paid... negative money. who would work that job then but the very people who want to torture students as a hobby
>all the morally good people not taking a job
This is already the case
>and you wouldn't want to be bad at teaching then if it pays so much, right? thats how corruption in police is solved, if you're paying the police a lot of money and have bite when it comes to firing people, then they won't go risk their job over petty bribes. corruption will still exist sure, but at least they wont be getting paid in power and not money.
No they would still suck
They aren’t bad because of “corruption and bribes”, they are bad because they are retatded and evil. If you increased the pay they would just be retarded, evil, and paid more than they deserve (which is 0 dollars and 0 cents a year)
>trve, but theres no way to standardized test for blue-collar shit, either. how exactly does one determine that i know how to lay bricks via a paper test? i know some high schools are doing vocational training programs and shit but still...
Yeah you would still have to go to in person classes for that shit. But algebra, basic biology, organic chemistry, linear algebra etc, which make up the bulk of the classes the average person takes nowadays, would be much better done via credit by exam.
You would still need some colleges for labs, trades, etc.
>tsmt, this is why i agree with individualized education. if im getting 100's on all my assignments i should be allowed to skip grades and check out of school instead of being forced to study for a test that has less bargaining power at colleges than it did 20 years ago. if i can prove that im smart enough for whatever niggershit course im taking then i should be spending time in courses that will actually help me as a person
Fr it’s so horrible and retarded
I was able to skip a grade in high school, and it was a massive chore since it forced me to take outside courses (since I still needed to credit for certain classes) and it raped my GPA because of the retarded weighing system.
>DO THIS
But I like my corporate goyslop
>well yeah, its basic math and english... until my school spent a good 5 months just grinding in doing the ACT up to taking a full-length practice test at least thrice. then again i got a composite of 30 on the act so maybe doing that worked but... if this is basic math and english, then how come having a school that ground it nonstop had significant effects? how come we needed an entire half-year dedicated to straight "ACT prep"? how come it was based on learning it specifically for the test and not through absorbing the math and reading from all the courses taken over a decade? either way, im certain that the time spent on solely grinding the ACT was time stolen from stuff that would've had greater long-term benefit to learn, surely.
What jartycuck school did you go to? I’ve never taken the ACT, only the SAT, and my school didn’t “train me” for it because that’s retarded and it’s not it’s place. You’re supposed to study for the exam on your own time, and judge how much time to spend studying/preparing based on your own performance and goals. Your school is retarded. This is why public high schools should be abolished.
But I did spend more time studying for the SAT than I should have; time that would have been better suited elsewhere. However, this is nowhere near the amount of time I have wasted on homework in just ONE English class. Also, I chose to spend that amount of time, whereas my English class FORCED me to spend so much time doing niggerslop homework
>as far as i know when college apps want extracurriculars they want to see volunteer work- which im pretty sure volunteer work is based more on where you live than who you know. i lived in a volunteer hour desert so only place that accepted volunteers consistently was the animal shelter up until i found something that let me get hundreds of volunteer hours online by leaving the client on so i could theoretically tutor sudents that never came...
I did online tutoring too. What a waste of time that was, even more than the amount of time I spent studying for the SAT. Anyhow extracurriculars aren’t just volunteering, they can range from school clubs to awards to personal projects to research.
>i wouldn't know how to make it more fair, standardized testing is far from fair, but neither are grades and getting letters of recommendation relies on being buddy-buddy with a teacher which may not be easy. but i like the system where colleges forego considering test scores and GPA nearly as much, and instead focus on the essay you shit out to apply to them and your "circumstances" - some risk for bias here but at least your education career doesn't risk being ruined because you went to a poor inner-city school and all the teachers were out to get you or something
If we made it so that you could only take the SAT once it would be pretty fair. Not perfectly fair, of course, but a million times fairer than considering your “circumstances”, which depend on the circumstances you were born in rather than what you actually accomplished. Unlike your GPA your teacher being a nigger doesn’t rape your chances of getting a high SAT score.
>its funny to me how school shootings still remain the easiest target of all time for suicidal edgy tweens. they put up all this security theater shit, got the metal scanners
My school installed metal detectors and made us wait in line in the hot son to go through it. What a waste of money. That could have spent that money building up a new education system that didn’t require high schools
>its not the school system in general but the children inside them that causes people to become violen
In my experience the students have been chill and the teachers are the problem. Though I imagine if you go to a school with a lot of blacks or poors the students would probably be insufferable