Rule Two Vote: Age Restrictions and Janny Nuance

Which system would you prefer?


  • Total voters
    75
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

baqqrih

Well-known shlogga
🏅
Joined
Mar 5, 2024
Messages
7,550
Now that we've had time to experiment with either system of judgement, which would you prefer for the future of the site?
 
Now that we've had time to experiment with either system of judgement, which would you prefer for the future of the site?
If the previous system theorically wins would the currently banned users that are banned for being 16 and older get unbanned?
 
I never liked that the site was now 18+, it also sets a bad example when the only reason it is is because of stuff like this. The rest of the soysphere is 16+ and stuff like this leads to people avoiding the shlog because of "Isn't that the pedo namefagging site?"
 
If the previous system theorically wins would the currently banned users that are banned for being 16 and older get unbanned?
Yes, users who were banned for being under eighteen who made accounts after the rule was made in December would have their bans lifted, as long as they're still over sixteen.
 
I never liked that the site was now 18+, it also sets a bad example when the only reason it is is because of stuff like this. The rest of the soysphere is 16+ and stuff like this leads to people avoiding the shlog because of "Isn't that the pedo namefagging site?"
I think I'm okay with retarded people staying away from the site.
 
Dude, if we're trying to keep retards away from the site, we might start with the people joking about sex with children. I don't think either of us have a place to speak about teenagers being the retarded ones when you and I are both sixteen.
I was referring to the part about people avoiding the schlog because it's "that pedo namefagging site".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top