Most pointless war in history

You can't be serious. Greek food is both clearly inferior to Italian food and also clearly less authentically Greek, as many of it was introduced by the Tourks and their cronies.
clitalian cope

gordon ramsay says otherwise.
 
clitalian cope

gordon ramsay says otherwise.
Who the fuck cares what Gordon Ramsay thinks? Have you ever heard of any great greek chefs? No, but many famous chefs are Italian. Or some other West Romance language like French or Spanish. Greeks can run diners and that's about it. Greek food is seen like street food in the west, not sophisticated. Italians make the best street food but also the best fine dining
 
both of the world wars as it was a jewish ploy to further accelerate humanity into degeneracy and leading to the kali yuga as evola mentioned.
 
Not at all!

Although the Italians did have a saying that the Greeks were almost as bad as the Jews.
Italians calling Greeks Jews is like Indians calling Pakistanis pajeets.

And tell me how it wasn't a success for the grubby little Italian (((merchants))) in Venice, and them only?
 
Italians calling Greeks Jews is like Indians calling Pakistanis pajeets.

And tell me how it wasn't a success for the grubby little Italian (((merchants))) in Venice, and them only?
Nothing Jewish about being a merchant, Jews just happen to be quite good at it. It is an Chinese thing to view merchants as lowly, in Western civilization they always held a good deal of respect as Europe is a peninsular continent.
 
Nothing Jewish about being a merchant, Jews just happen to be quite good at it. It is an Chinese thing to view merchants as lowly, in Western civilization they always held a good deal of respect as Europe is a peninsular continent.
The Venetians were always charging high travel fees in the Mediterranean. They had Jewish ancestry(all Shitalians do) charged high prices for their goods, made Christians attack other Christians, what wasn't Jewish about them?
 
Last edited:
The Venetians were always charging high travel fees in the Mediterranean. They had Jewish ancestry(all Shitalians do) charged high prices for their goods, made Christians attack other Christians, what wasn't Jewish about them?
Venetians are entirely of WHG, EEF, and Steppe ancestry. Only Central and South Italians have extra Iran/CHG ancestry. Meanwhile all Greeks have extra Iran/CHG ancestry.

The Byzantines started it. The Byzantines actually did much worse -- they sided with Saladin against the Christian crusaders for petty political reasons, and also they massacred Italians in the city of Constantinople.
 
Venetians are entirely of WHG, EEF, and Steppe ancestry. Only Central and South Italians have extra Iran/CHG ancestry. Meanwhile all Greeks have extra Iran/CHG ancestry.
Proof?
The Byzantines started it. The Byzantines actually did much worse -- they sided with Saladin
When?
against the Christian crusaders for petty political reasons, and also they massacred Italians in the city of Constantinople.
They massacred the (((merchants))) for being Jews

These crusaders caused a cultural massacre much worse than the Germanics did to the Romans, not to mention they attacked a Catholic town as well.
 
Proof?

When?

They massacred the (((merchants))) for being Jews

These crusaders caused a cultural massacre much worse than the Germanics did to the Romans, not to mention they attacked a Catholic town as well.
1.
1731642208892.png

1731642288533.png


2. Second crusade
3. They did not.

The crusaders destroyed a decadent, miscegenated empire which had repeatedly denigrated and backstabbed Catholics after Catholics had saved them from their own failures against the Seljuks
 
Jews were merchants. Simple as.
https://brill.com/previewpdf/display/book/edcoll/9789004376717/BP000011.xml
2. Second crusade
This was after the schism.

Also:
"Like Saladin, the Byzantines had much to fear from
the West, and talk of crusades stirred unhappy memories of their experiences
with earlier ones"
3. They did not.
The crusaders destroyed a decadent, miscegenated empire
No, the cucktholics were just a shitty amalgamation of city-states with kings that amounted to nothing, led by the (((Venetians))) and a fake leader, and who were just jealous.
which had repeatedly denigrated and backstabbed Catholics after Catholics had saved them from their own failures against the Seljuks
"Crusader assistance to the Byzantine Empire was mixed with treachery and looting"
 
1. View attachment 70407
View attachment 70408

2. Second crusade
3. They did not.

The crusaders destroyed a decadent, miscegenated empire which had repeatedly denigrated and backstabbed Catholics after Catholics had saved them from their own failures against the Seljuks
Jews were merchants. Simple as.
https://brill.com/previewpdf/display/book/edcoll/9789004376717/BP000011.xml

This was after the schism.

Also:
"Like Saladin, the Byzantines had much to fear from
the West, and talk of crusades stirred unhappy memories of their experiences
with earlier ones"


No, the cucktholics were just a shitty amalgamation of city-states with kings that amounted to nothing, led by the (((Venetians))) and a fake leader, and who were just jealous.

"Crusader assistance to the Byzantine Empire was mixed with treachery and looting"
Quit fighting. Latins and Hellenes are friends.
1731808367236.png
 
Back
Top