• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

My classmates in this shitty sociology-tier class are presenting shit about movies they watched

They are giving in-depth reviews on their films, and I am obligated to write notes on each review, so in order to avoid being ultra bored, I will publish them here
I need to submit this though, so no unwholesome language
something gemmy incoming
 
Presenter: Victoria
Topic: Colours in Film
Film: La La Land
-Explains the plot of the film, a couple in Hollywood becoming artists
-Explains the origin and awards of the film, director etc.
-In-depth character explanation, Mia and Sebastian are main characters.
-Explains how each character is associated with a colour, Mia is red, Sebastian is Blue, this is prominent in romantic moments
-Gives more examples of scenes where this is represented
-States that Green is the colour theme of discourse between the main characters

(Obese chick wastes 5 minutes of my life bullshitting, making several mistakes throughout)
 
Presenter: Victoria
Topic: Colours in Film
Film: La La Land
-Explains the plot of the film, a couple in Hollywood becoming artists
-Explains the origin and awards of the film, director etc.
-In-depth character explanation, Mia and Sebastian are main characters.
-Explains how each character is associated with a colour, Mia is red, Sebastian is Blue, this is prominent in romantic moments
-Gives more examples of scenes where this is represented

(Obese chick wastes 5 minutes of my life bullshitting, making several mistakes throughout)
what a shit movie did she chose that shit?
 
Presenter: Charly
Topic: Comparison of Lion King cartoon vs live action remake
Film: The Lion King
-Will focus on main differences
-Explains how the "live action" film is actually CGI and not real.
-Highlights differences in animation style and the design style of the characters
-States that she thinks the realism of the remake is a weakness and not a positive
-Reasoning being that facial expressions are hard to create for real animals
-Explaining differences in the personalities of the characters
-Scar was more backhanded before, more intimidating now
-The goofy-looking hyena cannot be represented well with realistic animation
-The bird has become more annoying
-They made the hyenas less funny
-Explains difference in songs

(Dyke with annoying voice, decent presentation dough)
 
Presenter: Charly
Topic: Comparison of Lion King cartoon vs live action remake
Film: The Lion King
-Will focus on main differences
-Explains how the "live action" film is actually CGI and not real.
-Highlights differences in animation style and the design style of the characters
-States that she thinks the realism of the remake is a weakness and not a positive
-Reasoning being that facial expressions are hard to create for real animals
-Explaining differences in the personalities of the characters
-Scar was more backhanded before, more intimidating now
-The goofy-looking hyena cannot be represented well with realistic animation
-The bird has become more annoying
-They made the hyenas less funny
-Explains difference in songs

(Dyke with annoying voice, decent presentation dough)
really soyish theme for a presentation
 
Presenter: Alexander
Topic: Comparison of The thing 1951 vs 1982 remake
Film: The Thing
-Communicates the plot of both films, there are only a few similarities
-Notes the origin of each film
-Explains in great depth, specific parts of the films which carry similarities
-States the themes of the films, Distrust and Claustrophobia, especially distrust
-Complains how the majority of the cast are "white men", Goes onto criticise the lack of representation

(This is so SNCA I don't care to continue listening, brain hurty, he stuttered and twitched a lot due to being an autist)
 
Presenter: Alexander
Topic: Comparison of The thing 1951 vs 1982 remake
Film: The Thing
-Communicates the plot of both films, there are only a few similarities
-Notes the origin of each film
-Explains in great depth, specific parts of the films which carry similarities
-States the themes of the films, Distrust and Claustrophobia, especially distrust
-Complains how the majority of the cast are "white men", Goes onto criticise the lack of representation

(This is so SNCA I don't care to continue listening, brain hurty, he stuttered and twitched a lot due to being an autist)
the thing is kino thoughbeit yeah nigga of course it's gonna be white niggas because the film is set in antartica and only scientist niggas be goin there and scientist niggas be white as hell
 
Presenter: Alexander
Topic: Comparison of The thing 1951 vs 1982 remake
Film: The Thing
-Communicates the plot of both films, there are only a few similarities
-Notes the origin of each film
-Explains in great depth, specific parts of the films which carry similarities
-States the themes of the films, Distrust and Claustrophobia, especially distrust
-Complains how the majority of the cast are "white men", Goes onto criticise the lack of representation

(This is so SNCA I don't care to continue listening, brain hurty, he stuttered and twitched a lot due to being an autist)
bba4fd4d271e9e17c8a4e4c2fc8258b3aaeb27470621b73ad977e2e98633456f_1.jpg

Found xim
 
Presenter: Sahil
Topic: Why Ratatouille should be considered a great film
Film: Ratatouille
-Takes a long time explaining the plot of this film
-Explains the themes of the film
-The theme which he claims is why the film is so enjoyable is "Anyone Can Cook"
-Explains how the main character Remy, despite being a rat, has talents
-Uses this to connect to a quality of inspiring the audience
-Explains how the female chef character "breaks the patriarchy" due to her aggressive nature
-Spends a great deal of time hyperfocusing on this detail
(This guy is an afghan faggot and I had to listen to the whole presentation in his faggot accent)
 
Back
Top