Here. Some posts/threads seem to have been deleted and so I'm restricted in what I can give you
>TSMT reacted a post that got a separate person banned for rule two (thread was regarding the age of consent, post said "why would you post this here? you know there are antis [referring to...
No. I just want to ensure that this place doesn't become some crummy heckhole of jartycucks who get unbanned on a whim because some folk can't do an ounce of their own searching on why some users were originally banned by the previous administration, and so they heedlessly lift bans until their...
Very few people out of the original ban list will actually get unbanned on here. ILoveCoals was re-banned, as any sensible person would expect. Moon is the only staff member who has been trying to do this weird mass unban stuff.
No, I'm going to do so as well.
A merge was discussed but we decided to keep the two separate while maintaining good relations. We're going to try and help each other out with inter-site issues (moderation, maybe some technical feature stuff).
Ah, my mistake, then. I was the guy who temporarily banned him when he first broke the rule, then Steve banned him permanently after a separate offense. Nothing changes from that exceptfor the fact that you aren't even addressing his unban. "Except you didn't do this, teehee." Yeah, that's the...
Yeah, and if he was driving the train off of a bridge, you're reversing it so far on the track that it's now about to crash right into the station. You might start improving your plan a bit by RE-BANNING THOSE WHO BROKE THE PEDOPHILE RULE like ILOVECOALS, A GUY THAT I BANNED when I WAS...