- Joined
- Jun 30, 2024
- Messages
- 448
What up Chuds, and welcome back to Chudology 101. Today we’re gonna talk about the only man we have been taught to hate since birth with the fury of a thousand suns. While his actions were reprehensible, who he was or what he did don’t really matter.
Paradoxically, modern followers of the Austrian painter would themselves have been at best shunned and at worst placed in a camp themselves. This contradiction can be directly observed by accurately checking the demographics of neon yahtzees online. It is confirmed that a not insignificant portion of these people actually have black, brown or Jewish ancestry.
So, let’s take a look at the intersection between Chudology and policy to see what exactly has caused such an increase in support for the father of Fanta, Volkswagen and Porsche.
When it comes to anyone’s ideological journey, there are push factors and pull factors. The political awakenings of many (WESTERN) Chuds will almost always begin with shame and disgust.
Being a Chud is a trait that many look down upon. For better or for worse, the mental image many people have of a Chud is that of a hunchbacked political extremist who wants to commit mass atrocities as revenge for not having good people skills.
As such, anyone associated with Chuddiness is shamed. Now, this wouldn’t necessarily be a problem in and of itself. There needs to be some level of shame in society. We should shame pedophiles, shitlibs and whatever Michael Moore is, but this isn’t a good cause.
When the same group of people who are shaming you for embracing who you are are the ones who proselytize transgenderism to preschoolers, endorses political violence against the right, sides with black murderers over white victims, and does everything that it can to dehumanize you; we need to delve a little deeper.
This goes into one of the defining traits of the Chud: self-awareness. Chuds have a unique immunity to cognitive dissonance that makes them very difficult to influence.
This manifests itself in the fact that very few Chuds ever become pro-establishment over time. To put it simply, the Chud is too wise. You simply cannot convince him that the powers that be are his moral superiors and that he should accept their teachings.
So, now that the Chuds are sufficiently alienated from the mainstream, they effectively become social nomads looking for a land to call their own. This is where the soysphere comes in. Despite its political leaning, the Soyim are a nation of immigrants.
Ever since the expulsion from the Quay, the Chuds have grown in number and have thrived due to a constant influx of new people, some of whom may not get it at first but will soon learn how to create gems. Even if you hate that there are a large amount of refugees from foreign media platforms, they are here for the same reason you are here: they are looking for a haven to regroup and fight alongside you against the establishment.
This sense of community, an unironic safe space for the Chuds, is the pull factor that brings so many people into the Chud nation and adopt the Chud identity as their own for better or for worse.
But let’s go back to the billion dollar question. Why is it that the Chuds love the Fuhrer? Well, for us to answer that question, we must first answer another question. What is the ultimate evil to the Church of liberalism?
The Christians have the antichrist, a deceiver who leads people astray; which perfectly contradicts the fundamental Christian virtues of truth, honesty and piety.
The Muslims have the Dajjal, who is pretty much a carbon copy of the antichrist.
The Buddhists have Mara, a creature that obstructs enlightenment by tethering us to our worldly vices.
Now, I could go on, but I think that’s enough examples. I’d argue that the liberal antichrist is none other than Adolf Hitler.
And in an ultimate display of defiance, the Chud stands up proudly and proclaims “I would rather be Hitler than you.”
And the world goes quiet. The people around him whisper among each other “is he serious?” “Hitler? Did I hear that right?” “No fucking way he just said that”
And as the crowd’s murmurs quiet down, the Chud speaks.
Hitler hasn’t gotten me fired, Hitler hasn’t doxxed me, Hitler hasn’t banned me off of social media, nor has he sent me death threats, nor has he excused violence against me, nor has he attempted to kill people who share my beliefs. But you know who did? The establishment.
Now, many of the people here are probably going to be angry, after all, we have been told since birth that Hitler is a bad guy and he’s a bad guy because he gassed 6 million Jews or something. But, if you’re fuming over this, you’re missing the point.
Chuds are not the problem, they are a symptom of the asinine leadership of the international liberal class that has governed the western world since at the very least 1945 and potentially as early as the Wilson administration if you view him as part of it.
The truth is that there will be more Chuds. If you nuked the Sharty, five new websites would pop up and the attention of such an event would in and of itself hurt your cause. What we need is to liberate ourselves from the shackles of international liberalism and create a better society for everyone, not just obsequious shitlib retirees who pulled the ladder up in the 1980s and now demand that we financially support them.
