What evidence? Your document basically just denies your own religious texts and then claims that she's 19 because She just IS, OKAY?!
Write your actual arguments on the blog, don't link me a random pdf with no context/evidence.
I'm not going on a wild goose chase to find out your arguments.
Besides, even if she was a few years older, the fact that a major Islamic document could say that and not either be thrown out, or make you guys question your beliefs just shows that it was not a big deal to marry a child in Islamic culture, and still isn't, unless you need to own Christian chuds.
Again you keep linking the google doc but all it says is "there isn't any evidence besides the Hadith and the Hadith is wrong so he's actually 19 and not 9"
BTW most sources say she could be as old as 15-16, which is the youngest possible age for Mary so you should argue that instead of...
No she wasn't, not a single Islamic historian said this (regardless of what race or religion they were) before the 1960/70s. While you can argue what age she was exactly, almost everyone knows he was underage.