• Happy pride month, xisters of the schlog!

BRING MONARCHY BACK

Post thread
DonutHole

DonutHole

Grand Sage of Purrk
Shitposter Latinx Gooner
Joined
Jun 27, 2024
Messages
8,368
Monarchism is the system that God wants for us. The divine right of the nobility, and the king must be upheld. Anything else is evil and against God's will.

The new nobility should be the business owners and shareholders of today. Making a neo-feudal system. These new nobles will be better since they will actually care about their fiefdoms. This is because it will be their property and they have direct interest into maintaining and improving it. They would be raised to rule.
 
DonutHole said:
Monarchism is the system that God wants for us. The divine right of the nobility, and the king must be upheld. Anything else is evil and against God's will.

The new nobility should be the business owners and shareholders of today. Making a neo-feudal system. These new nobles will be better since they will actually care about their fiefdoms. This is because it will be their property and they have direct interest into maintaining and improving it. They would be raised to rule.
Click to expand...
didn't read, sisa posted
 
It isn't divinity or being chosen. This is just what those families believed at that time, and as a result they came to the conclusion that inbreeding would keep their blood "holy" and "pure".

King Charles II of Spain, and the current monarch of the United Kingdom; King Charles III are both inbred, though Charles III to a much lesser degree. His parents are second cousins once removed.
1739667218752.png
 
FartmingerFuckwadCheeseSte said:
It isn't divinity or being chosen. This is just what those families believed at that time, and as a result they came to the conclusion that inbreeding would keep their blood "holy" and "pure".

King Charles II of Spain, and the current monarch of the United Kingdom; King Charles III are both inbred, though Charles III to a much lesser degree. His parents are second cousins once removed.
View attachment 148104
Click to expand...
Gigachad chin. He was born to rule over us.
 
DonutHole said:
Watch your tongue, commoner. Inciting the people against the nobility and questioning their divine right to rule will end with you in the stocks.
Click to expand...
I do feel somewhat bad for King Charles III. Queen Elizabeth was 27 when she was crowned Queen after her father passed away from lung cancer, had Charles been crowned King at the same age he would've become King back in 1974, he was only crowned King of the United Kingdom 48 years later after his mother's passing, so he waited all his life for this big opportunity, for the inevitable... and then he's diagnosed with cancer within the following year and he's not even 80, he'll be 77 this year.
While both of his parents lived to nearly 100. Philip was 99 and was going to turn 100 in a mere two months before he died, while Queen Elizabeth was 96.
And to rub salt into the wound; if he dies within the next couple of years Prince William will still only be in his mid-late 40s, so when he ascends to the throne at say 48 years old, he could live for another 42 years and die at 90. So then both his mother and his son had longer reigns than he did.
 
FartmingerFuckwadCheeseSte said:
I do feel somewhat bad for King Charles III. Queen Elizabeth was 27 when she was crowned Queen after her father passed away from lung cancer, had Charles been crowned King at the same age he would've become King back in 1974, he was only crowned King of the United Kingdom 48 years later after his mother's passing, so he waited all his life for this big opportunity, for the inevitiable... and then he's diagnosed with cancer within the following year and he's not even 80, he'll be 77 this year.
While both of his parents lived to nearly 100. Philip was 99 and was going to turn 100 in a mere two months before he died, while Queen Elizabeth was 96.
And to rub salt into the wound; if he dies within the next couple of years Prince William will still only be in his mid-late 40s, so when he ascends to the throne at say 48 years old, he could live for another 42 years and die at 90. So then both his mother and his son had longer reigns than he did.
Click to expand...
wurdz wurdz wurdz da left cant meem
 
DonutHole said:
Its funny though that Europe didn't abandon monarchism completely after the springtime of nations. In fact the reactionaries mostly won then. Only a few became republics. The majority of Europe became republics only after WW1.
Click to expand...
Ok but I don’t see very many monarchy’s right now.
 

Similar threads

AR47
Keyed Theocratic monarchy appreciation thread
Replies
3
Views
88
obsessed venusian
obsessed venusian
BlenderChud
Keyed Monarchy is the best form of government
Replies
17
Views
564
EVROPA
EVROPA
Back
Top