting as far away from those subhumans as possible. Practically every Italian worth of note, and every Italian olympian came from the North or Central part of the country. Asian immigrants in the past 40 years have made more contributions to the US economy that south shitalians have in the past ~140 years. Compare this to hindus, who have contributed to the US economy more than any shitalian shitskin in the past hundred years. Indians dont really have such a negative portrayal in hollywood, most hatred from them comes from online sources rather than real life. Indians are even seen as smart and intelligent, unlike south shitalians. Most tech industries are led by hindus. The fastest growing group of millionaires in America is hindus. There have been more Indian inventors than south shitalian inventors. India doesn’t have a clear-cut “north/south divide” despite the genetic distance, in fact the south of india is more prosperous than the north. India has a booming economy and population, white shitalians cant breed and have pretty much no economy. Overall, hindus have been more a net gain for any country they migrate too, compared to south shitalians. Hell, indians even have more Aryan admixture than south shitalians, if you want to go from the “whiteness” angle.

So basically we shouldn’t be asking “are italians white?”, rather we should be asking “are italians human?” (they are not).

 

[ILoveCoals]

@Lism @FerdinandDist
When you really think about it, Hindus are superior to south shitalians. When south shitalians began moving to the United States, they were hated by pretty much everyone. Whites, blacks, jews, hell even asians. They were stereotyped as short, brown, smelly, diseased-ridden criminals that should be barred from entering the united states. The only people that considered them white was the pozzed us government that considers nafris and uzbekis as white. The largest lynching in US history was not against blacks or asians, but south shitalians. People even called them “guinneas”, essentially calling them shitskins and mocking the government for considering these subhumans white. In Italy, south shitalians are so despised by northerners that there is an entire separatist movement with the soul purpose of getting as far away from those subhumans as possible. Practically every Italian worth of note, and every Italian olympian came from the North or Central part of the country. Asian immigrants in the past 40 years have made more contributions to the US economy that south shitalians have in the past ~140 years. Compare this to hindus, who have contributed to the US economy more than any shitalian shitskin in the past hundred years. Indians dont really have such a negative portrayal in hollywood, most hatred from them comes from online sources rather than real life. Indians are even seen as smart and intelligent, unlike south shitalians. Most tech industries are led by hindus. The fastest growing group of millionaires in America is hindus. There have been more Indian inventors than south shitalian inventors. India doesn’t have a clear-cut “north/south divide” despite the genetic distance, in fact the south of india is more prosperous than the north. India has a booming economy and population, white shitalians cant breed and have pretty much no economy. Overall, hindus have been more a net gain for any country they migrate too, compared to south shitalians. Hell, indians even have more Aryan admixture than south shitalians, if you want to go from the “whiteness” angle.

So basically we shouldn’t be asking “are italians white?”, rather we should be asking “are italians human?” (they are not).

SHUT THE FUCK UP

 

[Donald]

Obsessed niggerbabble nca

 

[Sagehardt]

keep babbling about

 

[WoproachKiller]

HAMAS_2 AND FETI ARE SHIT@LIAN SHTSKN NIGGERS​

SECTIONALISM IS A FILTHY SHIT@LIAN LOVING RACE TRAITOR​

 

[Brainstorm]

 

[Soygoy]

i didnt read a single word

 

[Lism]

>When you really think about it, Hindus are superior to south shitalians. When south shitalians began moving to the United States, they were hated by pretty much everyone. Whites, blacks, jews, hell even asians. They were stereotyped as short, brown, smelly, diseased-ridden criminals that should be barred from entering the united states. The only people that considered them white was the pozzed us government that considers nafris and uzbekis as white.

The U.S. Government flip-flopped on whether or not MENAs are White, sometimes ruling that they weren't and sometimes ruling that they were. Italians, on the other hand, were never even questioned on the grounds of their whiteness legally which would suggest that popular consensus was that they were White.

>The largest lynching in US history was not against blacks or asians, but south shitalians

Lynchings had nothing to do with race, plenty of White WASPs were lynched and the most common reason for lynching was cattle theft. In this case, the lynchings were under suspicions of mob activity.

>People even called them “guinneas”, essentially calling them shitskins and mocking the government for considering these subhumans white. In Italy, south shitalians are so despised by northerners that there is an entire separatist movement with the soul purpose of getting as far away from those subhumans as possible. Practically every Italian worth of note, and every Italian olympian came from the North or Central part of the country.

Ehh, I'm not going to argue against Northern Italian separatism. Northern Italy is far superior to the South, but Southern Italy is still home to much more innovators than pretty much everywhere outside of Europe. In a country like Italy, brain drain over centuries is only natural. Intelligent people from the rural south moved up to the urban and wealthy north, which may be why Early Modern Northern Italians have rather sporadic genomics. Some of them are Southerly while others are Northerly. Southern Italians are more Greek than Italian I think.

>Asian immigrants in the past 40 years have made more contributions to the US economy that south shitalians have in the past ~140 years. Compare this to hindus, who have contributed to the US economy more than any shitalian shitskin in the past hundred years. Indians dont really have such a negative portrayal in hollywood, most hatred from them comes from online sources rather than real life. Indians are even seen as smart and intelligent, unlike south shitalians. Most tech industries are led by hindus. The fastest growing group of millionaires in America is hindus. There have been more Indian inventors than south shitalian inventors. India doesn’t have a clear-cut “north/south divide” despite the genetic distance, in fact the south of india is more prosperous than the north. India has a booming economy and population, white shitalians cant breed and have pretty much no economy. Overall, hindus have been more a net gain for any country they migrate too, compared to south shitalians. Hell, indians even have more Aryan admixture than south shitalians, if you want to go from the “whiteness” angle.

Indians are successful in America because Indian-Americans are literally the most selected group in human history. Southern Italians in America are also highly successful though compared to other European ethnic groups, because the less successful ones generally returned to Italy (I recall around 1/3-1/2 returned). Despite this, Indians' only hope to not be incel is to have sex with other Indian girls, and even they tend to enjoy having sex with other races. It is very socially acceptable to make fun of Indians in America by pretty much everyone who is not White, and Indians are mostly comic relief characters like Rajesh Koothrapali and the guy from the Simpsons.

You can model Itals as whatever you want in G25 and get decently low distances. Formal software models them as having most of their "eastern" component from Ancient Greeks (Helladic/Minoan ancestry aside from their Steppe component) and less than a fifth from the Middle East. Certainly not ideal, but not as bad as you're saying. https://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/southern-italian-ethnogenesis-my-theory.42655/

Also, only two tribes of Indians are more steppe-rich than Southern Italians, the Jatts and the Ror. Who are extreme outliers and also exceed groups like the Kalash and Pashtuns. Southern Itals are 20-30% Steppe while Indian Brahmins struggle to pass 15% Sintashta, which itself is only around 70% Steppe