- Joined
- Apr 22, 2024
- Messages
- 11,330
I aint reading allatMy response to Rot's message in my latest post
I'll be leaving for a bit

I aint reading allatMy response to Rot's message in my latest post
I'll be leaving for a bit
yeahis that gabe newell?
Bluddington made a twitlonger for soyjak dramaMy response to Rot's message in my latest post
I'll be leaving for a bit
>My response to Rot's message in my latest post
I'll be leaving for a bit
>https://pomf2.lain.la/f/y03f2yd.jpg
Is this image that bad? I'd say that it's a questionable image since the chest area is very exposed.@entiral please explain this. Why did you draw a kid in a suggestive position? You cant say just a "small body" since coallig characters are high schoolers and one of the tags on your post said "kid"
View attachment 185078
>Why did you draw a kid in a suggestive position?@entiral please explain this. Why did you draw a kid in a suggestive position? You cant say just a "small body" since coallig characters are high schoolers and one of the tags on your post said "kid"
View attachment 185078
Just pull the trigger gng>Why did you draw a kid in a suggestive position?
I already explained in my response, I did not think it looked suggestive until someone mentioned it to me on the Zarty, to which I clarified that I just took a random pose from Google images. Could I have gotten a better pose? Of course, I'll be more careful with what poses I give the characters next time.
>Kid tag
Also explained in my response, I draw them as kids because I have a paternal love for the characters, as oppose to the people you'd mainly see who are waifufags, for this reason I think the image is more adorable than anything, but I completely understand why other people would find it suggestive.
It's mostly suggestive and weird, but there could be a non-sexual perspective to it. It all depends on the intent. But it definitely is more sexual and weird than innocent, considering its ongezellig, which is brimstone sexualization of high schoolers.Is this image that bad? I'd say that it's a questionable image since the chest area is very exposed.
We will never be able to look at someone's mind. So we will never know the true intent of this drawing. But to look from the most optimistic perspective, this could have been an innocent drawing with an adorable intent rather than a pedophilic one. I don't think entiral has the background of the typical 'cord pedo. So entiral could have just made a stupid mistake without thinking much about what he was drawing. In my opinion, entiral doesn't fit the pedo image, so I guess forgive him and make sure he never makes such a mistake again.I already explained in my response, I did not think it looked suggestive until someone mentioned it to me on the Zarty, to which I clarified that I just took a random pose from Google images. Could I have gotten a better pose? Of course, I'll be more careful with what poses I give the characters next time.
>drawing of kid>Kid tag
Also explained in my response, I draw them as kids because I have a paternal love for the characters, as oppose to the people you'd mainly see who are waifufags, for this reason I think the image is more adorable than anything, but I completely understand why other people would find it suggestive.
@telnet ban this pedophile already>Why did you draw a kid in a suggestive position?
I already explained in my response, I did not think it looked suggestive until someone mentioned it to me on the Zarty, to which I clarified that I just took a random pose from Google images. Could I have gotten a better pose? Of course, I'll be more careful with what poses I give the characters next time.
>Kid tag
Also explained in my response, I draw them as kids because I have a paternal love for the characters, as oppose to the people you'd mainly see who are waifufags, for this reason I think the image is more adorable than anything, but I completely understand why other people would find it suggestive.
Ngl I never thought of it as sexual, I've always just found the characters as charming and relatable but I guess you're somewhat right.It's mostly suggestive and weird, but there could be a non-sexual perspective to it. It all depends on the intent. But it definitely is more sexual and weird than innocent, considering its ongezellig, which is brimstone sexualization of high schoolers
The zarty quite literally has all the rules to fight against it turning into a 'p site. The Zarty's booru was literally made because the official one allowed ongezellig 'p (which has now been deleted but was still up in there for a long time).>drawing of kid
>ongezellig( a sexualization tranime of high schoolers)
>on a tranime imageboard booru (breeding ground for brimstone such as loli and 'p)
Ngl I never thought of it as sexual, I've always just found the characters as charming and relatable but I guess you're somewhat right.
The zarty quite literally has all the rules to fight against it turning into a 'p site. The Zarty's booru was literally made because the official one allowed ongezellig 'p (which has now been deleted but was still up in there for a long time).
Ngl I never thought of it as sexual, I've always just found the characters as charming and relatable but I guess you're somewhat right.
The thing is, ongezellig and anything related to it have a horrible reputation. Even if the zarty itself prohibits pedophilia, 'zellig watchers are usually vantablack 'cordpedos. And 'zellig fan art is usually sexualized brimstone bordering on loli. Even the show itself has sexualizations of high schoolers(animated by 'cordtroons).The zarty quite literally has all the rules to fight against it turning into a 'p site. The Zarty's booru was literally made because the official one allowed ongezellig 'p (which has now been deleted but was still up in there for a long time).