To first look at Tertullian's word about the origin of sin in women:
>The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age; the guilt must of necessity live too. You are the devil's gateway: you are the unsealer of that forbidden tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack. You destroyed so easily God's image, man. On account of your desert----that is, death----even the Son of God had to die. And do you think about adorning yourself over and above your tunics of skins [as in reference to immodest female fashion]?
So, think of it in this gaze, then. You have a disobeyer to God, already unwise in the mind, with a prideful, pretentious costume of full confidence in their disobedience (which this falser [noun] wears in lavishness, perhaps even also in a literal sense of contemporary female fashion) sold to this rebellious woman by the sinful world (most usually, in this instance, the West) rejecting marriage in favor of passion towards a mirror of her disobedience, another wretched witch, and then adopting the prominent sins of the rejected sex into their lives in order to forge a relation that can limitedly function for some time, before it then crumbles by the same sense of delusion that also crumbles the lives of transvestites or male homosexuals into a similar state of being consumed by horrific, violent or deathly consequences (or all listed), like the wrath observed in female homosexual relations.
Where does this peculiar, abominable practice originate, then? Well, you can rather sum it up to the simple term of "sin" (an explanation that is absolutely true, but that is unsatisfactory to the usual human curiosity), or, hopefully, you can comprehend it well-enough with the summary that I've written above, of the factors that construct these detestable actions.
my bad unc
