VOTE! Should nuance be shown to rule breaking content?

[DOLL]

Several incidents have occurred on the blog where a user will imply they have an attraction to underage youth. This could be through simping for some anime chick and, surprise, she is depicted as being underage. Or it could be through gigaquoting that you end up implying pedophilia is a good thing while making a joke, ex. Gigaquoting a jarty-tier post. This has caused some users to toe the line, as the jannies know to give long term users the benefit of the doubt as people could be potentially making a joke. Should this practice continue, or should janny strive to remove this issue completely by issuing Rule 2 bans for posts praising pedophilia?

 

[I HATE NIGGERS]

no, porn jokes are not funny and are inherently niggerish

 

[Starbing_Artiste]

maybe there should be a strike system or something

 

[Donald]

Regardless, ban HWABAG because I don't like xim.

 

[Zondien]

I think it depends on what type of joke it is. If it's a "joke" sexualising real kids it should 100 percent be banned whether you were being "ironic" or not

 

[Soynic Hedgehog]

Very obvious easy answer here. Delete this thread and just go on a case by case basis with everyone.
Publicly deciding either way will cause problems. Saying its officially a nuanced issue will encourage people to push boundaries. Saying you are going to from now on go scorched earth on anything that could be interpreted that way will just make people obsessively paranoid and trying to be extra safe with whatever they say, which easy to recognize people doing and leads to niggers like Terrycrews trying to abuse it and causing chaos.

 

[Slvt4BIBISI]

no, porn jokes are not funny and are inherently niggerish

It’s not coomer jokes it’s stuff like diddy, Epstein or >And then we’ll goon to ‘p o algo.

 

[X Immigrant]

Nuance doesn't mean giving the benefit of the doubt all the time @DOLL (95%) .

Very obvious easy answer here. Delete this thread and just go on a case by case basis with everyone.
Publicly deciding either way will cause problems. Saying its officially a nuanced issue will encourage people to push boundaries. Saying you are going to from now on go scorched earth on anything that could be interpreted that way will just make people obsessively paranoid and trying to be extra safe with whatever they say, which easy to recognize people doing and leads to niggers like Terrycrews trying to abuse it and causing chaos.

This guy's got it. Quit being a kike and admit HWABAG deserves a ban, just like princessparkles does.

 

[soyjack]

I think most people understands that's it's a joke but some folx might think that we're pro pedo
Even so I think that a few jokes here and there aren't harmful
just ban anyone being an explicit pedo

Also a lot of people here are 16, 17
being attracted to characters their age isn't weird
I think

 

[Zondien]

Very obvious easy answer here. Delete this thread and just go on a case by case basis with everyone.
Publicly deciding either way will cause problems.

The same happened with the "ban degeneracy" rule. Innocent people got banned for no reason while much bigger fags like donuthole still got off free. I agree it should be a case by case basis

 

[I HATE NIGGERS]

additionally we should ban anyone who supports niggers, since niggers are inherently pedophile rapists

 

[Donald]

Why the fuck isn't DonutHole banned yet?

 

[Stephen]

HWABAG was a hero like George Floyd or whatever
Anyways I’ve made pedo jokes, one even got the little yellow banner over my post which was hilarious. Total Rulecuck Death.

 

[Soyteen Liker]

This could be through simping for some anime chick and, surprise, she is depicted as being underage.

I would say stuff like this should get a pass if it's not clear that the character is underage, I remember Aedra a while back banned anthony for simping over Nepeta from Homestuck who is 13 at the beginning and legal at the end of the series, it can definitely be ambiguous.

It reminds me of the "rape spectrum" image, we'd need examples and draw a line for no punishment, warning, temp ban, and perm ban.

https://files.catbox.moe/9tzqaa.png

 

[HWABAG]

warning system is working well lole

 

[I HATE NIGGERS]

I would say stuff like this should get a pass if it's not clear that the character is underage, I remember Aedra a while back banned anthony for simping over Nepeta from Homestuck who is 13 at the beginning and legal at the end of the series, it can definitely be ambiguous.

It reminds me of the "rape spectrum" image, we'd need examples and draw a line for no punishment, warning, temp ban, and perm ban.

https://files.catbox.moe/9tzqaa.png

how is it a spectrum? either you're a pedophile or not

 

[DOLL]

Very obvious easy answer here. Delete this thread and just go on a case by case basis with everyone.
Publicly deciding either way will cause problems. Saying its officially a nuanced issue will encourage people to push boundaries. Saying you are going to from now on go scorched earth on anything that could be interpreted that way will just make people obsessively paranoid and trying to be extra safe with whatever they say, which easy to recognize people doing and leads to niggers like Terrycrews trying to abuse it and causing chaos.

The discussion is more important than the solution. It is good for you guys to have an idea of what I am going to do and for the users to have a say in how things are done around here. I don't want to train our jannies into hammering as many people as possible like on other sites, but I also have to teach baqq and others to take charge of these situations when they occur in case I am gone that day.

 

[Stephen]

Why the fuck isn't DonutHole banned yet?

NiggerHole doesnt go beyond the line. What justice is there if a user gets banned for one pedo joke when ‘Hole makes a trillion fagshit posts and stays?

 

[Slvt4BIBISI]

Also a lot of people here are 16, 17
being attracted to characters their age isn't weird
I think

No tolerance is best tho as a would be pedo can just lie and say their 17.99.

 

[X Immigrant]

NiggerHole doesnt go beyond the line. What justice is there if a user gets banned for one pedo joke when ‘Hole makes a trillion fagshit posts and stays?

Because said user's constantly defending their pedophile manga, and then gigaquotes people attacking it.

Say, didn't @DOLL (95%) bully the fuck out of @THE JOBBER OF THE SCHLOG for liking Oneshot? Why not do the same for IWABAP liking Tomoko?