And with that, Professor Cobson, out.
Paradoxically, modern followers of the Austrian painter would themselves have been at best shunned and at worst placed in a camp themselves. This contradiction can be directly observed by accurately checking the demographics of neon yahtzees online. It is confirmed that a not insignificant portion of these people actually have black, brown or Jewish ancestry.
So, let’s take a look at the intersection between Chudology and policy to see what exactly has caused such an increase in support for the father of Fanta, Volkswagen and Porsche.
When it comes to anyone’s ideological journey, there are push factors and pull factors. The political awakenings of many (WESTERN) Chuds will almost always begin with shame and disgust.
Being a Chud is a trait that many look down upon. For better or for worse, the mental image many people have of a Chud is that of a hunchbacked political extremist who wants to commit mass atrocities as revenge for not having good people skills.
As such, anyone associated with Chuddiness is shamed. Now, this wouldn’t necessarily be a problem in and of itself. There needs to be some level of shame in society. We should shame pedophiles, shitlibs and whatever Michael Moore is, but this isn’t a good cause.
When the same group of people who are shaming you for embracing who you are are the ones who proselytize transgenderism to preschoolers, endorses political violence against the right, sides with black murderers over white victims, and does everything that it can to dehumanize you; we need to delve a little deeper.
This goes into one of the defining traits of the Chud: self-awareness. Chuds have a unique immunity to cognitive dissonance that makes them very difficult to influence.
This manifests itself in the fact that very few Chuds ever become pro-establishment over time. To put it simply, the Chud is too wise. You simply cannot convince him that the powers that be are his moral superiors and that he should accept their teachings.
So, now that the Chuds are sufficiently alienated from the mainstream, they effectively become social nomads looking for a land to call their own. This is where the soysphere comes in. Despite its political leaning, the Soyim are a nation of immigrants.
Ever since the expulsion from the Quay, the Chuds have grown in number and have thrived due to a constant influx of new people, some of whom may not get it at first but will soon learn how to create gems. Even if you hate that there are a large amount of refugees from foreign media platforms, they are here for the same reason you are here: they are looking for a haven to regroup and fight alongside you against the establishment.
This sense of community, an unironic safe space for the Chuds, is the pull factor that brings so many people into the Chud nation and adopt the Chud identity as their own for better or for worse.
But let’s go back to the billion dollar question. Why is it that the Chuds love the Fuhrer? Well, for us to answer that question, we must first answer another question. What is the ultimate evil to the Church of liberalism?
The Christians have the antichrist, a deceiver who leads people astray; which perfectly contradicts the fundamental Christian virtues of truth, honesty and piety.
The Muslims have the Dajjal, who is pretty much a carbon copy of the antichrist.
The Buddhists have Mara, a creature that obstructs enlightenment by tethering us to our worldly vices.
Now, I could go on, but I think that’s enough examples. I’d argue that the liberal antichrist is none other than Adolf Hitler.
And in an ultimate display of defiance, the Chud stands up proudly and proclaims “I would rather be Hitler than you.”
And the world goes quiet. The people around him whisper among each other “is he serious?” “Hitler? Did I hear that right?” “No fucking way he just said that”
And as the crowd’s murmurs quiet down, the Chud speaks.
Hitler hasn’t gotten me fired, Hitler hasn’t doxxed me, Hitler hasn’t banned me off of social media, nor has he sent me death threats, nor has he excused violence against me, nor has he attempted to kill people who share my beliefs. But you know who did? The establishment.
Now, many of the people here are probably going to be angry, after all, we have been told since birth that Hitler is a bad guy and he’s a bad guy because he gassed 6 million Jews or something. But, if you’re fuming over this, you’re missing the point.
Chuds are not the problem, they are a symptom of the asinine leadership of the international liberal class that has governed the western world since at the very least 1945 and potentially as early as the Wilson administration if you view him as part of it.
The truth is that there will be more Chuds. If you nuked the Sharty, five new websites would pop up and the attention of such an event would in and of itself hurt your cause. What we need is to liberate ourselves from the shackles of international liberalism and create a better society for everyone, not just obsequious shitlib retirees who pulled the ladder up in the 1980s and now demand that we financially support them.
And with that, Professor Cobson, out.
